Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Silvio Porto Junior, Davi Amorim Meira, Beatriz Lopes Bernardo da Cunha, Jefferson Heber Marques Fontes, Hugo Nunes Pustilnik, Gabriel Souza Medrado Nunes, Gabriel Araújo Cerqueira, Maria Eduarda Messias Vassoler, Philippe Quadros Monteiro, Matheus Gomes da Silva da Paz, Tancredo Alcântara, Jules Carlos Dourado, Leonardo Miranda de Avellar
{"title":"Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Silvio Porto Junior, Davi Amorim Meira, Beatriz Lopes Bernardo da Cunha, Jefferson Heber Marques Fontes, Hugo Nunes Pustilnik, Gabriel Souza Medrado Nunes, Gabriel Araújo Cerqueira, Maria Eduarda Messias Vassoler, Philippe Quadros Monteiro, Matheus Gomes da Silva da Paz, Tancredo Alcântara, Jules Carlos Dourado, Leonardo Miranda de Avellar","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03122-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intracranial lesions often require tissue diagnosis through stereotactic biopsies. Originating in the 1970s, this technique has progressed, but limitations and risks persist. Recently, robot-assisted techniques have made strides, providing the potential for safer and more precise procedures. This study assesses the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted brain biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for publications up to July 2024. Outcomes assessed included neurological deficits, hemorrhage, mortality, target point error, operative time, and length of stay. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted using standardized methods, and statistical analysis was performed using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this meta-analysis, 27 papers were included, involving 2605 patients. The gender distribution was 1448 males to 1141 females. The mean error in millimeters for the entry point error was 1.04 (95%CI: 0.72-1.37), while the target point error was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.49-1.66). The mean operative time was 52.45 min (95%CI: 37.83-67.07). Diagnostic yield had an estimated rate of 98% (95%CI: 97-98%; I²=31%). The length of hospital stay was 4.64 days (95%CI: 3.13, 6.14), from admission to discharge. The postoperative hemorrhage had an estimated risk of 6% (95%CI: 4-9%; I²=71%), while for transient neurological deficits, it was 4% (95%CI: 2-6%; I²=60%). Finally, the death related to the procedure was found to have an estimated risk of 0% (95%CI: 0-0%; I²=0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy, especially with robotic assistance, has proven to be highly effective. Robot-assisted biopsies also seems to reduce operative times and demonstrate high precision with low entry point error and target point error. Additionally, complication rates appear to be relatively low, and the average hospital stay is favorably short, underscoring the advantages of robotic assistance in stereotactic brain biopsy procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03122-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intracranial lesions often require tissue diagnosis through stereotactic biopsies. Originating in the 1970s, this technique has progressed, but limitations and risks persist. Recently, robot-assisted techniques have made strides, providing the potential for safer and more precise procedures. This study assesses the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted brain biopsies.

Methods: Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for publications up to July 2024. Outcomes assessed included neurological deficits, hemorrhage, mortality, target point error, operative time, and length of stay. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted using standardized methods, and statistical analysis was performed using R software.

Results: In this meta-analysis, 27 papers were included, involving 2605 patients. The gender distribution was 1448 males to 1141 females. The mean error in millimeters for the entry point error was 1.04 (95%CI: 0.72-1.37), while the target point error was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.49-1.66). The mean operative time was 52.45 min (95%CI: 37.83-67.07). Diagnostic yield had an estimated rate of 98% (95%CI: 97-98%; I²=31%). The length of hospital stay was 4.64 days (95%CI: 3.13, 6.14), from admission to discharge. The postoperative hemorrhage had an estimated risk of 6% (95%CI: 4-9%; I²=71%), while for transient neurological deficits, it was 4% (95%CI: 2-6%; I²=60%). Finally, the death related to the procedure was found to have an estimated risk of 0% (95%CI: 0-0%; I²=0%).

Conclusion: Our study found that the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy, especially with robotic assistance, has proven to be highly effective. Robot-assisted biopsies also seems to reduce operative times and demonstrate high precision with low entry point error and target point error. Additionally, complication rates appear to be relatively low, and the average hospital stay is favorably short, underscoring the advantages of robotic assistance in stereotactic brain biopsy procedures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信