Uptake of preventive nutrition interventions among caretakers of children under 5 years in a pastoral setting of South Sudan.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Walter Nehemiah Baluku, Barbara Eva Kirunda Tabusibwa, Ronald Wasswa, Shishay Tsadik, Stella Guwoly Henry, Geoffrey Babughirana, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura
{"title":"Uptake of preventive nutrition interventions among caretakers of children under 5 years in a pastoral setting of South Sudan.","authors":"Walter Nehemiah Baluku, Barbara Eva Kirunda Tabusibwa, Ronald Wasswa, Shishay Tsadik, Stella Guwoly Henry, Geoffrey Babughirana, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura","doi":"10.1186/s40795-024-00963-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventive nutrition interventions (PNI) are usually implemented without understanding how multilevel factors affect uptake. Undernutrition is defined as inadequate intake of nutritious foods. Pastoral populations in conflict settings are seen to have low uptake. The study assessed the level and multiple factors influencing the uptake of PNI in caregivers of under 5 in Kapoeta South County of South Sudan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative approach was employed with an element of a qualitative in a socio-ecological framework. A total of 405 caretakers of CU5 were selected to respond to quantitative household interviews, while qualitative data was collected using KIIs. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires, which were used to attain quantitative data. The data collected through the method of KII were of qualitative type. Using deductive thematic analysis approach, the quantitative data were coded into personal, interpersonal, and community-level factors, and the analysis was done using STATA software version 16. A technique for constructing the uptake level as low, medium, or high was factor analysis. With the result of the binary logistic regression to determine association. Furthermore, semi-structured KIIs were conducted and the qualitative information analyzed thematically to elaborate on the quantitative results.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The uptake level of the Preventive Nutrition Interventions (PNIs) was low at 51. 4%. In the socioecological system, facilitators and barriers related to this uptake differed across the benchmarks of that model. At the community level however, lack of a health facility within the community (OR = 1. 63, C. I. = 1. 02-2. 59) and the time taken before one can access a health facility (OR = 1. 70, C. I = 1. 30-2. 23) showed that accessibility could encourage uptake of PNIs. In the interpersonal dimension, joint decision makers at the family level (OR = 0. 31, C. I = 0. 19-0. 50) had higher uptake. Three factors at the individual level revealed that low uptake was inversely related to caregivers' knowledge of PNIs (OR = 0. 16, C. I. = 0. 10-0. 25), but positively related to having an undernourished child (OR = 2. 59, C. I. = 1. 73-3. 89), as well as number of children in the household (OR = 0. 40, C. I. = 0. 26). KIIs validate that undernutrition and practical issues were the main determinant of PNI uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that caretakers of children under 5 years reported low knowledge of and uptake to preventive nutrition interventions (PNIs) among the pastoral population in South Sudan. Based on the proposed socioecological model, we recommend that PNI approaches need to target multiple levels. At the community level, the focus is on improving access to health facilities and reducing the travel time to these facilities. Another way to increase intervention uptake is to improve spousal-supported joint decisions at the interpersonal level. Enhancing the awareness of the target audience and providing them with relevant information can impact the utilization rates of PNIs at the individual level. Therefore, nutrition stakeholders should employ an approach that targets community, interpersonal, and individual levels with the purpose of increasing PNI uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"10 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00963-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preventive nutrition interventions (PNI) are usually implemented without understanding how multilevel factors affect uptake. Undernutrition is defined as inadequate intake of nutritious foods. Pastoral populations in conflict settings are seen to have low uptake. The study assessed the level and multiple factors influencing the uptake of PNI in caregivers of under 5 in Kapoeta South County of South Sudan.

Methods: A quantitative approach was employed with an element of a qualitative in a socio-ecological framework. A total of 405 caretakers of CU5 were selected to respond to quantitative household interviews, while qualitative data was collected using KIIs. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires, which were used to attain quantitative data. The data collected through the method of KII were of qualitative type. Using deductive thematic analysis approach, the quantitative data were coded into personal, interpersonal, and community-level factors, and the analysis was done using STATA software version 16. A technique for constructing the uptake level as low, medium, or high was factor analysis. With the result of the binary logistic regression to determine association. Furthermore, semi-structured KIIs were conducted and the qualitative information analyzed thematically to elaborate on the quantitative results.

