Exploring sociodemographic moderators of the association between sleep duration and self-rated health.

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Sleep and Breathing Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1007/s11325-024-03199-7

Olatokunbo Osibogun

{"title":"Exploring sociodemographic moderators of the association between sleep duration and self-rated health.","authors":"Olatokunbo Osibogun","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03199-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study examined the association of sleep duration with self-rated health (SRH) and if age, sex, and race/ethnicity modifies this association.Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 396,455 adults who were aged ≥ 18 years in the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sleep duration was categorized into three: short (< 7 h), normal (7-9 h; reference), and long (> 9 h). SRH was dichotomized into suboptimal (fair/poor; reference) and optimal (excellent/very good/good). Logistic regression models were employed to investigate the association and assess interactions of age, sex, and race/ethnicity with sleep duration.Results: Short (adjusted odds ratio: 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.66-0.74]) and long (0.65 [0.58-0.73]) sleep duration was associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH. There was a significant interaction between age and sleep duration (p = 0.029). The association between short sleep duration and SRH was strongest in the youngest age (18-24; 0.59 [0.47-0.74]), while 35-44 (0.57 [0.39-0.82] had the strongest association for long sleep duration with SRH. No significant interactions were found for sex (p = 0.314) or race/ethnicity (p = 0.930).Conclusion: Short and long sleep duration are associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH among US adults. Prioritizing sleep hygiene across all ages may improve SRH.","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03199-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the association of sleep duration with self-rated health (SRH) and if age, sex, and race/ethnicity modifies this association.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 396,455 adults who were aged ≥ 18 years in the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sleep duration was categorized into three: short (< 7 h), normal (7-9 h; reference), and long (> 9 h). SRH was dichotomized into suboptimal (fair/poor; reference) and optimal (excellent/very good/good). Logistic regression models were employed to investigate the association and assess interactions of age, sex, and race/ethnicity with sleep duration.

Results: Short (adjusted odds ratio: 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.66-0.74]) and long (0.65 [0.58-0.73]) sleep duration was associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH. There was a significant interaction between age and sleep duration (p = 0.029). The association between short sleep duration and SRH was strongest in the youngest age (18-24; 0.59 [0.47-0.74]), while 35-44 (0.57 [0.39-0.82] had the strongest association for long sleep duration with SRH. No significant interactions were found for sex (p = 0.314) or race/ethnicity (p = 0.930).

Conclusion: Short and long sleep duration are associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH among US adults. Prioritizing sleep hygiene across all ages may improve SRH.

查看原文本刊更多论文

探索睡眠持续时间与自评健康之间关系的社会人口统计学调节因子。

目的：本研究考察了睡眠时间与自评健康（SRH）的关系，以及年龄、性别和种族/民族是否会改变这种关系。方法：对2020年行为危险因素监测系统中年龄≥18岁的396,455名成年人进行横断面分析。睡眠时间分为三种：短（9小时）。睡眠质量分为次优(一般/较差；参考文献)和最佳的（优秀/非常好/好）。采用Logistic回归模型调查年龄、性别和种族/民族与睡眠时间的关系并评估其相互作用。结果：较短的睡眠时间（校正优势比：0.70[95%可信区间0.66-0.74]）和较长的睡眠时间（0.65[0.58-0.73]）与最佳SRH的几率降低相关。年龄与睡眠时间之间存在显著的交互作用（p = 0.029）。短睡眠时间与SRH之间的关联在最年轻的年龄段(18-24岁；0.59[0.47-0.74])，而35-44（0.57[0.39-0.82]）与SRH的相关性最强。性别（p = 0.314）和种族/民族（p = 0.930）之间没有发现显著的相互作用。结论：在美国成年人中，睡眠时间长短与最佳SRH的几率降低有关。优先考虑所有年龄段的睡眠卫生可能会改善SRH。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sleep and Breathing 医学-呼吸系统

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

4.00%

发文量

222

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep. Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.