Lisa N Guo, Jordan T Said, Michael J Woodbury, Vinod E Nambudiri, Joseph F Merola
{"title":"Development and Validation of Algorithms to Identify Individuals With Cutaneous Lupus From Healthcare Databases.","authors":"Lisa N Guo, Jordan T Said, Michael J Woodbury, Vinod E Nambudiri, Joseph F Merola","doi":"10.1177/12034754241301405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no validated methods to identify individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) from large databases including claims data and electronic health records, severely limiting the study of the epidemiology of this disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate accurate algorithms to identify individuals with CLE from healthcare records.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve case-finding algorithms were developed based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes, provider specialty, and medication prescription data. To validate performance, algorithms were applied to a test cohort of 300 individuals drawn from a clinical data repository of a multi-institutional healthcare network in Boston, MA. Documentation of a CLE diagnosis by a dermatologist or rheumatologist determined from chart review or supportive biopsy findings was used as the case definition standard. Performance was evaluated based on calculated positive predictive values (PPVs), specificities, and sensitivities of each algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPVs ranged from 58.0% to 92.9%. The use of a single diagnosis code for CLE from any provider had poor PPV. The algorithm with the highest PPV (89.0%) while maintaining sensitivity required at least 1 ICD-10 CLE diagnosis code recorded by a dermatologist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilizing CLE diagnosis codes and dermatology as the coding provider specialty is a valid method for identifying CLE patients from electronic health records.</p>","PeriodicalId":15403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754241301405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There are no validated methods to identify individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) from large databases including claims data and electronic health records, severely limiting the study of the epidemiology of this disease.
Objectives: To develop and validate accurate algorithms to identify individuals with CLE from healthcare records.
Methods: Twelve case-finding algorithms were developed based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes, provider specialty, and medication prescription data. To validate performance, algorithms were applied to a test cohort of 300 individuals drawn from a clinical data repository of a multi-institutional healthcare network in Boston, MA. Documentation of a CLE diagnosis by a dermatologist or rheumatologist determined from chart review or supportive biopsy findings was used as the case definition standard. Performance was evaluated based on calculated positive predictive values (PPVs), specificities, and sensitivities of each algorithm.
Results: PPVs ranged from 58.0% to 92.9%. The use of a single diagnosis code for CLE from any provider had poor PPV. The algorithm with the highest PPV (89.0%) while maintaining sensitivity required at least 1 ICD-10 CLE diagnosis code recorded by a dermatologist.
Conclusions: Utilizing CLE diagnosis codes and dermatology as the coding provider specialty is a valid method for identifying CLE patients from electronic health records.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (JCMS) aims to reflect the state of the art in cutaneous biology and dermatology by providing original scientific writings, as well as a complete critical review of the dermatology literature for clinicians, trainees, and academicians. JCMS endeavours to bring readers cutting edge dermatologic information in two distinct formats. Part of each issue features scholarly research and articles on issues of basic and applied science, insightful case reports, comprehensive continuing medical education, and in depth reviews, all of which provide theoretical framework for practitioners to make sound practical decisions. The evolving field of dermatology is highlighted through these articles. In addition, part of each issue is dedicated to making the most important developments in dermatology easily accessible to the clinician by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information in a format that is interesting, clearly presented, and useful to patient care.