Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Silvio Porto Junior, Davi Amorim Meira, Beatriz Lopes Bernardo da Cunha, Jefferson Heber Marques Fontes, Hugo Nunes Pustilnik, Gabriel Souza Medrado Nunes, Gabriel Araújo Cerqueira, Maria Eduarda Messias Vassoler, Philippe Quadros Monteiro, Matheus Gomes da Silva da Paz, Tancredo Alcântara, Jules Carlos Dourado, Leonardo Miranda de Avellar
{"title":"Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Silvio Porto Junior, Davi Amorim Meira, Beatriz Lopes Bernardo da Cunha, Jefferson Heber Marques Fontes, Hugo Nunes Pustilnik, Gabriel Souza Medrado Nunes, Gabriel Araújo Cerqueira, Maria Eduarda Messias Vassoler, Philippe Quadros Monteiro, Matheus Gomes da Silva da Paz, Tancredo Alcântara, Jules Carlos Dourado, Leonardo Miranda de Avellar","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03122-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intracranial lesions often require tissue diagnosis through stereotactic biopsies. Originating in the 1970s, this technique has progressed, but limitations and risks persist. Recently, robot-assisted techniques have made strides, providing the potential for safer and more precise procedures. This study assesses the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted brain biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for publications up to July 2024. Outcomes assessed included neurological deficits, hemorrhage, mortality, target point error, operative time, and length of stay. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted using standardized methods, and statistical analysis was performed using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this meta-analysis, 27 papers were included, involving 2605 patients. The gender distribution was 1448 males to 1141 females. The mean error in millimeters for the entry point error was 1.04 (95%CI: 0.72-1.37), while the target point error was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.49-1.66). The mean operative time was 52.45 min (95%CI: 37.83-67.07). Diagnostic yield had an estimated rate of 98% (95%CI: 97-98%; I²=31%). The length of hospital stay was 4.64 days (95%CI: 3.13, 6.14), from admission to discharge. The postoperative hemorrhage had an estimated risk of 6% (95%CI: 4-9%; I²=71%), while for transient neurological deficits, it was 4% (95%CI: 2-6%; I²=60%). Finally, the death related to the procedure was found to have an estimated risk of 0% (95%CI: 0-0%; I²=0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy, especially with robotic assistance, has proven to be highly effective. Robot-assisted biopsies also seems to reduce operative times and demonstrate high precision with low entry point error and target point error. Additionally, complication rates appear to be relatively low, and the average hospital stay is favorably short, underscoring the advantages of robotic assistance in stereotactic brain biopsy procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03122-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intracranial lesions often require tissue diagnosis through stereotactic biopsies. Originating in the 1970s, this technique has progressed, but limitations and risks persist. Recently, robot-assisted techniques have made strides, providing the potential for safer and more precise procedures. This study assesses the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted brain biopsies.

Methods: Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for publications up to July 2024. Outcomes assessed included neurological deficits, hemorrhage, mortality, target point error, operative time, and length of stay. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted using standardized methods, and statistical analysis was performed using R software.

Results: In this meta-analysis, 27 papers were included, involving 2605 patients. The gender distribution was 1448 males to 1141 females. The mean error in millimeters for the entry point error was 1.04 (95%CI: 0.72-1.37), while the target point error was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.49-1.66). The mean operative time was 52.45 min (95%CI: 37.83-67.07). Diagnostic yield had an estimated rate of 98% (95%CI: 97-98%; I²=31%). The length of hospital stay was 4.64 days (95%CI: 3.13, 6.14), from admission to discharge. The postoperative hemorrhage had an estimated risk of 6% (95%CI: 4-9%; I²=71%), while for transient neurological deficits, it was 4% (95%CI: 2-6%; I²=60%). Finally, the death related to the procedure was found to have an estimated risk of 0% (95%CI: 0-0%; I²=0%).

Conclusion: Our study found that the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy, especially with robotic assistance, has proven to be highly effective. Robot-assisted biopsies also seems to reduce operative times and demonstrate high precision with low entry point error and target point error. Additionally, complication rates appear to be relatively low, and the average hospital stay is favorably short, underscoring the advantages of robotic assistance in stereotactic brain biopsy procedures.

机器人辅助立体定向脑活检:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
颅内病变通常需要通过立体定向活检进行组织诊断。这项技术起源于20世纪70年代,现在已经取得了进步,但局限性和风险依然存在。最近,机器人辅助技术取得了长足的进步,为更安全、更精确的手术提供了可能。本研究评估了机器人辅助脑活检的有效性和安全性。方法:按照Cochrane和PRISMA指南,检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science截至2024年7月的出版物。评估的结果包括神经功能缺损、出血、死亡率、靶点误差、手术时间和住院时间。采用标准化方法进行数据提取和偏倚评估,采用R软件进行统计分析。结果:本荟萃分析纳入27篇论文,涉及2605例患者。性别分布为男性1448人,女性1141人。入口点误差的平均误差为1.04 (95%CI: 0.72-1.37),目标点误差为1.08 (95%CI: 0.49-1.66)。平均手术时间为52.45 min (95%CI: 37.83 ~ 67.07)。诊断率估计为98% (95%CI: 97-98%;²= 31%)。从入院到出院的住院时间为4.64天(95%CI: 3.13, 6.14)。术后出血的风险估计为6% (95%CI: 4-9%;I²=71%),而对于短暂性神经功能障碍,这一比例为4% (95%CI: 2-6%;²= 60%)。最后,发现与手术相关的死亡风险估计为0% (95%CI: 0-0%;²= 0%)。结论:我们的研究发现,立体定向脑活检的诊断率,特别是在机器人辅助下,已被证明是非常有效的。机器人辅助活检似乎也减少了手术时间,并表现出高精度,低入口点误差和目标点误差。此外,并发症发生率相对较低,平均住院时间较短,强调了机器人辅助立体定向脑活检手术的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信