Efficacy of adjunctive systemic or local antibiotic therapy in peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

IF 4.7 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Yifan Lu, Siqi Bao, Hongke Luo, Qianming Chen, Misi Si
{"title":"Efficacy of adjunctive systemic or local antibiotic therapy in peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.","authors":"Yifan Lu, Siqi Bao, Hongke Luo, Qianming Chen, Misi Si","doi":"10.1631/jzus.B2300730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis considered the results of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of systemic or local antibiotic therapy in peri-implantitis. Two independent authors screened publications from three electronic databases to include RCTs meeting all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the weighted mean differences in survival rate (SR) and changes in pocket probing depth (PPD), bone level (BL), and clinical attachment level (CAL). The study cohorts were defined as antibiotic and control groups with subgroups for analysis. Seven studies including 309 patients (390 implants) were considered. Within the limitations of this review, patients in the antibiotic groups exhibited significant improvements in PPD. Subgroup analysis indicated that the administration of systemic antibiotics or the use of antibiotics in non-surgical treatments did not result in a significant alteration in BL. It was established that the addition of antibiotics can ameliorate PPD and SR in the treatment of peri-implantitis, whether through surgical or non-surgical approaches, and also shows moderate performance regarding BL and CAL. Considering the lack of application of new technologies in the control group and the hardship of assessing the potential risks of antibiotics, careful clinical judgment is still necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":17797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2300730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis considered the results of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of systemic or local antibiotic therapy in peri-implantitis. Two independent authors screened publications from three electronic databases to include RCTs meeting all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the weighted mean differences in survival rate (SR) and changes in pocket probing depth (PPD), bone level (BL), and clinical attachment level (CAL). The study cohorts were defined as antibiotic and control groups with subgroups for analysis. Seven studies including 309 patients (390 implants) were considered. Within the limitations of this review, patients in the antibiotic groups exhibited significant improvements in PPD. Subgroup analysis indicated that the administration of systemic antibiotics or the use of antibiotics in non-surgical treatments did not result in a significant alteration in BL. It was established that the addition of antibiotics can ameliorate PPD and SR in the treatment of peri-implantitis, whether through surgical or non-surgical approaches, and also shows moderate performance regarding BL and CAL. Considering the lack of application of new technologies in the control group and the hardship of assessing the potential risks of antibiotics, careful clinical judgment is still necessary.

辅助全身或局部抗生素治疗种植体周围炎的疗效:随机对照临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析考虑了随机对照临床试验(RCTs)的结果,以评估全身或局部抗生素治疗种植体周围炎的疗效。两位独立作者从三个电子数据库中筛选出版物,纳入符合所有纳入和排除标准的随机对照试验。采用meta分析来评估生存率(SR)和口袋探测深度(PPD)、骨水平(BL)和临床附着水平(CAL)的加权平均差异。研究队列被定义为抗生素组和对照组,并进行亚组分析。纳入了7项研究,包括309例患者(390个植入物)。在本综述的局限性内,抗生素组的患者在PPD方面表现出显著的改善。亚组分析表明,全身性应用抗生素或在非手术治疗中使用抗生素均不会导致BL的显著改变。由此可见,无论是通过手术还是非手术方式,在种植体周围炎的治疗中,添加抗生素都可以改善PPD和SR。在BL和CAL方面也表现一般。考虑到对照组新技术应用较少,抗生素潜在风险评估难度较大,临床仍需谨慎判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
2125
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Zheijang University SCIENCE B - Biomedicine & Biotechnology is an international journal that aims to present the latest development and achievements in scientific research in China and abroad to the world’s scientific community. JZUS-B covers research in Biomedicine and Biotechnology and Biochemistry and topics related to life science subjects, such as Plant and Animal Sciences, Environment and Resource etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信