Alpha oscillations protect auditory working memory against distractors in the encoding phase.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2025-01-29 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109058
Chia-An Tu, Tiina Parviainen, Jarmo A Hämäläinen, Yi-Fang Hsu
{"title":"Alpha oscillations protect auditory working memory against distractors in the encoding phase.","authors":"Chia-An Tu, Tiina Parviainen, Jarmo A Hämäläinen, Yi-Fang Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alpha oscillations are proposed to serve the function of inhibition to protect items in working memory from intruding information. In a modified Sternberg paradigm, alpha power was initially found to increase at the anticipation of strong compared to weak distractors, reflecting the active gating of distracting information from interfering with the memory trace. However, there was a lack of evidence supporting the inhibition account of alpha oscillations in later studies using similar experimental design with greater temporal disparity between the encoding phase and the presentation of the distractors. This temporal disparity might have dampened the demands for inhibition. To test the hypothesis that alpha inhibition takes place when distractors are temporally close to the encoding phase, here we designed a modified Sternberg paradigm where distractors were sandwiched between targets in the encoding phase to ensure that they compete for working memory resources. Using electroencephalography (EEG), we replicated the finding that alpha power increased for strong compared to weak distractors. The effect was present throughout the encoding phase, not only upon the presentation of distractors but also before and after the presentation of distractors, providing evidence for both proactive and reactive inhibition of distractors at the neuronal level. Meanwhile, the effect was restricted to the context of high but not low target-to-distractor ratio. The results suggest that the distractors being temporally close to the encoding phase of more targets might be a boundary condition of the generation of alpha oscillations for gating.</p>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":" ","pages":"109058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alpha oscillations are proposed to serve the function of inhibition to protect items in working memory from intruding information. In a modified Sternberg paradigm, alpha power was initially found to increase at the anticipation of strong compared to weak distractors, reflecting the active gating of distracting information from interfering with the memory trace. However, there was a lack of evidence supporting the inhibition account of alpha oscillations in later studies using similar experimental design with greater temporal disparity between the encoding phase and the presentation of the distractors. This temporal disparity might have dampened the demands for inhibition. To test the hypothesis that alpha inhibition takes place when distractors are temporally close to the encoding phase, here we designed a modified Sternberg paradigm where distractors were sandwiched between targets in the encoding phase to ensure that they compete for working memory resources. Using electroencephalography (EEG), we replicated the finding that alpha power increased for strong compared to weak distractors. The effect was present throughout the encoding phase, not only upon the presentation of distractors but also before and after the presentation of distractors, providing evidence for both proactive and reactive inhibition of distractors at the neuronal level. Meanwhile, the effect was restricted to the context of high but not low target-to-distractor ratio. The results suggest that the distractors being temporally close to the encoding phase of more targets might be a boundary condition of the generation of alpha oscillations for gating.

α振荡在编码阶段保护听觉工作记忆免受干扰。
α振荡被认为具有抑制功能,以保护工作记忆中的项目不受信息入侵。在一个改进的斯滕伯格范式中,最初发现在预期强干扰物时,阿尔法能量比预期弱干扰物时增加,这反映了干扰信息干扰记忆轨迹的主动门控。然而,在后来的研究中,使用类似的实验设计,在编码阶段和干扰物呈现之间存在更大的时间差异,缺乏支持α振荡抑制的证据。这种时间上的差异可能抑制了对抑制的需求。为了验证当干扰物暂时接近编码阶段时α抑制发生的假设,我们设计了一个改进的Sternberg范式,将干扰物夹在编码阶段的目标之间,以确保它们竞争工作记忆资源。使用脑电图(EEG),我们重复了强干扰物比弱干扰物的α功率增加的发现。这种效应存在于整个编码阶段,不仅存在于干扰物出现时,也存在于干扰物出现前后,这为神经元水平上干扰物的主动抑制和反应性抑制提供了证据。同时,这种效应只存在于目标与分心物比高而不低的情境中。结果表明,干扰物在时间上接近更多目标的编码相位可能是门控产生α振荡的边界条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信