Development and Validation of Algorithms to Identify Individuals With Cutaneous Lupus From Healthcare Databases.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1177/12034754241301405
Lisa N Guo, Jordan T Said, Michael J Woodbury, Vinod E Nambudiri, Joseph F Merola
{"title":"Development and Validation of Algorithms to Identify Individuals With Cutaneous Lupus From Healthcare Databases.","authors":"Lisa N Guo, Jordan T Said, Michael J Woodbury, Vinod E Nambudiri, Joseph F Merola","doi":"10.1177/12034754241301405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no validated methods to identify individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) from large databases including claims data and electronic health records, severely limiting the study of the epidemiology of this disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate accurate algorithms to identify individuals with CLE from healthcare records.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve case-finding algorithms were developed based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes, provider specialty, and medication prescription data. To validate performance, algorithms were applied to a test cohort of 300 individuals drawn from a clinical data repository of a multi-institutional healthcare network in Boston, MA. Documentation of a CLE diagnosis by a dermatologist or rheumatologist determined from chart review or supportive biopsy findings was used as the case definition standard. Performance was evaluated based on calculated positive predictive values (PPVs), specificities, and sensitivities of each algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPVs ranged from 58.0% to 92.9%. The use of a single diagnosis code for CLE from any provider had poor PPV. The algorithm with the highest PPV (89.0%) while maintaining sensitivity required at least 1 ICD-10 CLE diagnosis code recorded by a dermatologist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilizing CLE diagnosis codes and dermatology as the coding provider specialty is a valid method for identifying CLE patients from electronic health records.</p>","PeriodicalId":15403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754241301405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no validated methods to identify individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) from large databases including claims data and electronic health records, severely limiting the study of the epidemiology of this disease.

Objectives: To develop and validate accurate algorithms to identify individuals with CLE from healthcare records.

Methods: Twelve case-finding algorithms were developed based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes, provider specialty, and medication prescription data. To validate performance, algorithms were applied to a test cohort of 300 individuals drawn from a clinical data repository of a multi-institutional healthcare network in Boston, MA. Documentation of a CLE diagnosis by a dermatologist or rheumatologist determined from chart review or supportive biopsy findings was used as the case definition standard. Performance was evaluated based on calculated positive predictive values (PPVs), specificities, and sensitivities of each algorithm.

Results: PPVs ranged from 58.0% to 92.9%. The use of a single diagnosis code for CLE from any provider had poor PPV. The algorithm with the highest PPV (89.0%) while maintaining sensitivity required at least 1 ICD-10 CLE diagnosis code recorded by a dermatologist.

Conclusions: Utilizing CLE diagnosis codes and dermatology as the coding provider specialty is a valid method for identifying CLE patients from electronic health records.

从医疗保健数据库中识别皮肤红斑狼疮患者的算法的开发和验证。
背景:目前还没有有效的方法从包括索赔数据和电子健康记录在内的大型数据库中识别皮肤红斑狼疮(CLE)患者,严重限制了该疾病的流行病学研究。目的:开发和验证从医疗记录中识别CLE患者的准确算法。方法:基于国际疾病分类(ICD)-10诊断代码、提供者专业和药物处方数据开发了12种病例查找算法。为了验证性能,将算法应用于从马萨诸塞州波士顿一家多机构医疗保健网络的临床数据存储库中抽取的300人的测试队列。由皮肤科医生或风湿病学家根据图表回顾或支持性活检结果确定的CLE诊断文件被用作病例定义标准。根据计算的阳性预测值(ppv)、特异性和每种算法的敏感性来评估性能。结果:ppv范围为58.0% ~ 92.9%。使用来自任何提供者的单一CLE诊断代码的PPV较差。在保持灵敏度的同时PPV最高(89.0%)的算法需要至少1个皮肤科医生记录的ICD-10 CLE诊断代码。结论:利用CLE诊断代码和皮肤科作为编码提供者专业是识别电子病历中CLE患者的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (JCMS) aims to reflect the state of the art in cutaneous biology and dermatology by providing original scientific writings, as well as a complete critical review of the dermatology literature for clinicians, trainees, and academicians. JCMS endeavours to bring readers cutting edge dermatologic information in two distinct formats. Part of each issue features scholarly research and articles on issues of basic and applied science, insightful case reports, comprehensive continuing medical education, and in depth reviews, all of which provide theoretical framework for practitioners to make sound practical decisions. The evolving field of dermatology is highlighted through these articles. In addition, part of each issue is dedicated to making the most important developments in dermatology easily accessible to the clinician by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information in a format that is interesting, clearly presented, and useful to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信