Supporting Patients' Use of Digital Services in Primary Health Care in England: Synthesis of Evidence From a Mixed Methods Study of "Digital Facilitation".

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.2196/52516
Jon Sussex, Helen Atherton, Gary Abel, Christopher Clark, Emma Cockcroft, Brandi Leach, Christine Marriott, Jennifer Newbould, Emma Pitchforth, Rachel Winder, John Campbell
{"title":"Supporting Patients' Use of Digital Services in Primary Health Care in England: Synthesis of Evidence From a Mixed Methods Study of \"Digital Facilitation\".","authors":"Jon Sussex, Helen Atherton, Gary Abel, Christopher Clark, Emma Cockcroft, Brandi Leach, Christine Marriott, Jennifer Newbould, Emma Pitchforth, Rachel Winder, John Campbell","doi":"10.2196/52516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General medical practitioners and other staff at primary care medical practices have an important role in facilitating patient access to online services in the National Health Service in England. These services range from online ordering of repeat prescriptions to conducting online consultations with health care professionals. We have defined \"digital facilitation\" as that range of processes, procedures, and personnel that seeks to support patients in their uptake and use of online services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report how we have synthesized the evidence from a mixed methods study of digital facilitation in primary care in England. The study's objectives were to identify, characterize, and explore the benefits and challenges of different models of digital facilitation in general medical practices in England and to design a framework for evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of digital facilitation interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study comprised scoping review of literature, survey of staff in general practices, survey of patients, and ethnography at case study practices plus stakeholder interviews. We compiled a triangulation matrix of the findings from individual work packages through an iterative process whereby each work package's results were first analyzed separately and were then cumulatively combined across work packages in 3 successive workshops. From the resulting matrix, we developed a program theory and an implementation theory and constructed a framework for evaluations of digital facilitation in primary care. The final step of the synthesis process was to discuss the results with national and regional National Health Service stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triangulation yielded a combined set of findings summarized within 11 thematic groupings: 3 setting the scene within which digital facilitation takes place, and 8 related to different types of digital facilitation, their implementation, and effectiveness. Some thematic groupings were evident in the findings of all 4 of the research work packages; others were not addressed in all the work packages but were evident from those where they were addressed. Throughout the synthesis, there were no instances where findings from one work package contradicted the findings of another. Findings either reinforced each other or offered complementary or additional insights. The discussion at the stakeholder meeting held at the end of the study resulted in the research team clarifying some findings but not changing any of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital facilitation can take many forms, though much of what is currently done in primary care practices in England is reactive and passive. Clear lines of responsibility, digital tools and platforms that work well for patients and practice staff, and investment in staff time and training are all needed if digital facilitation is to deliver on its promise. We propose a framework for future evaluations of the effectiveness and costs of digital facilitation interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e52516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/52516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General medical practitioners and other staff at primary care medical practices have an important role in facilitating patient access to online services in the National Health Service in England. These services range from online ordering of repeat prescriptions to conducting online consultations with health care professionals. We have defined "digital facilitation" as that range of processes, procedures, and personnel that seeks to support patients in their uptake and use of online services.

Objective: We report how we have synthesized the evidence from a mixed methods study of digital facilitation in primary care in England. The study's objectives were to identify, characterize, and explore the benefits and challenges of different models of digital facilitation in general medical practices in England and to design a framework for evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of digital facilitation interventions.

Methods: Our study comprised scoping review of literature, survey of staff in general practices, survey of patients, and ethnography at case study practices plus stakeholder interviews. We compiled a triangulation matrix of the findings from individual work packages through an iterative process whereby each work package's results were first analyzed separately and were then cumulatively combined across work packages in 3 successive workshops. From the resulting matrix, we developed a program theory and an implementation theory and constructed a framework for evaluations of digital facilitation in primary care. The final step of the synthesis process was to discuss the results with national and regional National Health Service stakeholders.

Results: Triangulation yielded a combined set of findings summarized within 11 thematic groupings: 3 setting the scene within which digital facilitation takes place, and 8 related to different types of digital facilitation, their implementation, and effectiveness. Some thematic groupings were evident in the findings of all 4 of the research work packages; others were not addressed in all the work packages but were evident from those where they were addressed. Throughout the synthesis, there were no instances where findings from one work package contradicted the findings of another. Findings either reinforced each other or offered complementary or additional insights. The discussion at the stakeholder meeting held at the end of the study resulted in the research team clarifying some findings but not changing any of them.

Conclusions: Digital facilitation can take many forms, though much of what is currently done in primary care practices in England is reactive and passive. Clear lines of responsibility, digital tools and platforms that work well for patients and practice staff, and investment in staff time and training are all needed if digital facilitation is to deliver on its promise. We propose a framework for future evaluations of the effectiveness and costs of digital facilitation interventions.

支持患者在英格兰初级卫生保健中使用数字服务:来自“数字促进”混合方法研究的证据综合
背景:全科医生和初级保健医疗实践的其他工作人员在促进英国国民健康服务中患者获得在线服务方面发挥着重要作用。这些服务范围从网上订购重复处方到与卫生保健专业人员进行网上咨询。我们将“数字便利”定义为旨在支持患者接受和使用在线服务的一系列流程、程序和人员。目的:我们报告了我们如何从英格兰初级保健数字促进的混合方法研究中综合证据。该研究的目的是确定、描述和探索英国普通医疗实践中不同数字促进模式的好处和挑战,并设计一个评估数字促进干预措施的有效性和成本的框架。方法:我们的研究包括文献的范围审查,对全科医生的调查,对病人的调查,以及对案例研究实践和利益相关者访谈的人种学研究。我们通过一个迭代的过程编译了来自单个工作包的发现的三角矩阵,在这个过程中,每个工作包的结果首先被单独分析,然后在3个连续的研讨会中累积地组合在工作包中。从得到的矩阵中,我们发展了一个程序理论和一个实施理论,并构建了一个评估初级保健中数字促进的框架。综合进程的最后一步是与国家和地区国民保健服务利益攸关方讨论结果。结果:三角测量产生了一组综合的调查结果,总结为11个专题分组:3个设置了数字促进发生的场景,8个涉及不同类型的数字促进及其实施和有效性。在所有4个研究工作包的调查结果中,一些专题分组是明显的;其他的工作包没有在所有工作包中提到,但从提到的工作包中可以明显看出。在整个综合过程中,没有一个工作包的结论与另一个工作包的结论相矛盾的情况。研究结果要么相互加强,要么提供互补或额外的见解。在研究结束时举行的利益相关者会议上的讨论导致研究小组澄清了一些发现,但没有改变任何发现。结论:数字促进可以采取多种形式,尽管目前在英格兰的初级保健实践中所做的大部分是被动和被动的。如果要实现数字化便利化的承诺,就需要明确的责任界限、对患者和执业人员有效的数字工具和平台,以及对员工时间和培训的投资。我们提出了一个框架,用于未来评估数字促进干预措施的有效性和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信