'Once that's worn off, we could discuss whether you need more': provider perspectives on communicating with patients and other providers about prescription opioids.

Q2 Social Sciences
Margie R Skeer, Grace Hajinazarian, Rachael A Sabelli, Jier Yang, Ken Chui, Michael Booth, Evan Robison, Tamar Boyadjian, Thomas J Stopka
{"title":"'Once that's worn off, we could discuss whether you need more': provider perspectives on communicating with patients and other providers about prescription opioids.","authors":"Margie R Skeer, Grace Hajinazarian, Rachael A Sabelli, Jier Yang, Ken Chui, Michael Booth, Evan Robison, Tamar Boyadjian, Thomas J Stopka","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2024.2431772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescriber-patient communication plays a crucial role in understanding patients' needs, while reducing risks for developing an opioid use disorder (OUD), yet research on this is sparse. As such, the need to understand healthcare providers' skills, comfort, and confidence when discussing opioids with patients and other providers is an important step in balancing patients' needs from a pain perspective and risks from an OUD perspective.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We interviewed 32 Massachusetts providers (physicians, physician associates, nurse practitioners, and dental practitioners) to assess their communication strategies with patients and other providers. Interviews were conducted online (January - September 2021) and were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using deductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contextualized in the Health Education Theory, one major theme was how providers communicated with patients about opioids, including their tone, use of language, and the content they covered. Providers described frequently encountering patients who expressed fears and concerns about opioid addiction and did not want an opioid prescription. Another major theme, related to the ongoing process of preventing problems with opioids was a focus on provider engagement in follow-up, including checking if a prescription was filled, having the patient come back to the office, or calling another provider after a certain duration. Recommendations about communication with patients and other providers were also discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, open, supportive, tailored communication with patients and other providers was deemed essential when considering opioid prescriptions. Further research is recommended to learn about the status of opioid-prescription knowledge, beliefs, and practices within the fourth wave of the current opioid overdose epidemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2024.2431772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prescriber-patient communication plays a crucial role in understanding patients' needs, while reducing risks for developing an opioid use disorder (OUD), yet research on this is sparse. As such, the need to understand healthcare providers' skills, comfort, and confidence when discussing opioids with patients and other providers is an important step in balancing patients' needs from a pain perspective and risks from an OUD perspective.

Method: We interviewed 32 Massachusetts providers (physicians, physician associates, nurse practitioners, and dental practitioners) to assess their communication strategies with patients and other providers. Interviews were conducted online (January - September 2021) and were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using deductive content analysis.

Results: Contextualized in the Health Education Theory, one major theme was how providers communicated with patients about opioids, including their tone, use of language, and the content they covered. Providers described frequently encountering patients who expressed fears and concerns about opioid addiction and did not want an opioid prescription. Another major theme, related to the ongoing process of preventing problems with opioids was a focus on provider engagement in follow-up, including checking if a prescription was filled, having the patient come back to the office, or calling another provider after a certain duration. Recommendations about communication with patients and other providers were also discussed.

Conclusions: Overall, open, supportive, tailored communication with patients and other providers was deemed essential when considering opioid prescriptions. Further research is recommended to learn about the status of opioid-prescription knowledge, beliefs, and practices within the fourth wave of the current opioid overdose epidemic.

“一旦药效消失,我们可以讨论你是否需要更多”:关于与患者和其他提供者就处方阿片类药物进行沟通的提供者观点。
背景:处方-患者沟通在了解患者需求方面起着至关重要的作用,同时降低发生阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的风险,但这方面的研究很少。因此,在与患者和其他提供者讨论阿片类药物时,需要了解医疗保健提供者的技能、舒适度和信心,这是从疼痛角度平衡患者需求和从OUD角度平衡风险的重要一步。方法:我们采访了32名马萨诸塞州的医疗服务提供者(医生、医师助理、执业护士和牙科医生),以评估他们与患者和其他医疗服务提供者的沟通策略。访谈在网上进行(2021年1月至9月),并逐字记录,编码,并使用演绎内容分析进行分析。结果:在健康教育理论的背景下,一个主要主题是提供者如何与患者就阿片类药物进行沟通,包括他们的语气,语言的使用以及他们所涵盖的内容。提供者描述了经常遇到对阿片类药物成瘾表示恐惧和担忧并且不想要阿片类药物处方的患者。与正在进行的预防阿片类药物问题的进程有关的另一个主要主题是,重点关注提供者参与随访,包括检查处方是否已配药,让患者回到办公室,或在一定时间后打电话给另一个提供者。还讨论了与患者和其他提供者沟通的建议。结论:总体而言,在考虑阿片类药物处方时,与患者和其他提供者进行开放,支持和量身定制的沟通被认为是必不可少的。建议进一步研究,以了解当前阿片类药物过量流行的第四波阿片类药物处方知识、信念和做法的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信