Long-term health effects of antipyretic drug use in the aging population: a systematic review.

Q3 Medicine
Seema Mahesh, Esther van der Werf, Mahesh Mallappa, George Vithoulkas, Nai Ming Lai
{"title":"Long-term health effects of antipyretic drug use in the aging population: a systematic review.","authors":"Seema Mahesh, Esther van der Werf, Mahesh Mallappa, George Vithoulkas, Nai Ming Lai","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is unclear whether fever suppression in the elderly provides long-term benefits or poses risks due to their distinct immune profiles and body temperature regulation compared to younger individuals. This study aimed to assess the long-term health effects of antipyretic treatment during infections in the elderly. A systematic review was conducted, including studies that compared antipyretic treatment with other drugs, therapies, placebo, or no treatment. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. Primary and secondary outcomes were the onset or worsening of chronic inflammatory diseases, fever reduction, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, mortality, laboratory indicators of morbidity, and progression to complications, respectively. Out of 11,481 studies screened, 17 were included (two randomized controlled trials [RCTs], seven observational studies, one case series, and seven case reports). None investigated the primary outcome or patient-reported outcomes. The risk of bias in the included studies ranged from unclear to high. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis was conducted, as meta-analysis was not feasible. Antipyretics showed a significant reduction of fever in RCTs. Five studies reported a significant drop in blood pressure, and one showed significant mortality from antipyretics. Morbidity indicators and length of stay were available only in the studies that reported adverse events. The certainty of evidence, assessed using GRADE, was low to very low for all outcomes. Evidence regarding the long-term benefit or harm from fever suppression with antipyretics during infections in the elderly is insufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 9","pages":"830-839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is unclear whether fever suppression in the elderly provides long-term benefits or poses risks due to their distinct immune profiles and body temperature regulation compared to younger individuals. This study aimed to assess the long-term health effects of antipyretic treatment during infections in the elderly. A systematic review was conducted, including studies that compared antipyretic treatment with other drugs, therapies, placebo, or no treatment. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. Primary and secondary outcomes were the onset or worsening of chronic inflammatory diseases, fever reduction, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, mortality, laboratory indicators of morbidity, and progression to complications, respectively. Out of 11,481 studies screened, 17 were included (two randomized controlled trials [RCTs], seven observational studies, one case series, and seven case reports). None investigated the primary outcome or patient-reported outcomes. The risk of bias in the included studies ranged from unclear to high. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis was conducted, as meta-analysis was not feasible. Antipyretics showed a significant reduction of fever in RCTs. Five studies reported a significant drop in blood pressure, and one showed significant mortality from antipyretics. Morbidity indicators and length of stay were available only in the studies that reported adverse events. The certainty of evidence, assessed using GRADE, was low to very low for all outcomes. Evidence regarding the long-term benefit or harm from fever suppression with antipyretics during infections in the elderly is insufficient.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信