Lena Oliveros, Hector Valdivia, Colin Crook, Lori Rutman, Surabhi Vora, Dwight Barry, Lauren Rakes
{"title":"Equity-Focused Interventions Improve Interpreter Use in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Lena Oliveros, Hector Valdivia, Colin Crook, Lori Rutman, Surabhi Vora, Dwight Barry, Lauren Rakes","doi":"10.1542/peds.2023-065427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Federal guidelines and equitable care mandate that patients who use a language other than English receive interpretation in their preferred language. Substantial variability exists in interpreter use in intensive care settings. We aimed to increase the rate of interpretations in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through a series of targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team developed a key driver diagram to identify areas for focused intervention. Each plan-do-study-act cycle informed the next cycle of interventions, targeting increasing interpreter (video, phone, and in-person) use. Interventions included standardizing technology, standardizing placement of interpretation devices in patient rooms, provider education, and creating accountability systems of interpreter use by care providers. We reviewed data from PICU encounters between January 2018 and January 2022 and used summary statistics and statistical process control methods to measure the impact of our interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 882 patient encounters over the 4-year study period. Demographic characteristics were similar in the preintervention and postintervention periods. The total interpretation rate increased to 2.7 interpretations per patient per day from a baseline rate of 1.4. Each individual interpretation modality demonstrated increases in use. Average time spent interpreting via phone increased from 8 to 10.5 minutes per patient per day, and average time spent interpreting via video went from 9.5 to 22 minutes per patient per day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Iterative quality improvement methodology effectively identified barriers to equitable care, guided development of focused interventions, and improved interpreter use among pediatric patients who were critically ill.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-065427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Federal guidelines and equitable care mandate that patients who use a language other than English receive interpretation in their preferred language. Substantial variability exists in interpreter use in intensive care settings. We aimed to increase the rate of interpretations in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through a series of targeted interventions.
Methods: A multidisciplinary team developed a key driver diagram to identify areas for focused intervention. Each plan-do-study-act cycle informed the next cycle of interventions, targeting increasing interpreter (video, phone, and in-person) use. Interventions included standardizing technology, standardizing placement of interpretation devices in patient rooms, provider education, and creating accountability systems of interpreter use by care providers. We reviewed data from PICU encounters between January 2018 and January 2022 and used summary statistics and statistical process control methods to measure the impact of our interventions.
Results: We analyzed 882 patient encounters over the 4-year study period. Demographic characteristics were similar in the preintervention and postintervention periods. The total interpretation rate increased to 2.7 interpretations per patient per day from a baseline rate of 1.4. Each individual interpretation modality demonstrated increases in use. Average time spent interpreting via phone increased from 8 to 10.5 minutes per patient per day, and average time spent interpreting via video went from 9.5 to 22 minutes per patient per day.
Conclusions: Iterative quality improvement methodology effectively identified barriers to equitable care, guided development of focused interventions, and improved interpreter use among pediatric patients who were critically ill.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.