Perimetric visual field testing reveals deficits in contrast sensitivity in workers exposed to occupational levels of pesticides.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sieu K Khuu, Martha Fabiola Rodríguez, Laila Bernal-Bechara, Gerardo A Dussan, Rebecca Y He, Ingrid Astrid Jiménez-Barbosa
{"title":"Perimetric visual field testing reveals deficits in contrast sensitivity in workers exposed to occupational levels of pesticides.","authors":"Sieu K Khuu, Martha Fabiola Rodríguez, Laila Bernal-Bechara, Gerardo A Dussan, Rebecca Y He, Ingrid Astrid Jiménez-Barbosa","doi":"10.1111/opo.13427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This case-control study investigated whether defects in visual field contrast sensitivity are associated with exposure to occupational levels of pesticides in agricultural workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven individuals exposed to occupational levels of pesticides (exposed group) from 14 agricultural systems and 27 non-exposed individuals (non-exposed group) were measured using standard automated perimetry (30-2 full threshold). Visual sector analysis, targeting regions of the optic nerve head, was performed to examine for potential region-specific sensitivity differences. Participants also underwent comprehensive assessments, including general optometric examinations and demographic surveys. Symptoms and signs of neurotoxicity were assessed using the modified Q16 neurotoxic symptom questionnaire and biological testing for abnormal levels of Substance P in tears (an inflammatory marker associated with chemical exposure) and cholinesterase (which is inhibited by pesticides) in blood samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Signs of chemical exposure were found as indicated by significantly higher levels of neurotoxic symptoms, higher concentrations of Substance P and lower levels of cholinesterase in the exposed group. Visual field global indices showed differences in contrast sensitivity between the exposed and non-exposed groups, with the exposed group demonstrating significantly lower means and larger pattern-standard deviations. Notably, visual field sector analysis revealed comparatively lower contrast sensitivity at nasal locations surrounding the optic nerve head in the exposed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found deficits in visual field contrast sensitivity to be associated with pesticide exposure, and selective loss at nasal locations centred on the optic nerve head may indicate retinal toxicity. These findings suggest the utility of visual field assessment as a potential method to evaluate pesticide-related health implications. The results highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and protective measures for agricultural workers exposed to pesticides to prevent potential visual and neurological damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This case-control study investigated whether defects in visual field contrast sensitivity are associated with exposure to occupational levels of pesticides in agricultural workers.

Methods: Twenty-seven individuals exposed to occupational levels of pesticides (exposed group) from 14 agricultural systems and 27 non-exposed individuals (non-exposed group) were measured using standard automated perimetry (30-2 full threshold). Visual sector analysis, targeting regions of the optic nerve head, was performed to examine for potential region-specific sensitivity differences. Participants also underwent comprehensive assessments, including general optometric examinations and demographic surveys. Symptoms and signs of neurotoxicity were assessed using the modified Q16 neurotoxic symptom questionnaire and biological testing for abnormal levels of Substance P in tears (an inflammatory marker associated with chemical exposure) and cholinesterase (which is inhibited by pesticides) in blood samples.

Results: Signs of chemical exposure were found as indicated by significantly higher levels of neurotoxic symptoms, higher concentrations of Substance P and lower levels of cholinesterase in the exposed group. Visual field global indices showed differences in contrast sensitivity between the exposed and non-exposed groups, with the exposed group demonstrating significantly lower means and larger pattern-standard deviations. Notably, visual field sector analysis revealed comparatively lower contrast sensitivity at nasal locations surrounding the optic nerve head in the exposed group.

Conclusion: This study found deficits in visual field contrast sensitivity to be associated with pesticide exposure, and selective loss at nasal locations centred on the optic nerve head may indicate retinal toxicity. These findings suggest the utility of visual field assessment as a potential method to evaluate pesticide-related health implications. The results highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and protective measures for agricultural workers exposed to pesticides to prevent potential visual and neurological damage.

周边视野测试显示,暴露于职业性杀虫剂水平的工人对比敏感度存在缺陷。
目的:本病例对照研究探讨了农业工人视野对比敏感度缺陷是否与职业性农药暴露水平有关。方法:采用标准自动视距仪(30-2全阈值)对来自14个农业系统的27例农药职业暴露个体(暴露组)和27例非暴露个体(非暴露组)进行测量。针对视神经头的区域进行视觉区分析,以检查潜在的区域特异性敏感性差异。参与者还接受了全面的评估,包括普通验光检查和人口调查。使用改进的Q16神经毒性症状问卷和血液样本中P物质(一种与化学暴露相关的炎症标志物)和胆碱酯酶(被杀虫剂抑制)异常水平的生物检测来评估神经毒性的症状和体征。结果:发现了化学接触的迹象,暴露组的神经毒性症状水平明显升高,P物质浓度较高,胆碱酯酶水平较低。视野整体指数显示暴露组和未暴露组的对比敏感度存在差异,暴露组的平均值明显较低,模式标准偏差较大。值得注意的是,视野扇形分析显示,暴露组视神经头周围鼻部的对比敏感度相对较低。结论:本研究发现,视野对比敏感度的缺陷与农药暴露有关,而以视神经头为中心的鼻腔位置的选择性丧失可能表明视网膜毒性。这些研究结果表明,视野评估是评估农药相关健康影响的一种潜在方法。研究结果强调,需要对接触农药的农业工人进行持续监测并采取保护措施,以防止潜在的视觉和神经损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信