Family Physicians' Knowledge and Perceived Confidence with Clinical Ophthalmology.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S467139
Sahar Othman, Ammar Alasmari, Mahmood Showail
{"title":"Family Physicians' Knowledge and Perceived Confidence with Clinical Ophthalmology.","authors":"Sahar Othman, Ammar Alasmari, Mahmood Showail","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S467139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ophthalmology poses challenges for general practitioners, who have been identified globally as receiving inadequate training. Family medicine (FM) trainees often lack sufficient ophthalmology training; however, this issue is not unique to Saudi Arabia. Studies from Australia, the United States of America, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom have revealed the same concerns. Patient consultations offer opportunities for applying skills gained through structured education, yet the extent of FM trainees' clinical exposure to ophthalmology remains unclear. Effective workshops designed to enhance primary healthcare providers' ophthalmic skills exist internationally, but similar initiatives are lacking in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This one-year, cross-sectional study distributed a self-administered online questionnaire among family physicians and residents in a university hospital and the hospital's medical services center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Data were inspected and cleaned in Excel and analyzed using IBM SPSS 29.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ophthalmology knowledge of family physicians averaged 5.1 on a scale of 1-10, suggesting moderate proficiency. Exposure to ophthalmology cases varied, indicating potential knowledge gaps and necessitating targeted educational interventions. Notably, 82.5% of the physicians believed that family physicians should lead the primary eye care by assuming responsibility for ensuring high levels of training and practice. Our study identified predictors influencing knowledge and confidence, including the effects of experience, training duration, and recognition of the necessity of continuous professional development courses. However, none of these associations were found to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The physicians in our study exhibited a moderate level of ophthalmology knowledge (mean score = 5.1), revealing potential knowledge gaps. Despite their varied exposure to ophthalmology, 82.5% of the family physicians in this study advocated leading the medical profession in primary eye care. Experience and training duration were found to be non-significant predictors of knowledge and confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"15 ","pages":"1175-1183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S467139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ophthalmology poses challenges for general practitioners, who have been identified globally as receiving inadequate training. Family medicine (FM) trainees often lack sufficient ophthalmology training; however, this issue is not unique to Saudi Arabia. Studies from Australia, the United States of America, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom have revealed the same concerns. Patient consultations offer opportunities for applying skills gained through structured education, yet the extent of FM trainees' clinical exposure to ophthalmology remains unclear. Effective workshops designed to enhance primary healthcare providers' ophthalmic skills exist internationally, but similar initiatives are lacking in Saudi Arabia.

Patients and methods: This one-year, cross-sectional study distributed a self-administered online questionnaire among family physicians and residents in a university hospital and the hospital's medical services center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Data were inspected and cleaned in Excel and analyzed using IBM SPSS 29.

Results: The ophthalmology knowledge of family physicians averaged 5.1 on a scale of 1-10, suggesting moderate proficiency. Exposure to ophthalmology cases varied, indicating potential knowledge gaps and necessitating targeted educational interventions. Notably, 82.5% of the physicians believed that family physicians should lead the primary eye care by assuming responsibility for ensuring high levels of training and practice. Our study identified predictors influencing knowledge and confidence, including the effects of experience, training duration, and recognition of the necessity of continuous professional development courses. However, none of these associations were found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: The physicians in our study exhibited a moderate level of ophthalmology knowledge (mean score = 5.1), revealing potential knowledge gaps. Despite their varied exposure to ophthalmology, 82.5% of the family physicians in this study advocated leading the medical profession in primary eye care. Experience and training duration were found to be non-significant predictors of knowledge and confidence.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信