Number of Retrieval Attempts and the Association of Intravenous Tirofiban with Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Successful Endovascular Therapy: Results of the RESCUE BT Trial.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S481084
Xiangxiang Peng, Changwei Guo, Jie Yang, Shitao Fan, Xu Xu, Jinfu Ma, Zhixi Wang, Shihai Yang, Wenjie Zi, Xianjun Huang, Hongjun Wang
{"title":"Number of Retrieval Attempts and the Association of Intravenous Tirofiban with Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Successful Endovascular Therapy: Results of the RESCUE BT Trial.","authors":"Xiangxiang Peng, Changwei Guo, Jie Yang, Shitao Fan, Xu Xu, Jinfu Ma, Zhixi Wang, Shihai Yang, Wenjie Zi, Xianjun Huang, Hongjun Wang","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S481084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the relationship between intravenous tirofiban, the number of retrieval attempts and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients with successful EVT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We used the data from the Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (RESCUE BT) Trial. The primary outcome was sICH, which was defined according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. The association between the number of retrieval attempts and the rate of sICH was investigated using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 866 patients were included in our analysis. In overall cohort, tirofiban (OR: 1.853, 95% CI: 1.039-3.307) and more than 2 passes (3 versus 0-1: OR: 2.482, 95% CI: 1.124-5.481; 2 versus 0-1: OR: 0.813, 95% CI: 0.389-1.696) were significantly associated with the occurrence of sICH. A significant interaction between the use of tirofiban and the increasing number of attempts was found (p for interaction = 0.02), whereby the presence of sICH was significantly associated with tirofiban (OR: 5.534, 95% CI: 1.586-19.315) in the subgroup of multiple passes (>2 passes group), while none was seen in the subgroup of 0-2 passes. The results of the sensitivity analysis also showed that more than 2 passes (3 versus 1: OR: 2.841, 95% CI: 1.102-7.323; 2 versus 1: OR: 0.852, 95% CI: 0.346-2.097) were significantly associated with the occurrence of sICH in the tirofiban group but not in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with multiple attempts, intravenous tirofiban may increase the risk of sICH. Further research and individualized risk assessment are necessary to determine the most appropriate strategy of intravenous tirofiban for EVT patients, especially considering details of thrombectomy procedures.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>: URL: http:// www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17014167.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"19 ","pages":"2001-2012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S481084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between intravenous tirofiban, the number of retrieval attempts and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients with successful EVT.

Patients and methods: We used the data from the Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (RESCUE BT) Trial. The primary outcome was sICH, which was defined according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. The association between the number of retrieval attempts and the rate of sICH was investigated using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: A total of 866 patients were included in our analysis. In overall cohort, tirofiban (OR: 1.853, 95% CI: 1.039-3.307) and more than 2 passes (3 versus 0-1: OR: 2.482, 95% CI: 1.124-5.481; 2 versus 0-1: OR: 0.813, 95% CI: 0.389-1.696) were significantly associated with the occurrence of sICH. A significant interaction between the use of tirofiban and the increasing number of attempts was found (p for interaction = 0.02), whereby the presence of sICH was significantly associated with tirofiban (OR: 5.534, 95% CI: 1.586-19.315) in the subgroup of multiple passes (>2 passes group), while none was seen in the subgroup of 0-2 passes. The results of the sensitivity analysis also showed that more than 2 passes (3 versus 1: OR: 2.841, 95% CI: 1.102-7.323; 2 versus 1: OR: 0.852, 95% CI: 0.346-2.097) were significantly associated with the occurrence of sICH in the tirofiban group but not in the placebo group.

Conclusion: In patients with multiple attempts, intravenous tirofiban may increase the risk of sICH. Further research and individualized risk assessment are necessary to determine the most appropriate strategy of intravenous tirofiban for EVT patients, especially considering details of thrombectomy procedures.

Registration: : URL: http:// www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

静脉替罗非班与血管内治疗成功患者症状性颅内出血的关系:RESCUE BT试验的结果
目的:探讨静脉滴注替罗非班、取物次数与EVT成功患者症状性颅内出血(siich)的关系。患者和方法:我们使用的数据来自大血管闭塞性卒中患者血管内治疗用替罗非班与不使用替罗非班(RESCUE BT)试验。主要结局为siich,根据Heidelberg出血分类进行定义。使用多变量逻辑回归研究检索次数与sICH发生率之间的关系。结果:共有866例患者纳入我们的分析。在整个队列中,替罗非班(OR: 1.853, 95% CI: 1.039-3.307)和超过2次通过(3对0-1:OR: 2.482, 95% CI: 1.124-5.481;2 vs 0-1: OR: 0.813, 95% CI: 0.389-1.696)与sICH的发生显著相关。使用替罗非班与尝试次数的增加之间存在显著的相互作用(相互作用的p = 0.02),在多次通过亚组(>2次通过组)中,sICH的存在与替罗非班显著相关(OR: 5.534, 95% CI: 1.586-19.315),而在0-2次通过亚组中没有发现。敏感性分析的结果也显示,2次以上(3对1):OR: 2.841, 95% CI: 1.102 ~ 7.323;2对1:OR: 0.852, 95% CI: 0.346-2.097)与替罗非班组sICH的发生显著相关,而安慰剂组无。结论:在多次尝试的患者中,静脉注射替罗非班可能增加sICH的风险。进一步的研究和个体化的风险评估对于EVT患者确定最合适的静脉注射替罗非班策略是必要的,特别是考虑到血栓切除术的细节。注册:URL: http:// www.chictr.org.cn;唯一标识符:ChiCTR-INR-17014167。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信