Mehmet Yilmaz, Mustafa Karaaslan, Mehmet Emin Şirin, Halil Çağrı Aybal, Muhammed Emin Polat, Senol Tonyali, Gencay Hatiboglu
{"title":"Salvage irreversible electroporation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy: a systematic review.","authors":"Mehmet Yilmaz, Mustafa Karaaslan, Mehmet Emin Şirin, Halil Çağrı Aybal, Muhammed Emin Polat, Senol Tonyali, Gencay Hatiboglu","doi":"10.1038/s41391-024-00926-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To systematically evaluate the available evidence regarding the effect of salvage irreversible electroporation (IRE) in patients with local recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive radiotherapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed-MEDLINE and the Web of Science. The following search terms were used: \"irreversible electroporation AND recurrent prostate cancer\", ''salvage irreversible electroporation AND prostate cancer AND radiation\", \"nanoknife AND recurrent prostate cancer\", and ''salvage irreversible electroporation AND prostate cancer\" by combining PICO (population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5 eligible studies. Following IRE, local oncological control was ranging from 67 to 78%. In-field and out-field lesion recurrences after IRE were ranging from 3 to 10% and from 8 to 14%, respectively. Only one study reported an overall metastasis-free survival rate of 91% and a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 60%. The post-IRE continence status ranged 73-100%. Two studies reported a decline in the proportion of patients maintaining erections sufficient for sexual intercourse and two studies reported 50% preservation of erection. The majority of complications were of a low-to-mild nature, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade I-II, with the exception of the development of a rectal fistula in a single case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IRE represents an alternative salvage treatment option for patients with localised recurrent PCa following RT. The procedure offers a favourable safety profile and effective preservation of urinary function. The oncological results are promising, but further investigation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":20727,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00926-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To systematically evaluate the available evidence regarding the effect of salvage irreversible electroporation (IRE) in patients with local recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive radiotherapy (RT).
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed-MEDLINE and the Web of Science. The following search terms were used: "irreversible electroporation AND recurrent prostate cancer", ''salvage irreversible electroporation AND prostate cancer AND radiation", "nanoknife AND recurrent prostate cancer", and ''salvage irreversible electroporation AND prostate cancer" by combining PICO (population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) terms.
Results: We identified 5 eligible studies. Following IRE, local oncological control was ranging from 67 to 78%. In-field and out-field lesion recurrences after IRE were ranging from 3 to 10% and from 8 to 14%, respectively. Only one study reported an overall metastasis-free survival rate of 91% and a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 60%. The post-IRE continence status ranged 73-100%. Two studies reported a decline in the proportion of patients maintaining erections sufficient for sexual intercourse and two studies reported 50% preservation of erection. The majority of complications were of a low-to-mild nature, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade I-II, with the exception of the development of a rectal fistula in a single case.
Conclusions: IRE represents an alternative salvage treatment option for patients with localised recurrent PCa following RT. The procedure offers a favourable safety profile and effective preservation of urinary function. The oncological results are promising, but further investigation is required.
期刊介绍:
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases covers all aspects of prostatic diseases, in particular prostate cancer, the subject of intensive basic and clinical research world-wide. The journal also reports on exciting new developments being made in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases is of interest to surgeons, oncologists and clinicians treating patients and to those involved in research into diseases of the prostate. The journal covers the three main areas - prostate cancer, male LUTS and prostatitis.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases publishes original research articles, reviews, topical comment and critical appraisals of scientific meetings and the latest books. The journal also contains a calendar of forthcoming scientific meetings. The Editors and a distinguished Editorial Board ensure that submitted articles receive fast and efficient attention and are refereed to the highest possible scientific standard. A fast track system is available for topical articles of particular significance.