The safety, accuracy, and feasibility of robotic assistance in neuro-oncological surgery.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muhammet Enes Gurses, Adham M Khalafallah, Neslihan Nisa Gecici, Elif Gökalp, Khushi Hemendra Shah, Chase Alan DeLong, Nikola Susic, Baylee Brochu, Victor M Lu, Ashish H Shah, Michael E Ivan, Ricardo J Komotar
{"title":"The safety, accuracy, and feasibility of robotic assistance in neuro-oncological surgery.","authors":"Muhammet Enes Gurses, Adham M Khalafallah, Neslihan Nisa Gecici, Elif Gökalp, Khushi Hemendra Shah, Chase Alan DeLong, Nikola Susic, Baylee Brochu, Victor M Lu, Ashish H Shah, Michael E Ivan, Ricardo J Komotar","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Over the past 3 decades, robotic technology has advanced significantly across surgical fields, driven by improvements in versatility, stability, skill, and tactile properties. Neurosurgery has led the way in integrating robotics to improve the accuracy and safety of procedures that require high precision. This study aimed to present one of the largest series in the literature and investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of robotic assistance in neuro-oncological surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy only and biopsy and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) using the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) system. The ROSA system was used for trajectory planning as well as the precise alignment and insertion of the needle and/or laser catheter. All procedures were performed by a single neurosurgeon. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, preoperative clinical deficits, diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative MR images, lesion characteristics including location and volume, postoperative complications, and deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 348 patients were identified. The mean age at surgery was 61.4 years, with 171 (49.1%) females. The most common presentations were GBM (40.5%, n = 141), metastasis (16.4%, n = 57), and radiation necrosis (9.8%, n = 34). A total of 189 (54%) patients underwent stereotactic biopsy only, and 159 (46%) underwent biopsy and LITT. The diagnostic yield of the cases was 98.6%, with only 5 cases having inconclusive pathology. Two (0.6%) patients experienced postoperative complications that resolved during follow-up. Ten (2.9%) patients developed asymptomatic subcentimeter hematomas following the procedure that did not require further intervention. No long-term consequences or permanent deficits occurred in any case within a median follow-up duration of 4.4 months (IQR 1-11.2 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that a robot-assisted approach for stereotactic biopsies and LITT is associated with a comparable diagnostic yield and safety profile for frameless and frame-based techniques. Its precision, user-friendly interface, and adaptability contribute to its suitability for such procedures. Future research, especially in long-term results and cost-effectiveness, will be crucial in fully understanding the utility and potential of this technology for broader applications in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 6","pages":"E3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Over the past 3 decades, robotic technology has advanced significantly across surgical fields, driven by improvements in versatility, stability, skill, and tactile properties. Neurosurgery has led the way in integrating robotics to improve the accuracy and safety of procedures that require high precision. This study aimed to present one of the largest series in the literature and investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of robotic assistance in neuro-oncological surgery.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy only and biopsy and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) using the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) system. The ROSA system was used for trajectory planning as well as the precise alignment and insertion of the needle and/or laser catheter. All procedures were performed by a single neurosurgeon. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, preoperative clinical deficits, diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative MR images, lesion characteristics including location and volume, postoperative complications, and deficits.

Results: A total of 348 patients were identified. The mean age at surgery was 61.4 years, with 171 (49.1%) females. The most common presentations were GBM (40.5%, n = 141), metastasis (16.4%, n = 57), and radiation necrosis (9.8%, n = 34). A total of 189 (54%) patients underwent stereotactic biopsy only, and 159 (46%) underwent biopsy and LITT. The diagnostic yield of the cases was 98.6%, with only 5 cases having inconclusive pathology. Two (0.6%) patients experienced postoperative complications that resolved during follow-up. Ten (2.9%) patients developed asymptomatic subcentimeter hematomas following the procedure that did not require further intervention. No long-term consequences or permanent deficits occurred in any case within a median follow-up duration of 4.4 months (IQR 1-11.2 months).

Conclusions: These results indicate that a robot-assisted approach for stereotactic biopsies and LITT is associated with a comparable diagnostic yield and safety profile for frameless and frame-based techniques. Its precision, user-friendly interface, and adaptability contribute to its suitability for such procedures. Future research, especially in long-term results and cost-effectiveness, will be crucial in fully understanding the utility and potential of this technology for broader applications in the field.

神经肿瘤手术中机器人辅助的安全性、准确性和可行性。
目的:在过去的30年里,机器人技术在多功能性、稳定性、技能和触觉性能的提高推动下,在外科领域取得了显著进步。神经外科在整合机器人技术方面处于领先地位,以提高需要高精度的手术的准确性和安全性。本研究旨在展示文献中最大的系列研究之一,并探讨机器人辅助神经肿瘤手术的可行性和有效性。方法:作者对仅行立体定向活检和使用机器人手术助理(ROSA)系统进行活检和激光间质热治疗(LITT)的患者的医疗记录进行了回顾性回顾。ROSA系统用于轨迹规划以及针头和/或激光导管的精确对准和插入。所有手术均由一名神经外科医生完成。电子病历回顾了患者人口统计学、术前临床缺陷、诊断、术前和术后MR图像、病变特征(包括位置和体积)、术后并发症和缺陷。结果:共发现348例患者。平均手术年龄61.4岁,女性171例(49.1%)。最常见的表现是GBM (40.5%, n = 141),转移(16.4%,n = 57)和放射性坏死(9.8%,n = 34)。共有189例(54%)患者仅行立体定向活检,159例(46%)患者行活检和LITT。本组病例的诊断率为98.6%,仅有5例病理不确定。2例(0.6%)患者出现术后并发症,在随访期间消失。10例(2.9%)患者在手术后出现无症状的亚厘米血肿,不需要进一步干预。在4.4个月(IQR 1-11.2个月)的中位随访时间内,所有病例均未发生长期后果或永久性缺陷。结论:这些结果表明,机器人辅助的立体定向活检和LITT方法与无框架和基于框架的技术的诊断率和安全性相当。它的精度、用户友好的界面和适应性使其适合于此类程序。未来的研究,特别是长期结果和成本效益方面的研究,对于充分了解这项技术在该领域更广泛应用的效用和潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信