Patient perceptions of the Finnish guidelines enabling coeliac disease diagnosis without biopsies in adults.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hanna Sareila, Kalle Kurppa, Heini Huhtala, Pilvi Laurikka, Sanna Arnala, Tuomas Koskela, Katri Kaukinen, Laura Kivelä
{"title":"Patient perceptions of the Finnish guidelines enabling coeliac disease diagnosis without biopsies in adults.","authors":"Hanna Sareila, Kalle Kurppa, Heini Huhtala, Pilvi Laurikka, Sanna Arnala, Tuomas Koskela, Katri Kaukinen, Laura Kivelä","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2431628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diagnosis of coeliac disease based on serology only has been allowed since 2018 in Finland for adults meeting specific criteria. We studied the patient experiences and perceptions of this novel diagnostic option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Altogether 194 adult patients were questioned on socio-demographic and health-related characteristics, quality of life and various coeliac disease-related issues. The results were compared between patients diagnosed with intestinal biopsy or based on serology only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether 69 (36%) of the patients were diagnosed without duodenal biopsies. They were younger (median 43 vs. 51 years, <i>p</i> = 0.046), diagnosed more recently (2021 vs. 2020, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and more often in primary health care (78% vs. 43%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), had fewer esophageal symptoms at diagnosis (17% vs. 30%, <i>p</i> = 0.046) and considered the diagnostic process easier (49% vs. 30%, <i>p</i> = 0.032) than those diagnosed by duodenal biopsy (<i>n</i> = 125). The no-biopsy group received less often dietician follow-up (4% vs. 17%, <i>p</i> = 0.012), reported more persistent symptoms (36% vs. 21%, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and experienced more stress due to the diet (68% vs. 47%, <i>p</i> = 0.039). Symptom persistence or stress were not associated with year of diagnosis or dietician follow-up. The groups were comparable in socio-economic characteristics, general health, quality of life, diagnostic delay, dietician guidance at diagnosis, and dietary adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The non-invasive approach resulted in de-centralized diagnosis and easier patient-experienced diagnostic process of coeliac disease, but was associated with increased risk for persistent symptoms and stress due to gluten-free diet. These results highlight the significance of appropriate patient guidance and support regardless of the diagnostic strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2431628","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnosis of coeliac disease based on serology only has been allowed since 2018 in Finland for adults meeting specific criteria. We studied the patient experiences and perceptions of this novel diagnostic option.

Methods: Altogether 194 adult patients were questioned on socio-demographic and health-related characteristics, quality of life and various coeliac disease-related issues. The results were compared between patients diagnosed with intestinal biopsy or based on serology only.

Results: Altogether 69 (36%) of the patients were diagnosed without duodenal biopsies. They were younger (median 43 vs. 51 years, p = 0.046), diagnosed more recently (2021 vs. 2020, p < 0.001) and more often in primary health care (78% vs. 43%, p = 0.001), had fewer esophageal symptoms at diagnosis (17% vs. 30%, p = 0.046) and considered the diagnostic process easier (49% vs. 30%, p = 0.032) than those diagnosed by duodenal biopsy (n = 125). The no-biopsy group received less often dietician follow-up (4% vs. 17%, p = 0.012), reported more persistent symptoms (36% vs. 21%, p = 0.026) and experienced more stress due to the diet (68% vs. 47%, p = 0.039). Symptom persistence or stress were not associated with year of diagnosis or dietician follow-up. The groups were comparable in socio-economic characteristics, general health, quality of life, diagnostic delay, dietician guidance at diagnosis, and dietary adherence.

Conclusions: The non-invasive approach resulted in de-centralized diagnosis and easier patient-experienced diagnostic process of coeliac disease, but was associated with increased risk for persistent symptoms and stress due to gluten-free diet. These results highlight the significance of appropriate patient guidance and support regardless of the diagnostic strategy.

患者对芬兰指南的看法,使成人乳糜泻诊断无需活检。
目的:自2018年起,芬兰允许仅根据血清学诊断符合特定标准的成年人乳糜泻。我们研究了患者的经验和这种新的诊断选择的看法。方法:对194例成年患者进行社会人口学和健康相关特征、生活质量和各种乳糜泻相关问题的调查。结果在诊断为肠道活检或仅基于血清学的患者之间进行比较。结果:69例(36%)患者未经十二指肠活检确诊。他们更年轻(中位年龄为43岁对51岁,p = 0.046),诊断时间较晚(2021年对2020年,p = 0.001),诊断时食管症状较少(17%对30%,p = 0.046),并且认为诊断过程比十二指肠活检诊断(n = 125)更容易(49%对30%,p = 0.032)。无活检组接受较少的营养学家随访(4%对17%,p = 0.012),报告的持续症状更多(36%对21%,p = 0.026),并且由于饮食而经历更多的压力(68%对47%,p = 0.039)。症状持续或压力与诊断年份或营养师随访无关。两组在社会经济特征、一般健康状况、生活质量、诊断延迟、诊断时营养师指导和饮食依从性方面具有可比性。结论:无创入路导致乳糜泻的分散诊断和更容易患者体验的诊断过程,但与无麸质饮食导致的持续症状和压力的风险增加相关。这些结果强调了适当的患者指导和支持的重要性,无论诊断策略如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信