Accuracy and Value of Time-resolved MRA for Spinal Vascular Malformations.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005233
Xiao-Er Wei, Jin-Yu Zhu, Ming-Hua Li, Jianyong Wei, Liming Wei, Yueqi Zhu, Yuehua Li
{"title":"Accuracy and Value of Time-resolved MRA for Spinal Vascular Malformations.","authors":"Xiao-Er Wei, Jin-Yu Zhu, Ming-Hua Li, Jianyong Wei, Liming Wei, Yueqi Zhu, Yuehua Li","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the value of time-resolved CE-MRA in evaluating and locating the SVM prior to digital subtraction angiography (DSA).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Spinal vascular malformations (SVM) can be detected with time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA(CE-MRA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>178 patients with suspected SVM who underwent time-resolved CE-MRA examination and DSA were included in this study. DSA served as the reference standard. The type of SVM, feeding arteries, fistula/nidus, and proximal segment of draining veins were evaluated on time-resolved CE-MRA. The diagnostic performance and classification performance of time-resolved CE-MRA in the diagnosis of SVM is summarized in terms of overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). The difference of catheterized vessels during spinal vascular DSA between actual and estimated number was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>147 patients were diagnosed with SVM (20 cervical, 118 thoracolumbar, and 9 deep lumbosacral) and 31 patients were diagnosed with non-SVM according to DSA findings. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of time-resolved CE-MRA for subtype of SVM were 0.961, 0.961, 0.993, 0.806 and 0.961, respectively. The overall accuracy of time-resolved CE-MRA for the diagnosis of SVM was 0.821, and was 0.783, 0.793, and 0.778 for cervical, thoracolumbar, and deep lumbosacral SVM, respectively. The actual number of catheterized vessels during spinal vascular DSA with time-resolved CE-MRA as the reference was lower than the estimated number of catheterized vessels in both SVM and non-SVM patients (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Time-resolved CE-MRA could accurately evaluate SVM and reduce the number of catheterized vessels during spinal vascular DSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective.

Objective: To explore the value of time-resolved CE-MRA in evaluating and locating the SVM prior to digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Summary of background data: Spinal vascular malformations (SVM) can be detected with time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA(CE-MRA).

Materials and methods: 178 patients with suspected SVM who underwent time-resolved CE-MRA examination and DSA were included in this study. DSA served as the reference standard. The type of SVM, feeding arteries, fistula/nidus, and proximal segment of draining veins were evaluated on time-resolved CE-MRA. The diagnostic performance and classification performance of time-resolved CE-MRA in the diagnosis of SVM is summarized in terms of overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). The difference of catheterized vessels during spinal vascular DSA between actual and estimated number was also analyzed.

Results: 147 patients were diagnosed with SVM (20 cervical, 118 thoracolumbar, and 9 deep lumbosacral) and 31 patients were diagnosed with non-SVM according to DSA findings. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of time-resolved CE-MRA for subtype of SVM were 0.961, 0.961, 0.993, 0.806 and 0.961, respectively. The overall accuracy of time-resolved CE-MRA for the diagnosis of SVM was 0.821, and was 0.783, 0.793, and 0.778 for cervical, thoracolumbar, and deep lumbosacral SVM, respectively. The actual number of catheterized vessels during spinal vascular DSA with time-resolved CE-MRA as the reference was lower than the estimated number of catheterized vessels in both SVM and non-SVM patients (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Time-resolved CE-MRA could accurately evaluate SVM and reduce the number of catheterized vessels during spinal vascular DSA.

时间分辨磁共振成像对脊柱血管畸形的准确性和价值。
研究设计:回顾性。目的:探讨时间分辨CE-MRA在数字减影血管造影(DSA)前评估和定位SVM的价值。背景资料总结:时间分辨对比增强MRA(CE-MRA)可以检测出脊柱血管畸形(SVM)。材料与方法:本研究纳入178例经时间分辨CE-MRA检查和DSA检查的疑似SVM患者。DSA作为参考标准。时间分辨CE-MRA评价支持向量机类型、供血动脉、瘘/病灶、引流静脉近段。从总体准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)等方面总结时间分辨CE-MRA在SVM诊断中的诊断性能和分类性能。分析了脊髓血管DSA中导管导管的实际数目与预估数目的差异。结果:根据DSA结果,147例患者被诊断为SVM(20例颈椎,118例胸腰椎,9例腰骶深),31例患者被诊断为非SVM。时间分辨CE-MRA对SVM亚型的诊断敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和准确性分别为0.961、0.961、0.993、0.806和0.961。时间分辨CE-MRA对SVM诊断的总体准确率为0.821,对颈椎、胸腰椎和腰骶深段SVM诊断的总体准确率分别为0.783、0.793和0.778。以时间分辨CE-MRA为参考的脊髓血管DSA中,支持向量机和非支持向量机患者的实际置管血管数均低于预估置管血管数(p结论:时间分辨CE-MRA可以准确评估支持向量机,减少脊髓血管DSA中置管血管数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信