Unlicensed "Special" Medicines: Using the Pillar Integration Model to Understand Stakeholder Perspectives Across Care Settings.

IF 2.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IPRP.S477087
Alesha Wale, Efi Mantzourani
{"title":"Unlicensed \"Special\" Medicines: Using the Pillar Integration Model to Understand Stakeholder Perspectives Across Care Settings.","authors":"Alesha Wale, Efi Mantzourani","doi":"10.2147/IPRP.S477087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of unlicensed medicines has been associated with safety concerns, availability and accessibility issues, and lack of integrated care across care settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the interaction between the views and experiences of those who prescribe, those who supply and those who receive unlicensed \"special\" medicines, so that factors affecting the patient journey and successful treatment can be identified and used to inform areas for change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, phenomenological approach was adopted, with semi-structured interviews with prescribers, community pharmacy staff and patients. A combination of stratified, purposive, snowball and convenience sampling was used to identify participants. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and the findings were integrated using an adapted model of the Pillar Integration Process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three pillars were constructed after synthesising results from interviews with patients (n=4), prescribers (n=5) and pharmacy staff (n=6): the awareness of licensing status; perceptions of patient care and acceptability of unlicensed medicine use; and challenges associated with the accessibility of unlicensed medicines. The varying levels of awareness when unlicensed medicines are prescribed and the varying perceptions of responsibility and acceptability of the use of unlicensed medicines help to explain the challenges faced by participants across the patient journey, Challenges identified included understanding what unlicensed medicines are, awareness of the licensing status when unlicensed medicines are prescribed, managing care across care settings to ensure the patient is effectively treated and ensuring continuity of care for patients in the community.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results highlight a clear need for more integrated care and support for prescribers to reduce the chances of delays between care settings, and more patient-centred care to ensure that any delays when accessing medicines do not lead to treatment disruption for the patient. The new national guidelines informed by findings of this study can support policy-makers across the globe.</p>","PeriodicalId":45655,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","volume":"13 ","pages":"209-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S477087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of unlicensed medicines has been associated with safety concerns, availability and accessibility issues, and lack of integrated care across care settings.

Objective: To understand the interaction between the views and experiences of those who prescribe, those who supply and those who receive unlicensed "special" medicines, so that factors affecting the patient journey and successful treatment can be identified and used to inform areas for change.

Methods: A qualitative, phenomenological approach was adopted, with semi-structured interviews with prescribers, community pharmacy staff and patients. A combination of stratified, purposive, snowball and convenience sampling was used to identify participants. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and the findings were integrated using an adapted model of the Pillar Integration Process.

Results: Three pillars were constructed after synthesising results from interviews with patients (n=4), prescribers (n=5) and pharmacy staff (n=6): the awareness of licensing status; perceptions of patient care and acceptability of unlicensed medicine use; and challenges associated with the accessibility of unlicensed medicines. The varying levels of awareness when unlicensed medicines are prescribed and the varying perceptions of responsibility and acceptability of the use of unlicensed medicines help to explain the challenges faced by participants across the patient journey, Challenges identified included understanding what unlicensed medicines are, awareness of the licensing status when unlicensed medicines are prescribed, managing care across care settings to ensure the patient is effectively treated and ensuring continuity of care for patients in the community.

Conclusion: The results highlight a clear need for more integrated care and support for prescribers to reduce the chances of delays between care settings, and more patient-centred care to ensure that any delays when accessing medicines do not lead to treatment disruption for the patient. The new national guidelines informed by findings of this study can support policy-makers across the globe.

未经许可的“特殊”药物:使用支柱整合模型来理解跨护理环境的利益相关者观点。
背景:使用无证药品与安全问题、可得性和可及性问题以及缺乏跨医疗机构的综合护理有关。目的:了解开处方者、供应者和接受无证“特殊”药物者的观点和经验之间的相互作用,以便确定影响患者旅程和成功治疗的因素,并用于通知变革领域。方法:采用定性、现象学方法,对处方医师、社区药房工作人员和患者进行半结构化访谈。采用分层、有目的、滚雪球和便利抽样相结合的方法来确定参与者。访谈采用反身性专题分析进行分析,调查结果采用支柱整合过程的改编模型进行整合。结果:综合对患者(n=4)、开处方者(n=5)和药房工作人员(n=6)的访谈结果,构建了三个支柱:对许可状态的认知;对病人护理的认识和对无证用药的可接受性;以及与获取无证药品相关的挑战。对开无证药品的不同认识程度以及对使用无证药品的责任和可接受性的不同认识有助于解释参与者在整个患者旅程中面临的挑战。确定的挑战包括了解什么是无证药品,在开无证药品时对许可状况的认识,管理各个护理机构的护理,以确保患者得到有效治疗,并确保社区患者护理的连续性。结论:研究结果突出表明,显然需要更综合的护理和对处方者的支持,以减少护理环境之间延误的机会,并需要更多以患者为中心的护理,以确保获得药物时的任何延误不会导致患者治疗中断。根据这项研究结果制定的新的国家指南可以为全球的政策制定者提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信