Evaluation of RT-QuIC Diagnostic Performance for Chronic Wasting Disease Detection Using Elk (Cervus canadensis) Ear Punches.

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Damani N Bryant, Roxanne J Larsen, Kristin J Bondo, Andrew S Norton, Andrew J Lindbloom, Steven L Griffin, Peter A Larsen, Tiffany M Wolf, Stuart S Lichtenberg
{"title":"Evaluation of RT-QuIC Diagnostic Performance for Chronic Wasting Disease Detection Using Elk (Cervus canadensis) Ear Punches.","authors":"Damani N Bryant, Roxanne J Larsen, Kristin J Bondo, Andrew S Norton, Andrew J Lindbloom, Steven L Griffin, Peter A Larsen, Tiffany M Wolf, Stuart S Lichtenberg","doi":"10.7589/JWD-D-24-00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensitive and specific antemortem diagnostic tests are a prerequisite for effective management of chronic wasting disease (CWD). Paired with readily accessible samples that accurately reflect CWD status, the real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assay has the potential to enable more effective CWD surveillance and interventions. We evaluated the feasibility of RT-QuIC as a CWD diagnostic test using 6-mm ear tissue biopsies from elk (Cervus canadensis). First, we evaluated the effect of ear spatial location on seeding activity. We observed an effect of ear punch spatial location on the amyloid formation rate (AFR): Samples collected from the periphery of the ear evidenced a statistically significant increase in AFR relative to ear punches from the ventral midline. Gross microdissection of an ear pinna suggested that there was more small nerve innervation around the periphery of the ear. Second, we evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of RT-QuIC using ear punches from elk that had been previously diagnosed via ELISA testing. We evaluated the impact of nonstatistical and statistical approaches on diagnostic accuracy. Specificity and positive predictive value were perfect when statistical analyses were used to evaluate the binomial distribution (CWD positive versus CWD negative) of the data. Conversely, sensitivity and negative predictive value were modest, independent of the application of statistical analysis, indicating that RT-QuIC may be susceptible to false-negative data in this context. Taken together, our data support the idea that RT-QuIC, when paired with US Department of Agriculture-approved diagnostic tests, may provide more time to stakeholders for making major management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7589/JWD-D-24-00071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensitive and specific antemortem diagnostic tests are a prerequisite for effective management of chronic wasting disease (CWD). Paired with readily accessible samples that accurately reflect CWD status, the real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assay has the potential to enable more effective CWD surveillance and interventions. We evaluated the feasibility of RT-QuIC as a CWD diagnostic test using 6-mm ear tissue biopsies from elk (Cervus canadensis). First, we evaluated the effect of ear spatial location on seeding activity. We observed an effect of ear punch spatial location on the amyloid formation rate (AFR): Samples collected from the periphery of the ear evidenced a statistically significant increase in AFR relative to ear punches from the ventral midline. Gross microdissection of an ear pinna suggested that there was more small nerve innervation around the periphery of the ear. Second, we evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of RT-QuIC using ear punches from elk that had been previously diagnosed via ELISA testing. We evaluated the impact of nonstatistical and statistical approaches on diagnostic accuracy. Specificity and positive predictive value were perfect when statistical analyses were used to evaluate the binomial distribution (CWD positive versus CWD negative) of the data. Conversely, sensitivity and negative predictive value were modest, independent of the application of statistical analysis, indicating that RT-QuIC may be susceptible to false-negative data in this context. Taken together, our data support the idea that RT-QuIC, when paired with US Department of Agriculture-approved diagnostic tests, may provide more time to stakeholders for making major management decisions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Diseases
Journal of Wildlife Diseases 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The JWD publishes reports of wildlife disease investigations, research papers, brief research notes, case and epizootic reports, review articles, and book reviews. The JWD publishes the results of original research and observations dealing with all aspects of infectious, parasitic, toxic, nutritional, physiologic, developmental and neoplastic diseases, environmental contamination, and other factors impinging on the health and survival of free-living or occasionally captive populations of wild animals, including fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Papers on zoonoses involving wildlife and on chemical immobilization of wild animals are also published. Manuscripts dealing with surveys and case reports may be published in the Journal provided that they contain significant new information or have significance for better understanding health and disease in wild populations. Authors are encouraged to address the wildlife management implications of their studies, where appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信