The problem of suicidality, personality disorder, and treatment: an alternative psycho-social perspective.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Marco Chiesa
{"title":"The problem of suicidality, personality disorder, and treatment: an alternative psycho-social perspective.","authors":"Marco Chiesa","doi":"10.4081/ripppo.2024.779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicidal behaviour, including both attempted and completed suicides, has been increasing globally, particularly in industrialized nations, making suicidality a significant public health concern. Despite the allocation of increasing resources by US, EU, and UK governmental and mental health bodies, the effectiveness of current strategies for the treatment, management, and prevention of suicide remains in question. This paper reviews evidence from epidemiological studies and national prevention policies, alongside research data from a London-based specialist personality disorder treatment centre and clinical case studies from private psychiatric/psychotherapy practice, to explore an alternative psychosocial approach to addressing suicidality. The dominant psychiatric model, which relies heavily on medication, hospitalization, and often coercive methods of control, may have iatrogenic effects, potentially exacerbating the risk of suicide. In contrast, a psychodynamic and psychosocial approach, focused on understanding the underlying psychological dimensions of suicidality, fostering a trusting therapeutic alliance, addressing both internal and external factors contributing to suicidal behaviour, and promoting open dialogue around suicidal thoughts, has shown promise in reducing suicide risk. The findings presented in this paper argue for a rethinking of traditional psychiatric approaches, advocating for a shift toward more personalized, collaborative, and psychologically informed interventions that can more effectively reduce the risk of suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":44262,"journal":{"name":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2024.779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicidal behaviour, including both attempted and completed suicides, has been increasing globally, particularly in industrialized nations, making suicidality a significant public health concern. Despite the allocation of increasing resources by US, EU, and UK governmental and mental health bodies, the effectiveness of current strategies for the treatment, management, and prevention of suicide remains in question. This paper reviews evidence from epidemiological studies and national prevention policies, alongside research data from a London-based specialist personality disorder treatment centre and clinical case studies from private psychiatric/psychotherapy practice, to explore an alternative psychosocial approach to addressing suicidality. The dominant psychiatric model, which relies heavily on medication, hospitalization, and often coercive methods of control, may have iatrogenic effects, potentially exacerbating the risk of suicide. In contrast, a psychodynamic and psychosocial approach, focused on understanding the underlying psychological dimensions of suicidality, fostering a trusting therapeutic alliance, addressing both internal and external factors contributing to suicidal behaviour, and promoting open dialogue around suicidal thoughts, has shown promise in reducing suicide risk. The findings presented in this paper argue for a rethinking of traditional psychiatric approaches, advocating for a shift toward more personalized, collaborative, and psychologically informed interventions that can more effectively reduce the risk of suicide.

自杀、人格障碍和治疗的问题:另一种心理社会视角。
自杀行为,包括企图自杀和已完成自杀,在全球范围内,特别是在工业化国家不断增加,使自杀成为一个重大的公共卫生问题。尽管美国、欧盟和英国政府和精神卫生机构分配了越来越多的资源,但目前治疗、管理和预防自杀的策略的有效性仍然存在问题。本文回顾了流行病学研究和国家预防政策的证据,以及来自伦敦专家人格障碍治疗中心的研究数据和来自私人精神病学/心理治疗实践的临床案例研究,以探索解决自杀问题的另一种社会心理方法。主要的精神病学模式严重依赖于药物治疗、住院治疗和通常的强制控制方法,可能具有医源性影响,潜在地加剧了自杀的风险。相比之下,心理动力学和社会心理方法侧重于了解自杀的潜在心理层面,培养信任的治疗联盟,解决导致自杀行为的内部和外部因素,并促进围绕自杀想法的公开对话,在降低自杀风险方面显示出希望。本文提出的研究结果主张重新思考传统的精神病学方法,提倡转向更加个性化、协作性和心理知情的干预措施,以更有效地降低自杀风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
18.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信