Radiation of pain: psychophysical evidence for a population coding mechanism in humans.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
PAIN® Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003474
Wacław M Adamczyk, Vishwanath Ramu, Catherine Jackson, Geraldine Schulze, Kenneth R Goldschneider, Susmita Kashikar-Zuck, Christopher D King, Robert C Coghill
{"title":"Radiation of pain: psychophysical evidence for a population coding mechanism in humans.","authors":"Wacław M Adamczyk, Vishwanath Ramu, Catherine Jackson, Geraldine Schulze, Kenneth R Goldschneider, Susmita Kashikar-Zuck, Christopher D King, Robert C Coghill","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The spread of pain across body locations remains poorly understood but may provide important insights into the encoding of sensory features of noxious stimuli by populations of neurons. In this psychophysical experiment, we hypothesized that more intense noxious stimuli would lead to spread of pain, but more intense light stimuli would not produce perceptual radiation. Fifty healthy volunteers (27 females, 23 males, ages 14-44 years) participated in this study wherein noxious stimuli (43, 45, 47, and 49°C) were applied to glabrous (hand) and hairy skin (forearm) skin with 5-second and 10-second durations. Also, visual stimuli displayed on the target bodily area were used as a control. Participants provided pain (and light) spatial extent ratings as well as pain (and light) intensity ratings. In the extent rating procedure, participants adjusted the extent of the square displayed on the screen with the extent of pain (or light) that they experienced. Pain extent ratings showed statistically significant radiation of pain indicated by 12.42× greater spatial spread of pain (pain extent) than the area of the stimulation with 49°C ( P < 0.001), in contrast to visual ratings, which closely approximated the size of the stimulus (1.22×). Pain radiation was more pronounced in hairy than glabrous skin ( P < 0.05) and was more pronounced with longer stimulus duration ( P < 0.001). Pain intensity explained only 14% of the pain radiation variability. The relative independence of the pain radiation from pain intensity indicates that distinct components of population coding mechanisms may be involved in the spatial representation of pain vs intensity coding.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"1285-1295"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003474","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The spread of pain across body locations remains poorly understood but may provide important insights into the encoding of sensory features of noxious stimuli by populations of neurons. In this psychophysical experiment, we hypothesized that more intense noxious stimuli would lead to spread of pain, but more intense light stimuli would not produce perceptual radiation. Fifty healthy volunteers (27 females, 23 males, ages 14-44 years) participated in this study wherein noxious stimuli (43, 45, 47, and 49°C) were applied to glabrous (hand) and hairy skin (forearm) skin with 5-second and 10-second durations. Also, visual stimuli displayed on the target bodily area were used as a control. Participants provided pain (and light) spatial extent ratings as well as pain (and light) intensity ratings. In the extent rating procedure, participants adjusted the extent of the square displayed on the screen with the extent of pain (or light) that they experienced. Pain extent ratings showed statistically significant radiation of pain indicated by 12.42× greater spatial spread of pain (pain extent) than the area of the stimulation with 49°C ( P < 0.001), in contrast to visual ratings, which closely approximated the size of the stimulus (1.22×). Pain radiation was more pronounced in hairy than glabrous skin ( P < 0.05) and was more pronounced with longer stimulus duration ( P < 0.001). Pain intensity explained only 14% of the pain radiation variability. The relative independence of the pain radiation from pain intensity indicates that distinct components of population coding mechanisms may be involved in the spatial representation of pain vs intensity coding.

疼痛辐射:人类种群编码机制的心理物理证据。
摘要:疼痛在身体各个部位的传播仍然知之甚少,但可能为神经元群体对有害刺激的感觉特征的编码提供重要的见解。在这个心理物理实验中,我们假设更强烈的有害刺激会导致疼痛的传播,但更强烈的光刺激不会产生感知辐射。50名健康志愿者(27名女性,23名男性,年龄14-44岁)参加了这项研究,在无毛(手)和有毛(前臂)皮肤上施加有害刺激(43、45、47和49°C),持续时间分别为5秒和10秒。此外,在目标身体区域显示的视觉刺激被用作对照。参与者提供了疼痛(和光)的空间范围评分以及疼痛(和光)强度评分。在程度评定程序中,参与者根据他们所经历的疼痛(或光线)程度来调整屏幕上显示的正方形的程度。疼痛程度评分显示,与49°C刺激面积相比,疼痛的空间扩散(疼痛程度)大12.42倍(P < 0.001),与视觉评分相比,疼痛程度评分具有统计学意义,视觉评分与刺激大小相近(1.22倍)。有毛皮肤的疼痛辐射比无毛皮肤更明显(P < 0.05),刺激时间越长,疼痛辐射越明显(P < 0.001)。疼痛强度只能解释14%的疼痛辐射变异性。疼痛辐射与疼痛强度的相对独立性表明,群体编码机制的不同组成部分可能涉及疼痛与强度编码的空间表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信