Community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals: a qualitative systematic review.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kieko Iida, Mina Ishimaru, Mayuko Tsujimura, Ayumi Wakasugi
{"title":"Community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Kieko Iida, Mina Ishimaru, Mayuko Tsujimura, Ayumi Wakasugi","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to examine community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of health care professionals initiating advance care planning for patients has been reported; however, because of the shift from institutionalized to community care, community-dwelling older people have fewer opportunities to discuss these plans with health care professionals compared with those living in other settings. The timely initiation of advance care planning and sustainable discussions among older people, their families, and community health care professionals is necessary and may improve palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies with participants aged 60 years and older who have experience with advance care planning and live in their own homes in the community were included. We considered qualitative studies and the qualitative component of mixed methods studies published between January 1999 and April 2023 in English or Japanese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, JSTORE, Scopus, Japan Medical Abstract Society, and CiNii were searched for published papers, and Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and MedNar were searched for unpublished papers and gray literature. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI approach and JBI standardized tools. Findings were pooled using a meta-aggregation approach. The synthesized findings were graded using the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research syntheses and presented in a Summary of Findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the review. Each study's total score was between 6 and 8 out of 10 on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. We extracted 28 findings and aggregated them into 7 categories, generating 3 synthesized findings: i) A trusting relationship with health professionals is essential for older people's decision-making. Health professionals' attitudes, knowledge, and skills play a role in this, influencing the perceived quality of care; ii) Shared decision-making and patient-centered communication are essential. Older people feel ambiguity toward end-of-life decision and advance care planning and they want their wishes to be heard in any situation to maintain their autonomy and quality of life; iii) Older people need the appropriate forms and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Qualitative studies on community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals are scarce. The experiences have illustrated that trusting relationships influence people's perception of the quality of care they receive; there is uncertainty about their future; and they have varying feelings or attitudes toward their impending death, including denial and avoidance. This review highlighted the need for appropriate forms, and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning; thus, an approach that meets the individual's health and psychosocial status should be selected carefully. Further research is recommended to include older populations from broader geographical and cultural backgrounds and to assess and evaluate the different advance care planning approaches and their implementation processes among groups of community-dwelling older people with different health and psychosocial statuses.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42020122803.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to examine community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals.

Introduction: The importance of health care professionals initiating advance care planning for patients has been reported; however, because of the shift from institutionalized to community care, community-dwelling older people have fewer opportunities to discuss these plans with health care professionals compared with those living in other settings. The timely initiation of advance care planning and sustainable discussions among older people, their families, and community health care professionals is necessary and may improve palliative and end-of-life care.

Inclusion criteria: Studies with participants aged 60 years and older who have experience with advance care planning and live in their own homes in the community were included. We considered qualitative studies and the qualitative component of mixed methods studies published between January 1999 and April 2023 in English or Japanese.

Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, JSTORE, Scopus, Japan Medical Abstract Society, and CiNii were searched for published papers, and Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and MedNar were searched for unpublished papers and gray literature. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI approach and JBI standardized tools. Findings were pooled using a meta-aggregation approach. The synthesized findings were graded using the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research syntheses and presented in a Summary of Findings.

Results: Five studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the review. Each study's total score was between 6 and 8 out of 10 on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. We extracted 28 findings and aggregated them into 7 categories, generating 3 synthesized findings: i) A trusting relationship with health professionals is essential for older people's decision-making. Health professionals' attitudes, knowledge, and skills play a role in this, influencing the perceived quality of care; ii) Shared decision-making and patient-centered communication are essential. Older people feel ambiguity toward end-of-life decision and advance care planning and they want their wishes to be heard in any situation to maintain their autonomy and quality of life; iii) Older people need the appropriate forms and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning.

Conclusion: Qualitative studies on community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals are scarce. The experiences have illustrated that trusting relationships influence people's perception of the quality of care they receive; there is uncertainty about their future; and they have varying feelings or attitudes toward their impending death, including denial and avoidance. This review highlighted the need for appropriate forms, and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning; thus, an approach that meets the individual's health and psychosocial status should be selected carefully. Further research is recommended to include older populations from broader geographical and cultural backgrounds and to assess and evaluate the different advance care planning approaches and their implementation processes among groups of community-dwelling older people with different health and psychosocial statuses.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020122803.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信