Efficacy and Safety of Dose Increase From 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d of Lurasidone in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Post Hoc Analysis of Extension Trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001943
Hiroyoshi Takeuchi, Hiroyuki Uchida
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Dose Increase From 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d of Lurasidone in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Post Hoc Analysis of Extension Trial.","authors":"Hiroyoshi Takeuchi, Hiroyuki Uchida","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000001943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of increasing the dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d in patients with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis focused on patients who completed a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lurasidone and transitioned to a subsequent 12-week open-label extension trial. Patients initially assigned to lurasidone (40 mg/d) or placebo during the double-blind trial (DBT-LUR group or DBT-PLA group, respectively) received lurasidone (40 mg/d) during the extension. Clinicians could increase the dose to 80 mg/d based on clinical judgment. The efficacy outcomes included the change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from the start to the end of the lurasidone (80 mg/d) treatment period. Safety outcome was the rate of newly emergent adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 287 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 153 received an increased dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d. Significant reductions in the PANSS total scores were observed in both groups (all P values, ≤0.001). Additionally, 35.9% of the DBT-LUR group and 40.0% of the DBT-PLA group achieved a ≥20% reduction in the PANSS total score. New adverse events emerged in 47.4% of the DBT-LUR group and 48.0% of the DBT-PLA group during the lurasidone (80 mg/d) treatment period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing the dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d may be effective and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia. Because of the lack of a control group and blinding, the results should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"16-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of increasing the dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d in patients with schizophrenia.

Methods: This post hoc analysis focused on patients who completed a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lurasidone and transitioned to a subsequent 12-week open-label extension trial. Patients initially assigned to lurasidone (40 mg/d) or placebo during the double-blind trial (DBT-LUR group or DBT-PLA group, respectively) received lurasidone (40 mg/d) during the extension. Clinicians could increase the dose to 80 mg/d based on clinical judgment. The efficacy outcomes included the change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from the start to the end of the lurasidone (80 mg/d) treatment period. Safety outcome was the rate of newly emergent adverse events.

Results: Of 287 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 153 received an increased dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d. Significant reductions in the PANSS total scores were observed in both groups (all P values, ≤0.001). Additionally, 35.9% of the DBT-LUR group and 40.0% of the DBT-PLA group achieved a ≥20% reduction in the PANSS total score. New adverse events emerged in 47.4% of the DBT-LUR group and 48.0% of the DBT-PLA group during the lurasidone (80 mg/d) treatment period.

Conclusions: Increasing the dose of lurasidone from 40 mg/d to 80 mg/d may be effective and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia. Because of the lack of a control group and blinding, the results should be interpreted with caution.

精神分裂症患者鲁拉西酮剂量从40mg /d增加到80mg /d的有效性和安全性:一项扩展试验的事后分析
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估精神分裂症患者鲁拉西酮剂量从40mg /d增加到80mg /d的有效性和安全性。方法:这项事后分析的重点是完成了为期6周的鲁拉西酮双盲、安慰剂对照试验并转入随后的12周开放标签扩展试验的患者。在双盲试验期间(分别为DBT-LUR组或DBT-PLA组)最初分配给卢拉西酮(40 mg/d)或安慰剂的患者在延长期间接受卢拉西酮(40 mg/d)。临床医生可根据临床判断将剂量增加至80 mg/d。疗效指标包括鲁拉西酮(80 mg/d)治疗开始至结束时阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)总分的变化。安全性指标为新出现不良事件的发生率。结果:在意向治疗人群中的287例患者中,153例接受了鲁拉西酮剂量从40mg /d增加到80mg /d的治疗。两组患者PANSS总分均显著降低(P值均≤0.001)。此外,35.9%的DBT-LUR组和40.0%的DBT-PLA组的PANSS总分降低≥20%。在鲁拉西酮(80 mg/d)治疗期间,DBT-LUR组和DBT-PLA组的新不良事件发生率分别为47.4%和48.0%。结论:将卢拉西酮的剂量从40mg /d增加到80mg /d可能对精神分裂症患者有效且耐受性良好。由于缺乏对照组和盲法,结果应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信