[Everything can - nothing must? Peer support on acute psychiatric wards].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Celina Stolz, Anna Oster, Klara Czernin, Josef Baumgartner, Julia Junghanss, Lieselotte Mahler
{"title":"[Everything can - nothing must? Peer support on acute psychiatric wards].","authors":"Celina Stolz, Anna Oster, Klara Czernin, Josef Baumgartner, Julia Junghanss, Lieselotte Mahler","doi":"10.1055/a-2447-6831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer support is recommended for improving acute psychiatric care, but research is lacking. This qualitative study examines the impact, particularly on coercive measures, through semi-structured interviews with four peers, four patients, and twelve (non-peer) staff members from two acute psychiatric wards. Analysis shows that peers experience unique opportunities and challenges in this context. Their effects include mediating between patients and the team, normalizing daily activities on the wards, promoting social interactions, fostering understanding and trust through shared experiences, as well as instilling hope and self-efficacy. Other staff members benefit from the exchange of patient information, task delegation, increased awareness of stigmatization, and promotion of a recovery-oriented mindset. While peers do not directly influence coercive measures, they contribute to de-escalation. Specific framework conditions are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2447-6831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer support is recommended for improving acute psychiatric care, but research is lacking. This qualitative study examines the impact, particularly on coercive measures, through semi-structured interviews with four peers, four patients, and twelve (non-peer) staff members from two acute psychiatric wards. Analysis shows that peers experience unique opportunities and challenges in this context. Their effects include mediating between patients and the team, normalizing daily activities on the wards, promoting social interactions, fostering understanding and trust through shared experiences, as well as instilling hope and self-efficacy. Other staff members benefit from the exchange of patient information, task delegation, increased awareness of stigmatization, and promotion of a recovery-oriented mindset. While peers do not directly influence coercive measures, they contribute to de-escalation. Specific framework conditions are necessary.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信