Intensive care nurses' knowledge of pressure injury prevention.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ntombifikile Klaas, Ricki-Lee Serebro
{"title":"Intensive care nurses' knowledge of pressure injury prevention.","authors":"Ntombifikile Klaas, Ricki-Lee Serebro","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02533-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant public health concern due to their high prevalence among critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Despite advancements in science and technology related to PI prevention, the prevalence continues to rise. A key factor contributing to this rise is inadequate knowledge and limited use of evidence-based practices by nurses, resulting in prolonged hospital stays and poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to determine the knowledge of intensive care nurses regarding pressure injury prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design was used to collect data from 101 nurses working in four ICUs at an academic hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa. The revised Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT 2.0) was utilized to gather data from a convenience sample of intensive care nurses. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze the data, with statistical tests including the Shapiro-Wilk test, univariate and multivariate linear regression, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient tests. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean knowledge score of the nurses (N = 101) was 42.16% (SD 12.09), indicating poor knowledge of PI prevention. The lowest scores were observed in the areas of \"prevention of pressure injuries\" (25%) and \"classification and observation\" (39.5%). Higher levels of education (14.00; 95% CI 2.90-25.11; p = 0.014), seniority (15.58; 95% CI 2.92-28.24; p = 0.016), and years of experience (6.38; 95% CI 9.70-5.45; p = 0.039) were statistically significant predictors of better prevention and management of PI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrate that intensive care nurses have poor knowledge of prevention measures, classification, and observation of stages. This may hinder their ability to effectively utilize risk assessment tools in clinical practice. Improving training and providing intensive care nurses with adequate information about evidence-based practices to prevent PI could strengthen their contribution to patient safety. These findings underscore the need for continuous, mandatory training programs for intensive care nurses to stay updated with the latest evidence and practices in PI prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02533-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant public health concern due to their high prevalence among critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Despite advancements in science and technology related to PI prevention, the prevalence continues to rise. A key factor contributing to this rise is inadequate knowledge and limited use of evidence-based practices by nurses, resulting in prolonged hospital stays and poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to determine the knowledge of intensive care nurses regarding pressure injury prevention.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used to collect data from 101 nurses working in four ICUs at an academic hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa. The revised Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT 2.0) was utilized to gather data from a convenience sample of intensive care nurses. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze the data, with statistical tests including the Shapiro-Wilk test, univariate and multivariate linear regression, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient tests. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean knowledge score of the nurses (N = 101) was 42.16% (SD 12.09), indicating poor knowledge of PI prevention. The lowest scores were observed in the areas of "prevention of pressure injuries" (25%) and "classification and observation" (39.5%). Higher levels of education (14.00; 95% CI 2.90-25.11; p = 0.014), seniority (15.58; 95% CI 2.92-28.24; p = 0.016), and years of experience (6.38; 95% CI 9.70-5.45; p = 0.039) were statistically significant predictors of better prevention and management of PI.

Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that intensive care nurses have poor knowledge of prevention measures, classification, and observation of stages. This may hinder their ability to effectively utilize risk assessment tools in clinical practice. Improving training and providing intensive care nurses with adequate information about evidence-based practices to prevent PI could strengthen their contribution to patient safety. These findings underscore the need for continuous, mandatory training programs for intensive care nurses to stay updated with the latest evidence and practices in PI prevention.

重症监护护士对压伤预防知识的了解。
背景:压力损伤(PIs)仍然是一个重要的公共卫生问题,因为它们在重症监护病房(icu)的重症患者中非常普遍。尽管与预防PI相关的科学技术取得了进步,但患病率仍在继续上升。导致这一上升的一个关键因素是护士知识不足和对循证实践的使用有限,导致住院时间延长和患者预后不佳。本研究旨在了解重症监护护士对压力伤害预防的认知。方法:采用描述性横断面设计收集南非豪登省一家学术医院4个icu的101名护士的数据。使用修订后的压疮知识评估工具(PUKAT 2.0)收集重症监护护士的方便样本数据。采用描述性统计和推理统计对数据进行分析,统计检验包括Shapiro-Wilk检验、单变量和多变量线性回归、Cronbach’s alpha系数检验。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:101名护士的平均知识得分为42.16% (SD为12.09),对PI的预防知识较差。得分最低的是“压伤预防”(25%)和“分类与观察”(39.5%)。高等教育水平(14.00;95% ci 2.90-25.11;P = 0.014),工龄(15.58;95% ci 2.92-28.24;P = 0.016)、工作年限(6.38;95% ci 9.70-5.45;p = 0.039)是更好地预防和管理PI的有统计学意义的预测因子。结论:本研究结果表明重症监护护士对预防措施、分级及分期观察的认识较差。这可能会阻碍他们在临床实践中有效利用风险评估工具的能力。加强培训并向重症监护护士提供有关预防PI的循证实践的充分信息,可以加强他们对患者安全的贡献。这些发现强调需要对重症监护护士进行持续的强制性培训计划,以保持最新的PI预防证据和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信