Result: The uptake level of the Preventive Nutrition Interventions (PNIs) was low at 51. 4%. In the socioecological system, facilitators and barriers related to this uptake differed across the benchmarks of that model. At the community level however, lack of a health facility within the community (OR = 1. 63, C. I. = 1. 02-2. 59) and the time taken before one can access a health facility (OR = 1. 70, C. I = 1. 30-2. 23) showed that accessibility could encourage uptake of PNIs. In the interpersonal dimension, joint decision makers at the family level (OR = 0. 31, C. I = 0. 19-0. 50) had higher uptake. Three factors at the individual level revealed that low uptake was inversely related to caregivers' knowledge of PNIs (OR = 0. 16, C. I. = 0. 10-0. 25), but positively related to having an undernourished child (OR = 2. 59, C. I. = 1. 73-3. 89), as well as number of children in the household (OR = 0. 40, C. I. = 0. 26). KIIs validate that undernutrition and practical issues were the main determinant of PNI uptake.

Conclusion: This study found that caretakers of children under 5 years reported low knowledge of and uptake to preventive nutrition interventions (PNIs) among the pastoral population in South Sudan. Based on the proposed socioecological model, we recommend that PNI approaches need to target multiple levels. At the community level, the focus is on improving access to health facilities and reducing the travel time to these facilities. Another way to increase intervention uptake is to improve spousal-supported joint decisions at the interpersonal level. Enhancing the awareness of the target audience and providing them with relevant information can impact the utilization rates of PNIs at the individual level. Therefore, nutrition stakeholders should employ an approach that targets community, interpersonal, and individual levels with the purpose of increasing PNI uptake.

南苏丹牧区5岁以下儿童看护人员采取预防性营养干预措施的情况。
背景:预防性营养干预(PNI)通常在不了解多水平因素如何影响摄取的情况下实施。营养不良被定义为营养食物摄入不足。冲突环境下的牧区人口的吸收率较低。该研究评估了影响南苏丹卡波埃塔南县5岁以下护理人员服用PNI的水平和多种因素。方法:在社会生态框架中采用定量方法与定性元素。本研究共选取405名CU5照顾者进行定量家庭访谈,并使用kii收集定性数据。通过结构化的问卷调查收集原始数据,并通过问卷调查获得定量数据。通过KII方法收集的数据为定性型。采用演绎主题分析方法,将定量数据编码为个人、人际和社区层面的因素,并使用STATA软件版本16进行分析。因子分析是将摄取水平划分为低、中、高的一种技术。用二元逻辑回归的结果来确定关联。此外,还进行了半结构化的知识基础评价,并对定性信息进行了专题分析,以阐述定量结果。结果:51岁儿童对预防性营养干预(PNIs)的摄取水平较低。4%。在社会生态系统中,与这种吸收相关的促进因素和障碍在该模型的各个基准中有所不同。然而,在社区一级,社区内缺乏卫生设施(OR = 1)。63、c. i . = 1。02-2。59)和到达卫生设施所需的时间(OR = 1)。70、c. i = 1。30。23)表明可达性可以促进PNIs的吸收。在人际关系维度上,家庭层面的共同决策者(OR = 0。31、c. i = 0。19-0。50)摄取较高。个体水平的三个因素显示,低摄取与护理人员对PNIs的了解呈负相关(OR = 0)。16、c. i . = 0。以10 - 0的。25),但与儿童营养不良呈正相关(OR = 2)。59、c. i . = 1。73 - 3。89),以及家庭中子女的数量(OR = 0。40、c. i . = 0。26)。kii证实营养不良和实际问题是PNI摄取的主要决定因素。结论:本研究发现,在南苏丹的牧区人口中,5岁以下儿童的看护人报告对预防性营养干预(PNIs)的了解和接受程度较低。基于所提出的社会生态模型,我们建议PNI方法需要针对多个层面。在社区一级,重点是改善获得保健设施的机会并缩短前往这些设施的旅行时间。另一种增加干预的方法是在人际层面上改善配偶支持的共同决策。提高目标受众的认识并向他们提供相关信息可以影响个人层面上pni的利用率。因此,营养利益相关者应该采用一种针对社区、人际和个人水平的方法,以增加PNI的摄取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信