#infertility in Brazil: an analysis of authorship and post content on Instagram.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Márcia Mendonca Carneiro, Caio Nobuyoshi Koga, Marcela Chagas Lima Mussi, Pollyanna Faria Fradico, Marisa Mendonça Carneiro
{"title":"#infertility in Brazil: an analysis of authorship and post content on Instagram.","authors":"Márcia Mendonca Carneiro, Caio Nobuyoshi Koga, Marcela Chagas Lima Mussi, Pollyanna Faria Fradico, Marisa Mendonça Carneiro","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use hashtag and content analysis to determine the prevalence, authorship, and types of fertility-related and oncofertility information shared on Instagram in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven fertility-related hashtags were chosen according to https://www.tagsfinder.com/: #infertility, #ivf, #endometriosis, #tryingotconceive, #maternity, #humanreproduction, #pregnancy, #invitrofertilization, #assistedreproduction, #pregnant, #difficulttogetpregnant. For oncofertility, the hashtags were #cancerandpregnancy, #oocytecryopreservation), #oncofertility, and #fertilitypreservation. Posts receiving over 20 comments in March 2021 were analyzed for topic and content. They were divided into six categories (educational, patient experience, outreach, emotional, social support, and coping mechanisms) before being analyzed by three authors. Authorship was divided into healthcare professionals (HCP) and lay people (LP). Posts not written in Brazilian Portuguese, videos, reposts of another account, and commercial posts were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 220 posts with fertility-related terms were analyzed. HCP accounted for 52% (n=114) and LP for 48% (n=106). Most HCP posts were made by medical doctors (n=78; 68.4%) and fertility clinics (n=27; 23.6%). Authorship analysis (HCP vs. LP) for each hashtag was as follows: #infertility (35% vs. 65%), #ivf (35% vs. 65%), #endometriosis (45% vs. 55%), #tryingtoconceive (65% vs. 35%), #maternity (LP 100%), #humanreproduction (20% vs. 80%), #pregnancy (95% vs. 5%), #invitrofertilization (50% vs. 50%), #assistedreproduction (5% vs. 95%), #pregnant (85% vs. 15%), #difficulttogetpregnant (5% vs. 95%). The category breakdown was as follows: 39% educational, 19% emotional, 16% social support, 13% patient experience, 9% coping, and 4% outreach. A total of 98 posts with #oncofertility were retrieved. Most (77.5%; n=62) were written by HCP. They fell into the following categories: 55% educational, 15% patient experience, 12.5% emotional, 11.2% support, and 3.2% coping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both HCP and LP write about major fertility topics on Instagram. Oncofertility appears to gain less attention. In Brazil, educational content, followed by emotional content, prevails on Instagram.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":"28 4","pages":"678-682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To use hashtag and content analysis to determine the prevalence, authorship, and types of fertility-related and oncofertility information shared on Instagram in Brazil.

Methods: Eleven fertility-related hashtags were chosen according to https://www.tagsfinder.com/: #infertility, #ivf, #endometriosis, #tryingotconceive, #maternity, #humanreproduction, #pregnancy, #invitrofertilization, #assistedreproduction, #pregnant, #difficulttogetpregnant. For oncofertility, the hashtags were #cancerandpregnancy, #oocytecryopreservation), #oncofertility, and #fertilitypreservation. Posts receiving over 20 comments in March 2021 were analyzed for topic and content. They were divided into six categories (educational, patient experience, outreach, emotional, social support, and coping mechanisms) before being analyzed by three authors. Authorship was divided into healthcare professionals (HCP) and lay people (LP). Posts not written in Brazilian Portuguese, videos, reposts of another account, and commercial posts were excluded.

Results: A total of 220 posts with fertility-related terms were analyzed. HCP accounted for 52% (n=114) and LP for 48% (n=106). Most HCP posts were made by medical doctors (n=78; 68.4%) and fertility clinics (n=27; 23.6%). Authorship analysis (HCP vs. LP) for each hashtag was as follows: #infertility (35% vs. 65%), #ivf (35% vs. 65%), #endometriosis (45% vs. 55%), #tryingtoconceive (65% vs. 35%), #maternity (LP 100%), #humanreproduction (20% vs. 80%), #pregnancy (95% vs. 5%), #invitrofertilization (50% vs. 50%), #assistedreproduction (5% vs. 95%), #pregnant (85% vs. 15%), #difficulttogetpregnant (5% vs. 95%). The category breakdown was as follows: 39% educational, 19% emotional, 16% social support, 13% patient experience, 9% coping, and 4% outreach. A total of 98 posts with #oncofertility were retrieved. Most (77.5%; n=62) were written by HCP. They fell into the following categories: 55% educational, 15% patient experience, 12.5% emotional, 11.2% support, and 3.2% coping.

Conclusions: Both HCP and LP write about major fertility topics on Instagram. Oncofertility appears to gain less attention. In Brazil, educational content, followed by emotional content, prevails on Instagram.

#巴西的不孕症:对Instagram上的作者和帖子内容的分析。
目的:利用标签和内容分析来确定巴西Instagram上分享的生育相关和肿瘤信息的流行程度、作者和类型。方法:根据https://www.tagsfinder.com/选择11个与生育相关的标签:#不孕症,#试管婴儿,#子宫内膜异位症,#尝试怀孕,#生育,#人类生殖,#怀孕,#体外受精,#辅助生殖,#怀孕,#怀孕,#难以怀孕。对于癌症生育能力,标签是#癌症和怀孕,#保存卵母细胞),#癌症生育能力和#生育能力保存。对2021年3月评论数超过20条的帖子进行了主题和内容分析。在三位作者分析之前,他们被分为六类(教育、患者体验、外联、情感、社会支持和应对机制)。作者分为医疗保健专业人员(HCP)和非专业人员(LP)。不是用巴西葡萄牙语写的帖子、视频、其他账户的转发以及商业帖子都被排除在外。结果:共对220个涉及生育相关术语的岗位进行分析。HCP占52% (n=114), LP占48% (n=106)。大多数HCP职位由医生担任(n=78;68.4%)和生育诊所(n=27;23.6%)。每个标签的作者分析(HCP vs. LP)如下:#不孕症(35% vs. 65%), #试管婴儿(35% vs. 65%), #子宫内膜异位症(45% vs. 55%), #尝试怀孕(65% vs. 35%), #孕妇(100%),#人类生殖(20% vs. 80%), #怀孕(95% vs. 5%), #体外受精(50% vs. 50%), #辅助生殖(5% vs. 95%), #怀孕(85% vs. 15%), #难以怀孕(5% vs. 95%)。分类如下:39%的教育,19%的情感,16%的社会支持,13%的患者体验,9%的应对,4%的外展。共检索到98篇带有#oncofertility的文章。大部分(77.5%;n=62)采用HCP书写。他们分为以下几类:55%为教育类,15%为患者体验类,12.5%为情感类,11.2%为支持类,3.2%为应对类。结论:HCP和LP都在Instagram上写主要的生育话题。肿瘤生育似乎得到的关注较少。在巴西,Instagram上最流行的是教育内容,其次是情感内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信