[Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].

Q3 Medicine
X Y Wang, H X Shen, R H Li, J F Wang, M Fang, K Y Tao, Y H Jiang, Y L Ji
{"title":"[Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].","authors":"X Y Wang, H X Shen, R H Li, J F Wang, M Fang, K Y Tao, Y H Jiang, Y L Ji","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240503-00180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (nCIT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). <b>Methods:</b> Clinical data of patients who received nCRT or nCIT followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced ESCC between January 2010 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, with 155 patients in the nCRT group and 470 patients in the nCIT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in the two groups. After PSM, 120 patients were allocated to the nCRT group and 192 patients to the nCIT group. The pathological response and disease recurrence were compared between the two groups after PSM. Log rank test were used to compare the survival outcomes before and after PSM. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors for locally advanced ESCC. <b>Results:</b> After PSM, the R0 resection rate in the nCRT group and the nCIT group was 93.3% (112/120) and 93.8% (180/192), respectively, with no statistical significance (<i>P</i>=0.884). However, the pathological complete response rate in the nCRT group [36.7% (44/120)] was higher than that in the nCIT group [21.4% (41/192), <i>P</i>=0.003]. For patients with R0 resection, the major recurrence pattern was distant metastasis [18.8% (21/112)] in the nCRT group, while the pattern was locoregional recurrence [12.2% (22/180)] in the nCIT group. The 3-year disease-free survival rates were 52.7% and 66.1% (<i>P</i>=0.022) and the 3-year overall survival rates were 59.2% and 75.5% (<i>P</i>=0.002) in the nCRT and nCIT groups, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis also revealed that the neoadjuvant therapy mode was an independent prognostic factor for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Compared with nCRT, nCIT could significantly prolong disease-free survival (<i>HR</i>=0.58, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.40-0.86) and overall survival (<i>HR</i>=0.53, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.35-0.79). <b>Conclusion:</b> These results suggest that nCIT could significantly improve disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate over nCRT in locally advanced ESCC, even with lower pathological complete response rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 11","pages":"1058-1066"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肿瘤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240503-00180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (nCIT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Clinical data of patients who received nCRT or nCIT followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced ESCC between January 2010 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, with 155 patients in the nCRT group and 470 patients in the nCIT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in the two groups. After PSM, 120 patients were allocated to the nCRT group and 192 patients to the nCIT group. The pathological response and disease recurrence were compared between the two groups after PSM. Log rank test were used to compare the survival outcomes before and after PSM. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors for locally advanced ESCC. Results: After PSM, the R0 resection rate in the nCRT group and the nCIT group was 93.3% (112/120) and 93.8% (180/192), respectively, with no statistical significance (P=0.884). However, the pathological complete response rate in the nCRT group [36.7% (44/120)] was higher than that in the nCIT group [21.4% (41/192), P=0.003]. For patients with R0 resection, the major recurrence pattern was distant metastasis [18.8% (21/112)] in the nCRT group, while the pattern was locoregional recurrence [12.2% (22/180)] in the nCIT group. The 3-year disease-free survival rates were 52.7% and 66.1% (P=0.022) and the 3-year overall survival rates were 59.2% and 75.5% (P=0.002) in the nCRT and nCIT groups, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis also revealed that the neoadjuvant therapy mode was an independent prognostic factor for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Compared with nCRT, nCIT could significantly prolong disease-free survival (HR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.40-0.86) and overall survival (HR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.79). Conclusion: These results suggest that nCIT could significantly improve disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate over nCRT in locally advanced ESCC, even with lower pathological complete response rate.

[局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗免疫治疗]。
目的:比较新辅助放化疗(nCRT)与新辅助化疗-免疫治疗(nCIT)治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的临床疗效。方法:回顾性收集2010年1月至2022年12月浙江肿瘤医院收治的局部晚期ESCC患者的临床资料,其中nCRT组155例,nCIT组470例。两组进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。PSM后,120例患者被分配到nCRT组,192例患者被分配到nCIT组。比较两组PSM术后的病理反应及疾病复发率。采用对数秩检验比较PSM前后的生存结局。进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析,以确定局部晚期ESCC的预后因素。结果:PSM后,nCRT组和nCIT组的R0切除率分别为93.3%(112/120)和93.8%(180/192),差异无统计学意义(P=0.884)。但nCRT组病理完全缓解率[36.7%(44/120)]高于nCIT组[21.4% (41/192)],P=0.003。对于R0切除的患者,nCRT组以远处转移为主[18.8% (21/112)],nCIT组以局部复发为主[12.2%(22/180)]。nCRT组和nCIT组3年无病生存率分别为52.7%和66.1% (P=0.022), 3年总生存率分别为59.2%和75.5% (P=0.002)。多因素Cox回归分析也显示,新辅助治疗方式是局部晚期ESCC患者预后的独立影响因素。与nCRT相比,nCIT可显著延长无病生存期(HR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.40 ~ 0.86)和总生存期(HR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.35 ~ 0.79)。结论:与nCRT相比,nCIT可显著提高局部晚期ESCC的无病生存率和总生存率,但病理完全缓解率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华肿瘤杂志
中华肿瘤杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10433
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信