Empathetic solicitude attenuates the affective and sensory dimensions of CO2-induced dyspnea: A randomized parallel arm experimental trial in healthy humans.
Nathalie Nion, Marie-Cécile Niérat, Sophie Lavault, Noémie Simon-Tillaux, Antoine Guerder, Pierre-Yves Blanchard, Capucine Morélot-Panzini, Laure Serresse, Thomas Similowski
{"title":"Empathetic solicitude attenuates the affective and sensory dimensions of CO<sub>2</sub>-induced dyspnea: A randomized parallel arm experimental trial in healthy humans.","authors":"Nathalie Nion, Marie-Cécile Niérat, Sophie Lavault, Noémie Simon-Tillaux, Antoine Guerder, Pierre-Yves Blanchard, Capucine Morélot-Panzini, Laure Serresse, Thomas Similowski","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dyspnea testifies to profound suffering in patients and its relief is a priority for caregivers. This can be achieved by correcting causative disorders (\"etiopathogenic\" approach) or targeting the dyspnea itself (\"symptomatic\" approach), as is done for pain. Empathetic solicitude from caregivers has an intrinsic analgesic effect, but its effects on dyspnea have not been formally documented. This study tests the hypothesis that the empathetic solicitude behavior of a caregiver during experimental induction of acute and intense dyspnea would have a mitigating effect. In a double-blind, randomized, controlled experimental trial, 80 healthy participants were assigned to a neutral behavior arm or a solicitude behavior arm. During two successive visits (V1 and V2), dyspnea was induced through CO<sub>2</sub>-rebreathing and (i) assessed in an immediate manner using 10 cm affective and sensory visual analog scales (A-VAS and S-VAS) and (ii) post hoc using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP). A-VAS ratings at the end of the dyspnea challenge were significantly lower at V2 in the \"solicitude behavior\" arm than in the \"neutral behavior\" arm (6.69 [3.825-9.67] vs. 8.05 [6.43-10], p = 0.039). There were no significant differences between arms regarding S-VAS. MDP analysis showed that CO<sub>2</sub>-rebreathing induced dyspnea of the air hunger type, with statistically significant reductions in its intensity and both the sensory and affective dimensions of dyspnea. This study shows that empathetic solicitude can reduce the affective and sensory dimensions of experimentally induced dyspnea in healthy volunteers. Future studies should evaluate the impact of empathetic solicitude on clinical dyspnea.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e14740"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dyspnea testifies to profound suffering in patients and its relief is a priority for caregivers. This can be achieved by correcting causative disorders ("etiopathogenic" approach) or targeting the dyspnea itself ("symptomatic" approach), as is done for pain. Empathetic solicitude from caregivers has an intrinsic analgesic effect, but its effects on dyspnea have not been formally documented. This study tests the hypothesis that the empathetic solicitude behavior of a caregiver during experimental induction of acute and intense dyspnea would have a mitigating effect. In a double-blind, randomized, controlled experimental trial, 80 healthy participants were assigned to a neutral behavior arm or a solicitude behavior arm. During two successive visits (V1 and V2), dyspnea was induced through CO2-rebreathing and (i) assessed in an immediate manner using 10 cm affective and sensory visual analog scales (A-VAS and S-VAS) and (ii) post hoc using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP). A-VAS ratings at the end of the dyspnea challenge were significantly lower at V2 in the "solicitude behavior" arm than in the "neutral behavior" arm (6.69 [3.825-9.67] vs. 8.05 [6.43-10], p = 0.039). There were no significant differences between arms regarding S-VAS. MDP analysis showed that CO2-rebreathing induced dyspnea of the air hunger type, with statistically significant reductions in its intensity and both the sensory and affective dimensions of dyspnea. This study shows that empathetic solicitude can reduce the affective and sensory dimensions of experimentally induced dyspnea in healthy volunteers. Future studies should evaluate the impact of empathetic solicitude on clinical dyspnea.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.