Amaxsell Thiago Barros de Souza, Maria Letícia de Lima Machado, Ayane Cristine Alves Sarmento, Ana Paula Ferreira Costa, Tatiana Xavier da Costa, Kleyton Santos de Medeiros, Adson José Martins Vale, Ricardo Ney Cobucci, Rand Randall Martins
{"title":"Magnesium sulfate versus nifedipine for tocolysis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Amaxsell Thiago Barros de Souza, Maria Letícia de Lima Machado, Ayane Cristine Alves Sarmento, Ana Paula Ferreira Costa, Tatiana Xavier da Costa, Kleyton Santos de Medeiros, Adson José Martins Vale, Ricardo Ney Cobucci, Rand Randall Martins","doi":"10.1080/03630242.2024.2436414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preterm labor, defined as contractions occurring every 5-10 minutes with cervical changes before the 37th week of estimated gestation, is a significant cause of perinatal mortality. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulfate compared to nifedipine in managing preterm labor. The systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023422419). Manuscripts published up to September 2024 were systematically searched in databases. Dichotomous data were pooled as odds ratios using a random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method, while continuous data were analyzed as mean ± standard deviation values, mean differences, and standardized mean differences using inverse-variance fixed-effects analysis. Fifteen randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included, enrolling a total of 2,186 pregnant women. Nifedipine showed a greater effect compared to a 4-gram IV dose of magnesium sulfate. However, the efficacy of these tocolytics in prolonging pregnancy by 48 hours did not significantly differ between nifedipine and a 6-gram IV dose of magnesium sulfate. Additionally, magnesium sulfate was associated with more adverse drug reactions. The moderate certainty of evidence found here requires confirmation in large, adequately powered RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23972,"journal":{"name":"Women & Health","volume":" ","pages":"29-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2024.2436414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Preterm labor, defined as contractions occurring every 5-10 minutes with cervical changes before the 37th week of estimated gestation, is a significant cause of perinatal mortality. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulfate compared to nifedipine in managing preterm labor. The systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023422419). Manuscripts published up to September 2024 were systematically searched in databases. Dichotomous data were pooled as odds ratios using a random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method, while continuous data were analyzed as mean ± standard deviation values, mean differences, and standardized mean differences using inverse-variance fixed-effects analysis. Fifteen randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included, enrolling a total of 2,186 pregnant women. Nifedipine showed a greater effect compared to a 4-gram IV dose of magnesium sulfate. However, the efficacy of these tocolytics in prolonging pregnancy by 48 hours did not significantly differ between nifedipine and a 6-gram IV dose of magnesium sulfate. Additionally, magnesium sulfate was associated with more adverse drug reactions. The moderate certainty of evidence found here requires confirmation in large, adequately powered RCTs.
期刊介绍:
Women & Health publishes original papers and critical reviews containing highly useful information for researchers, policy planners, and all providers of health care for women. These papers cover findings from studies concerning health and illness and physical and psychological well-being of women, as well as the environmental, lifestyle and sociocultural factors that are associated with health and disease, which have implications for prevention, early detection and treatment, limitation of disability and rehabilitation.