{"title":"Construction and Validation of a Predictive Model for Long-Term Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Peng Yang, Jieying Duan, Mingxuan Li, Rui Tan, Yuan Li, Zeqing Zhang, Ying Wang","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S486839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current scoring systems used to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) lack some key components and their predictive ability needs improvement. This study aimed to develop a more effective scoring system for predicting 3-year MACE in patients with AMI.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Our statistical analyses included data for 461 patients with AMI. Eighty percent of patients (n=369) were randomly assigned to the training set and the remaining patients (n=92) to the validation set. Independent risk factors for MACE were identified in univariate and multifactorial logistic regression analyses. A nomogram was used to create the scoring system, the predictive ability of which was assessed using calibration curve, decision curve analysis, receiver-operating characteristic curve, and survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nomogram model included the following seven variables: age, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, Killip class, chronic kidney disease, lipoprotein(a), and percutaneous coronary intervention during hospitalization. The predicted and observed values for the nomogram model were in good agreement based on the calibration curves. Decision curve analysis showed that the clinical nomogram model had good predictive ability. The area under the curve (AUC) for the scoring system was 0.775 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.728-0.823) in the training set and 0.789 (95% CI 0.693-0.886) in the validation set. Risk stratification based on the scoring system found that the risk of MACE was 4.51-fold higher (95% CI 3.24-6.28) in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. Notably, this scoring system demonstrated better predictive ability than the GRACE risk score (AUC 0.776 vs 0.731; <i>P</i>=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scoring system developed from the nomogram in this study showed favorable performance in prediction of MACE and risk stratification of patients with AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"19 ","pages":"1965-1977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S486839","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Current scoring systems used to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) lack some key components and their predictive ability needs improvement. This study aimed to develop a more effective scoring system for predicting 3-year MACE in patients with AMI.
Patients and methods: Our statistical analyses included data for 461 patients with AMI. Eighty percent of patients (n=369) were randomly assigned to the training set and the remaining patients (n=92) to the validation set. Independent risk factors for MACE were identified in univariate and multifactorial logistic regression analyses. A nomogram was used to create the scoring system, the predictive ability of which was assessed using calibration curve, decision curve analysis, receiver-operating characteristic curve, and survival analysis.
Results: The nomogram model included the following seven variables: age, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, Killip class, chronic kidney disease, lipoprotein(a), and percutaneous coronary intervention during hospitalization. The predicted and observed values for the nomogram model were in good agreement based on the calibration curves. Decision curve analysis showed that the clinical nomogram model had good predictive ability. The area under the curve (AUC) for the scoring system was 0.775 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.728-0.823) in the training set and 0.789 (95% CI 0.693-0.886) in the validation set. Risk stratification based on the scoring system found that the risk of MACE was 4.51-fold higher (95% CI 3.24-6.28) in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. Notably, this scoring system demonstrated better predictive ability than the GRACE risk score (AUC 0.776 vs 0.731; P=0.007).
Conclusion: The scoring system developed from the nomogram in this study showed favorable performance in prediction of MACE and risk stratification of patients with AMI.
目的:目前用于预测急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的评分系统缺乏一些关键成分,预测能力有待提高。本研究旨在开发一种更有效的评分系统来预测AMI患者3年MACE。患者和方法:我们的统计分析包括461例AMI患者的数据。80%的患者(n=369)被随机分配到训练集,其余患者(n=92)被分配到验证集。通过单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定MACE的独立危险因素。采用nomogram建立评分系统,通过校准曲线、决策曲线分析、患者-工作特征曲线和生存分析来评估评分系统的预测能力。结果:nomogram model包括以下7个变量:年龄、糖尿病、既往心肌梗死、Killip分级、慢性肾病、脂蛋白(a)、住院期间经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。从标定曲线上看,模型预测值与实测值吻合较好。决策曲线分析表明,临床nomogram模型具有较好的预测能力。评分系统的曲线下面积(AUC)在训练集中为0.775(95%置信区间[CI] 0.728-0.823),在验证集中为0.789 (95% CI 0.693-0.886)。基于评分系统的风险分层发现,高危组的MACE风险比低危组高4.51倍(95% CI 3.24-6.28)。值得注意的是,该评分系统表现出比GRACE风险评分更好的预测能力(AUC 0.776 vs 0.731;P = 0.007)。结论:本研究以nomogram为基础建立的评分系统在预测AMI患者MACE及风险分层方面表现良好。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.