Age-related differences in postural stability and asymmetries among female rhythmic gymnasts: implications for injury prevention and performance enhancement.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Aleksandra Z Aleksić Veljković, Andrea S Marković, Mila D Vukadinović Jurišić, Jelena M Obradović, Borko D Katanić
{"title":"Age-related differences in postural stability and asymmetries among female rhythmic gymnasts: implications for injury prevention and performance enhancement.","authors":"Aleksandra Z Aleksić Veljković, Andrea S Marković, Mila D Vukadinović Jurišić, Jelena M Obradović, Borko D Katanić","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16136-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine age group differences in the postural stability of female rhythmic gymnasts, as well as the asymmetries in postural control between them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 126 female rhythmic gymnasts (aged 6-12 years) were tested. The rhythmic gymnasts were grouped based on their age between 6-8 years (N.=45; young pioneers), 9-10 years (N.=36; pioneers), and 11-12 years (N.=45; cadets). Postural stability and asymmetry were evaluated by the Y-Balance Test (YBT) with both legs (right and left) in three directions: anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral and Balance Error Scoring System (BESS). Postural stability was analyzed between age categories using the Kruskal-Wallis Test and Dunn's post-hoc test, and the differences in asymmetry were determined by univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The young pioneers (age 6-8 years) had a greater number of errors in the single-leg foam stance and tandem foam stance than the 9-10-year-old and 11-12-year-old rhythmic gymnasts (P≤0.005). They also had a greater number of errors in BESS Total scores compared to other age categories (young pioneers 18.42±5.63; pioneers 15.08±4.78 and cadets 13.89±5.61; P≤0.005). Results showed significant differences (P≤0.005) between the young pioneers (age 6-8 years) and the cadets (age 11-12 years) in normalized left and right posteromedial reach direction. No significant differences (P≥0.005) in reach asymmetry were observed among age categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, 6-8-year-old rhythmic gymnasts (young pioneers) should have continuum screening during training and completion development.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":"546-553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16136-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine age group differences in the postural stability of female rhythmic gymnasts, as well as the asymmetries in postural control between them.

Methods: A total of 126 female rhythmic gymnasts (aged 6-12 years) were tested. The rhythmic gymnasts were grouped based on their age between 6-8 years (N.=45; young pioneers), 9-10 years (N.=36; pioneers), and 11-12 years (N.=45; cadets). Postural stability and asymmetry were evaluated by the Y-Balance Test (YBT) with both legs (right and left) in three directions: anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral and Balance Error Scoring System (BESS). Postural stability was analyzed between age categories using the Kruskal-Wallis Test and Dunn's post-hoc test, and the differences in asymmetry were determined by univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: The young pioneers (age 6-8 years) had a greater number of errors in the single-leg foam stance and tandem foam stance than the 9-10-year-old and 11-12-year-old rhythmic gymnasts (P≤0.005). They also had a greater number of errors in BESS Total scores compared to other age categories (young pioneers 18.42±5.63; pioneers 15.08±4.78 and cadets 13.89±5.61; P≤0.005). Results showed significant differences (P≤0.005) between the young pioneers (age 6-8 years) and the cadets (age 11-12 years) in normalized left and right posteromedial reach direction. No significant differences (P≥0.005) in reach asymmetry were observed among age categories.

Conclusions: In conclusion, 6-8-year-old rhythmic gymnasts (young pioneers) should have continuum screening during training and completion development.

女性艺术体操运动员姿势稳定性和不对称性的年龄相关差异:对损伤预防和成绩提高的影响。
背景:本研究的目的是确定女性艺术体操运动员姿势稳定性的年龄组差异,以及她们之间姿势控制的不对称性。方法:对126名6 ~ 12岁女子艺术体操运动员进行测试。艺术体操运动员按年龄6-8岁分组(n =45;少先队员),9-10年(n =36;拓荒者),11-12年(n =45;学员)。通过左、右两腿前、后内侧和后外侧三个方向的y -平衡试验(YBT)和平衡误差评分系统(BESS)评估姿势稳定性和不对称性。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn’s事后检验对不同年龄类别的体位稳定性进行分析,通过单因素方差分析(ANOVA)确定不对称性的差异。结果:少先队员(6 ~ 8岁)在单腿泡沫站立和双人泡沫站立的错误次数高于9 ~ 10岁和11 ~ 12岁的艺术体操运动员(P≤0.005)。他们在BESS总分上的错误率也高于其他年龄组(少先队员18.42±5.63;先锋队15.08±4.78,学员13.89±5.61;P≤0.005)。结果:少先队员(6 ~ 8岁)与学员(11 ~ 12岁)在标准化左、右后内侧到达方向上差异有统计学意义(P≤0.005);不同年龄组之间的肢体不对称无显著性差异(P≥0.005)。结论:6-8岁艺术体操运动员(少先队员)应在训练和完成发育过程中进行连续筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信