Megan G Sharpe, Varun S Shah, Mina Huerta, Henry Stitzel, Ansh Desai, Collin M Labak, Kathryn Andrews, Amber Stout, Michael D Staudt
{"title":"Characterizing discharge opioid prescription in postoperative neurosurgical patients: a systematic review.","authors":"Megan G Sharpe, Varun S Shah, Mina Huerta, Henry Stitzel, Ansh Desai, Collin M Labak, Kathryn Andrews, Amber Stout, Michael D Staudt","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03131-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past two decades, the United States has experienced a rise of opioid misuse, with a significant increase in drug overdose deaths- many of these deaths have been attributed to prescription opiate misuse. Given this epidemic, numerous specialties have created enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to decrease opiate usage post-operatively and some specialties have even created guidelines advising how many morphine milligram equivalents per day are recommended at discharge. The neurosurgical literature is lacking on best practices for discharge opiate prescribing. The goal of this review is to assess opiate prescribing practices at discharge for both cranial and spine neurosurgical patients, and to determine if neurosurgeons are over-prescribing opiates to their patients. A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. After searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, a total of 288 abstracts were identified, 71 studies underwent full text review and 23 were included in this study. Studies that quantified opiate usage (number of pills prescribed, morphine equivalents, prescription refills) were included. The range of opiate prescribing varied and there was a tendency to both over-prescribe and under-prescribe; therefore, no conclusions could be made. This review underscores the need to take individual patient pain needs into account and shows the need for higher quality literature that can help formulate guideline creation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03131-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the past two decades, the United States has experienced a rise of opioid misuse, with a significant increase in drug overdose deaths- many of these deaths have been attributed to prescription opiate misuse. Given this epidemic, numerous specialties have created enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to decrease opiate usage post-operatively and some specialties have even created guidelines advising how many morphine milligram equivalents per day are recommended at discharge. The neurosurgical literature is lacking on best practices for discharge opiate prescribing. The goal of this review is to assess opiate prescribing practices at discharge for both cranial and spine neurosurgical patients, and to determine if neurosurgeons are over-prescribing opiates to their patients. A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. After searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, a total of 288 abstracts were identified, 71 studies underwent full text review and 23 were included in this study. Studies that quantified opiate usage (number of pills prescribed, morphine equivalents, prescription refills) were included. The range of opiate prescribing varied and there was a tendency to both over-prescribe and under-prescribe; therefore, no conclusions could be made. This review underscores the need to take individual patient pain needs into account and shows the need for higher quality literature that can help formulate guideline creation.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.