Rights That.

IF 1.4 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ojls/gqae021

Eleanor Eldridge

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hohfeld was acutely aware of the 'potent tendency [of words] to control thought'. He was perhaps less aware of the power of syntax to do the same. Hohfeld's tendency to express the content of duties and liberties in the syntactically restrictive to ϕ form has allowed a corrupted version of his analytical scheme to take root. That version takes as axiomatic that the content of any duty or liberty is the action or inaction of the duty bearer or liberty holder. Yet duties and liberties can (and do) pertain to matters other than the action or inaction of the duty bearer or liberty holder. This insight has a range of doctrinal implications.

查看原文本刊更多论文

权利。

Hohfeld敏锐地意识到“语言控制思想的强大趋势”。他可能没有意识到语法在这方面的作用。Hohfeld倾向于用语法限制的ϕ形式来表达义务和自由的内容，这使得他的分析方案的一个错误版本得以扎根。该版本认为，任何义务或自由的内容都是义务承担者或自由持有人的作为或不作为。然而，责任和自由可以（而且确实）涉及责任承担者或自由持有人的作为或不作为以外的事项。这种洞见具有一系列的教义含义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies LAW-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Oxford Journal of Legal Studies is published on behalf of the Faculty of Law in the University of Oxford. It is designed to encourage interest in all matters relating to law, with an emphasis on matters of theory and on broad issues arising from the relationship of law to other disciplines. No topic of legal interest is excluded from consideration. In addition to traditional questions of legal interest, the following are all within the purview of the journal: comparative and international law, the law of the European Community, legal history and philosophy, and interdisciplinary material in areas of relevance.