Contamination of Dental Surgical Masks by Aerosols Generated During Different Dental Treatments.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Alexandra Stähli, Rui Fang Nhan, Janika Michelle Schäfer, Jean-Claude Imber, Andrea Roccuzzo, Anton Sculean, Martin Schimmel, Christian Tennert, Sigrun Eick
{"title":"Contamination of Dental Surgical Masks by Aerosols Generated During Different Dental Treatments.","authors":"Alexandra Stähli, Rui Fang Nhan, Janika Michelle Schäfer, Jean-Claude Imber, Andrea Roccuzzo, Anton Sculean, Martin Schimmel, Christian Tennert, Sigrun Eick","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.b5866891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic raised the question about the extent of microbial exposure encountered by dentists during dental therapy. The purpose of this study was to quantify microbial counts on surgical masks related to duration and type of dental therapy, as well as patient oral health variables.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sterile filter papers were fixed on surgical masks used during routine daily dental therapy. Thereafter, the filter papers were pressed onto blood agar plates for 1 min, before the agar plates were incubated with 10% CO2. After 48 h, the colony forming units (CFU) were counted and microorganisms were identified. The dependence of the CFU counts on treatment and patient-related variables was analysed using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Filter papers obtained from 322 dental treatments (429 masks) were included in the final analysis. On average, 5.41 ± 9.94 CFUs were counted. While mostly oral bacteria were detected, Staphylococcus aureus was also identified on 16 masks. Linear regression, incorporating patient-related and treatment characteristics through step-wise inclusion, revealed statistical significance (p 0.001) only with the variable 'assistance during therapy'. The type of dental treatment exhibited a trend, with fewer CFUs observed in caries treatment compared to periodontal or prosthodontic therapy. Furthermore, after analysing filter papers from masks used by dental assistants in 107 dental treatments, fewer CFUs were found on the masks compared to those used by dentists (p 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mean number of CFUs observed consistently remained low, highlighting the efficacy of the implemented hygiene measures. Consequently, it is clinically recommended to support dental treatment with precise suction of the generated aerosols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"22 ","pages":"631-638"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.b5866891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic raised the question about the extent of microbial exposure encountered by dentists during dental therapy. The purpose of this study was to quantify microbial counts on surgical masks related to duration and type of dental therapy, as well as patient oral health variables.

Materials and methods: Sterile filter papers were fixed on surgical masks used during routine daily dental therapy. Thereafter, the filter papers were pressed onto blood agar plates for 1 min, before the agar plates were incubated with 10% CO2. After 48 h, the colony forming units (CFU) were counted and microorganisms were identified. The dependence of the CFU counts on treatment and patient-related variables was analysed using linear regression.

Results: Filter papers obtained from 322 dental treatments (429 masks) were included in the final analysis. On average, 5.41 ± 9.94 CFUs were counted. While mostly oral bacteria were detected, Staphylococcus aureus was also identified on 16 masks. Linear regression, incorporating patient-related and treatment characteristics through step-wise inclusion, revealed statistical significance (p 0.001) only with the variable 'assistance during therapy'. The type of dental treatment exhibited a trend, with fewer CFUs observed in caries treatment compared to periodontal or prosthodontic therapy. Furthermore, after analysing filter papers from masks used by dental assistants in 107 dental treatments, fewer CFUs were found on the masks compared to those used by dentists (p 0.001).

Conclusion: The mean number of CFUs observed consistently remained low, highlighting the efficacy of the implemented hygiene measures. Consequently, it is clinically recommended to support dental treatment with precise suction of the generated aerosols.

不同牙科治疗过程中产生的气溶胶对牙科手术口罩的污染。
目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行提出了牙医在牙科治疗期间接触微生物程度的问题。本研究的目的是量化外科口罩上的微生物数量与牙科治疗的持续时间和类型以及患者口腔健康变量的关系。材料和方法:将无菌滤纸固定在日常牙科治疗中使用的外科口罩上。然后将滤纸压在血琼脂板上1min,琼脂板用10% CO2孵育。48h后,计数菌落形成单位(CFU)并鉴定微生物。使用线性回归分析CFU计数与治疗和患者相关变量的相关性。结果:322例牙科治疗(429例口罩)的滤纸被纳入最终分析。平均计数5.41±9.94 cfu。除口腔细菌外,16个口罩上也检出金黄色葡萄球菌。通过逐步纳入纳入患者相关特征和治疗特征的线性回归显示,只有在“治疗期间的辅助”变量下才有统计学意义(p 0.001)。牙科治疗的类型呈现出一种趋势,与牙周或修复治疗相比,龋齿治疗中观察到的cfu更少。此外,在分析了107例牙科治疗中牙科助理使用的口罩滤纸后,与牙医使用的口罩相比,在口罩上发现的cfu较少(p 0.001)。结论:观察到的cfu平均数量一直保持在较低水平,突出了实施卫生措施的有效性。因此,临床上建议通过精确吸吸产生的气溶胶来支持牙科治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信