Effect of Robot-Assisted Surgery on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures after Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation: a Meta-Analysis and a Validation Cohort.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.4055/cios24086
Haibo Li, Juan Zou, Jianlin Yu
{"title":"Effect of Robot-Assisted Surgery on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures after Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation: a Meta-Analysis and a Validation Cohort.","authors":"Haibo Li, Juan Zou, Jianlin Yu","doi":"10.4055/cios24086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of robot-assisted surgery (RA) on the risk of new vertebral compression fracture (NVCF) and bone cement leakage in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) after percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA), including percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and adverse effects of RA-PVA versus fluoroscopy-assisted (FA)-PVA in patients with OVCF. A validation cohort of 385 patients who underwent PVP or PKP was retrospectively analyzed. In addition, we attempted to create well-calibrated nomograms to estimate the risk of NVCF and bone cement leakage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of NVCF and bone cement leakage was significantly lower in RA-PVA than in FA-PVA. The validation cohort confirmed that RA-PVA provided better results than FA-PVA in terms of NVCF and bone cement leakage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The meta-analysis and the validation cohort suggest that RA reduced the risk of NVCF and bone cement leakage in patients with OVCF after PVA. The nomograms are accurate and easy-to-implement methods for clinicians to estimate the risk of NVCF and bone cement leakage after PVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"16 6","pages":"948-961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of robot-assisted surgery (RA) on the risk of new vertebral compression fracture (NVCF) and bone cement leakage in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) after percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA), including percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP).

Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and adverse effects of RA-PVA versus fluoroscopy-assisted (FA)-PVA in patients with OVCF. A validation cohort of 385 patients who underwent PVP or PKP was retrospectively analyzed. In addition, we attempted to create well-calibrated nomograms to estimate the risk of NVCF and bone cement leakage.

Results: The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of NVCF and bone cement leakage was significantly lower in RA-PVA than in FA-PVA. The validation cohort confirmed that RA-PVA provided better results than FA-PVA in terms of NVCF and bone cement leakage.

Conclusions: The meta-analysis and the validation cohort suggest that RA reduced the risk of NVCF and bone cement leakage in patients with OVCF after PVA. The nomograms are accurate and easy-to-implement methods for clinicians to estimate the risk of NVCF and bone cement leakage after PVA.

机器人辅助手术对经皮椎体增强术后骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者临床结果的影响:meta分析和验证队列
背景:本研究的目的是探讨机器人辅助手术(RA)对骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)患者经皮椎体增强术(PVA)(包括经皮后凸成形术(PKP)和经皮椎体成形术(PVP)后发生新椎体压缩性骨折(NVCF)和骨水泥泄漏风险的影响。方法:通过荟萃分析评估RA-PVA与透视辅助(FA)-PVA在OVCF患者中的临床结果和不良反应。回顾性分析了385例PVP或PKP患者的验证队列。此外,我们试图创建校准良好的nomogram来评估NVCF和骨水泥渗漏的风险。结果:meta分析显示RA-PVA组NVCF和骨水泥渗漏的发生率明显低于FA-PVA组。验证队列证实,RA-PVA在NVCF和骨水泥渗漏方面的效果优于FA-PVA。结论:荟萃分析和验证队列表明,RA降低了PVA后OVCF患者NVCF和骨水泥渗漏的风险。这些图是临床医生评估PVA术后NVCF和骨水泥渗漏风险的准确且易于实施的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信