Ensuring quality information for patients tool to assess patient information on CABG websites: Systemic search and evaluation.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chun Wai Tai, Lam Wing Kwan, Jeremy Chan, Gianni D Angelini
{"title":"Ensuring quality information for patients tool to assess patient information on CABG websites: Systemic search and evaluation.","authors":"Chun Wai Tai, Lam Wing Kwan, Jeremy Chan, Gianni D Angelini","doi":"10.1177/02676591241303842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is the most common cardiac surgical procedure worldwide. The Internet is often the first place for patients to obtain medical information and may influence their health-seeking behaviour. This study aimed to assess the quality of online CABG information for patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review was conducted on the available CABG information online using four search terms in Google: \"coronary artery bypass grafting\", \"CABG\", \"bypass surgery\", and \"coronary surgery\". Websites on the first three pages of each search term were assessed by two independent assessors using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool (score 0-36).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>71 websites in total were eligible for the evaluation. Most websites originated from the USA and the UK (35% for both). The median EQIP score was 16.5. Most websites used everyday language (94%) in short sentences (83%). More than half (60%) of the websites addressed qualitative complications and risks of surgery. Only 1/3 of the websites described treatment alternatives, precautions before surgery, and warning signs after surgery. Only about 1/10 of websites could address quality-of-life issues and resolution of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most online sites concerning CABG scores were low in EQIP tool assessment in terms of quality and readability with insufficient sources. Minimal information is provided regarding the quantitative risks and complications. Enhancement of the credibility and informativeness of websites is needed to reduce patients' anxiety about surgical procedures and help with treatment options for coronary artery disease. Education and investigation on the consistency of high-quality websites may help patient identify high quality medical information.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"2676591241303842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241303842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is the most common cardiac surgical procedure worldwide. The Internet is often the first place for patients to obtain medical information and may influence their health-seeking behaviour. This study aimed to assess the quality of online CABG information for patients.

Methods: A review was conducted on the available CABG information online using four search terms in Google: "coronary artery bypass grafting", "CABG", "bypass surgery", and "coronary surgery". Websites on the first three pages of each search term were assessed by two independent assessors using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool (score 0-36).

Results: 71 websites in total were eligible for the evaluation. Most websites originated from the USA and the UK (35% for both). The median EQIP score was 16.5. Most websites used everyday language (94%) in short sentences (83%). More than half (60%) of the websites addressed qualitative complications and risks of surgery. Only 1/3 of the websites described treatment alternatives, precautions before surgery, and warning signs after surgery. Only about 1/10 of websites could address quality-of-life issues and resolution of complications.

Conclusion: Most online sites concerning CABG scores were low in EQIP tool assessment in terms of quality and readability with insufficient sources. Minimal information is provided regarding the quantitative risks and complications. Enhancement of the credibility and informativeness of websites is needed to reduce patients' anxiety about surgical procedures and help with treatment options for coronary artery disease. Education and investigation on the consistency of high-quality websites may help patient identify high quality medical information.

确保患者信息质量:评估CABG网站患者信息的工具:系统搜索和评估。
背景:冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)是世界范围内最常见的心脏外科手术。互联网往往是患者获取医疗信息的第一个地方,并可能影响他们的求医行为。本研究旨在评估患者在线冠脉搭桥信息的质量。方法:使用b谷歌中“冠状动脉旁路移植术”、“CABG”、“旁路手术”、“冠状动脉手术”四个搜索词,对网上可用的冠状动脉搭桥术信息进行综述。每个搜索词的前三页的网站由两名独立的评估人员使用确保患者质量信息(EQIP)工具进行评估(得分0-36)。结果:共有71个网站符合评价条件。大多数网站来自美国和英国(两者都占35%)。EQIP评分中位数为16.5。大多数网站在短句(83%)中使用日常语言(94%)。超过一半(60%)的网站涉及定性并发症和手术风险。只有1/3的网站描述了治疗方案、手术前注意事项和手术后的警告信号。只有大约十分之一的网站可以解决生活质量问题和解决并发症。结论:大多数有关CABG评分的在线网站在EQIP工具评估的质量和可读性方面较低,且来源不足。提供的关于定量风险和并发症的信息很少。需要提高网站的可信度和信息量,以减少患者对外科手术的焦虑,并帮助他们选择冠状动脉疾病的治疗方案。对高质量网站的一致性进行教育和调查,有助于患者识别高质量的医疗信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信