Tranexamic Acid With Acid Suppression Versus Acid Suppression Alone as Therapy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sheau-Wen Kan, Yen Pin Tan, Ming Zhe Tay, Mei-Ju Chi
{"title":"Tranexamic Acid With Acid Suppression Versus Acid Suppression Alone as Therapy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Sheau-Wen Kan, Yen Pin Tan, Ming Zhe Tay, Mei-Ju Chi","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have reported the benefits of tranexamic acid (TXA) in controlling bleeding across various conditions. However, the effect of TXA in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains controversial, and its therapeutic impact when combined with acid suppression, particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which are considered first-line therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers, has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from January 1987 to June 2024 using predefined keywords to identify RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria, including details of TXA dosage, route of administration, and choice of acid suppressants. Data from selected trials were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six trials with 709 participants were included. Baseline patient characteristics in the selected trials were balanced. The rebleeding rate, mortality, need for blood transfusion, units of blood transfused, and need for salvage therapy were compared. The TXA with acid suppression group significantly reduced the risk of rebleeding (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96), units of blood transfused (mean difference: -1.08, 95% CI: -1.44 to -0.71), and the need for salvage therapy (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12-0.64). No significant difference was observed in mortality rate (RR: 0.74) and need for blood transfusion (RR: 1.01) between the two groups, but outcomes favored the TXA and acid suppression group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest combining TXA with acid suppression as a first-line therapy for UGIB patients. Further trials should be conducted to determine the optimal dose and route of TXA administration for better care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have reported the benefits of tranexamic acid (TXA) in controlling bleeding across various conditions. However, the effect of TXA in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains controversial, and its therapeutic impact when combined with acid suppression, particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which are considered first-line therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers, has not been reported.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from January 1987 to June 2024 using predefined keywords to identify RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria, including details of TXA dosage, route of administration, and choice of acid suppressants. Data from selected trials were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modeling.

Results: Six trials with 709 participants were included. Baseline patient characteristics in the selected trials were balanced. The rebleeding rate, mortality, need for blood transfusion, units of blood transfused, and need for salvage therapy were compared. The TXA with acid suppression group significantly reduced the risk of rebleeding (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96), units of blood transfused (mean difference: -1.08, 95% CI: -1.44 to -0.71), and the need for salvage therapy (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12-0.64). No significant difference was observed in mortality rate (RR: 0.74) and need for blood transfusion (RR: 1.01) between the two groups, but outcomes favored the TXA and acid suppression group.

Conclusions: We suggest combining TXA with acid suppression as a first-line therapy for UGIB patients. Further trials should be conducted to determine the optimal dose and route of TXA administration for better care.

氨甲环酸联合抑酸与单独抑酸治疗上消化道出血:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
背景:研究报道了氨甲环酸(TXA)在控制各种情况下出血的益处。然而,TXA在上消化道出血(UGIB)中的作用仍然存在争议,其与酸抑制,特别是质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)联合的治疗效果,被认为是出血性消化性溃疡的一线治疗,尚未报道。方法:从1987年1月至2024年6月,我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和谷歌Scholar,使用预定义的关键词来识别符合我们纳入标准的随机对照试验,包括TXA剂量、给药途径和酸抑制剂的选择。从选定的试验中提取数据,并使用随机效应建模进行荟萃分析。结果:纳入6项试验,709名受试者。所选试验的基线患者特征是平衡的。比较两组患者的再出血率、死亡率、输血需要量、输血单位数和抢救治疗需要量。TXA联合抑酸组显著降低了再出血风险(RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96)、输血单位(平均差异:-1.08,95% CI: -1.44至-0.71)和补救性治疗需求(RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12-0.64)。两组之间的死亡率(RR: 0.74)和输血需求(RR: 1.01)无显著差异,但结果偏向于TXA和酸抑制组。结论:我们建议将TXA联合抑酸作为UGIB患者的一线治疗。进一步的试验应该进行,以确定最佳剂量和给药途径TXA更好的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信