Predictive efficacy of machine-learning algorithms on intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy based on clinical and laboratory indicators.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jianhu He, Xiaojun Zhu, Xuan Yang, Hui Wang
{"title":"Predictive efficacy of machine-learning algorithms on intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy based on clinical and laboratory indicators.","authors":"Jianhu He, Xiaojun Zhu, Xuan Yang, Hui Wang","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2413854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), a condition exclusive to pregnancy, necessitates prompt identification and intervention to improve the perinatal outcomes. This study aims to develop suitable machine-learning models for predicting ICP based on clinical and laboratory indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed data from 1092 pregnant women, with 537 diagnosed with ICP and 555 healthy cases as a control. Two study schemes were devised. For scheme 1, 62 indicators from the first period of gestation were utilized to establish predictive models. For scheme 2, 62 indicators from at least two periods of gestation were utilized to establish predictive models. Under each scheme, three different machine-learning models were developed based on the Arya Privacy Computing Platform, encompassing Support Vector Machine (SVM), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Xgboost for Scheme 1, and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) for Scheme 2. The predictive efficacy of each model on ICP was evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under Scheme 1, the cohort comprised 1092 pregnant women (537 with ICP, 555 healthy). The SVM model exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.5%, 47.50%, and 67.90%, respectively, while DNN showed 65.70%, 92.70%, and 79.40%, respectively, and Xgboost achieved 65.60%, 81.90%, and 73.40%, respectively. In Scheme 2, 899 pregnant women were analyzed (466 with ICP, 433 healthy). RNN demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97.60%, 82.10%, and 90.50%, respectively; LSTM presented 90.70%, 81.70%, and 86.60%, respectively; and GRU achieved 89.90%, 83.80%, and 89.40%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DNN and RNN are the two most suitable models to predict ICP in a convenient and available way. It provides flexible choice for medical staff and helps them optimize the therapeutic strategies to meet different clinical setting and improve the clinical prognosis of ICP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"2413854"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2413854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), a condition exclusive to pregnancy, necessitates prompt identification and intervention to improve the perinatal outcomes. This study aims to develop suitable machine-learning models for predicting ICP based on clinical and laboratory indicators.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from 1092 pregnant women, with 537 diagnosed with ICP and 555 healthy cases as a control. Two study schemes were devised. For scheme 1, 62 indicators from the first period of gestation were utilized to establish predictive models. For scheme 2, 62 indicators from at least two periods of gestation were utilized to establish predictive models. Under each scheme, three different machine-learning models were developed based on the Arya Privacy Computing Platform, encompassing Support Vector Machine (SVM), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Xgboost for Scheme 1, and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) for Scheme 2. The predictive efficacy of each model on ICP was evaluated and compared.

Results: Under Scheme 1, the cohort comprised 1092 pregnant women (537 with ICP, 555 healthy). The SVM model exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.5%, 47.50%, and 67.90%, respectively, while DNN showed 65.70%, 92.70%, and 79.40%, respectively, and Xgboost achieved 65.60%, 81.90%, and 73.40%, respectively. In Scheme 2, 899 pregnant women were analyzed (466 with ICP, 433 healthy). RNN demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97.60%, 82.10%, and 90.50%, respectively; LSTM presented 90.70%, 81.70%, and 86.60%, respectively; and GRU achieved 89.90%, 83.80%, and 89.40%, respectively.

Conclusion: DNN and RNN are the two most suitable models to predict ICP in a convenient and available way. It provides flexible choice for medical staff and helps them optimize the therapeutic strategies to meet different clinical setting and improve the clinical prognosis of ICP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信