Budesonide/formoterol turbuhaler vs pMDI salbutamol for acute asthma in outpatient emergency department: a prospective, randomized, open-label study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2024.2438094
Hock Peng Koh, Sin Nan Lai, Woon Wee Chong, Zulsairi Mohd Pauzi
{"title":"Budesonide/formoterol turbuhaler vs pMDI salbutamol for acute asthma in outpatient emergency department: a prospective, randomized, open-label study.","authors":"Hock Peng Koh, Sin Nan Lai, Woon Wee Chong, Zulsairi Mohd Pauzi","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2024.2438094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) has suggested the need for more studies on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol in the Emergency Department (ED).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare the outcomes of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 mcg/inhalation) turbuhaler versus pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) salbutamol (100 mcg/puff) in acute asthma in the outpatient ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, prospective, randomized, and open-label study involved adult asthma patients with mild to moderate asthma exacerbation who attended the outpatient ED of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. The intervention arm received budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort<sup>®</sup> 160/4.5 mcg) turbuhaler, while the control arm received pMDI salbutamol with a valved holding chamber. Stratified randomization with variable baseline ICS use was employed. Direct discharge rate from outpatient ED was the primary outcome. Vital signs pre- and post-treatment between the two arms were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four (<i>n</i> = 37 for each arm) asthma patients were recruited. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the two arms. Direct discharge rates from ED were comparable between the intervention (94.6%) and the control (91.9%) arms (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Post-treatment outcomes (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, peak expiratory flow rate) were similar between the two arms, except for the higher increment of heart rate (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and lesser reduction of blood pressure in the control arm (<i>p</i> = 0.013). Intravenous hydrocortisone use was significantly higher in the control arm (<i>n</i> = 19, 51.4%) than in the budesonide/formoterol arm (<i>n</i> = 6, 16.2%) (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Budesonide/formoterol turbuhaler is as effective as pMDI salbutamol in treating asthma exacerbation in the outpatient ED with less effect on heart rate and lower usage of intravenous corticosteroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"694-704"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2024.2438094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) has suggested the need for more studies on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol in the Emergency Department (ED).

Objectives: We aimed to compare the outcomes of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 mcg/inhalation) turbuhaler versus pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) salbutamol (100 mcg/puff) in acute asthma in the outpatient ED.

Methods: This single-centre, prospective, randomized, and open-label study involved adult asthma patients with mild to moderate asthma exacerbation who attended the outpatient ED of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. The intervention arm received budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort® 160/4.5 mcg) turbuhaler, while the control arm received pMDI salbutamol with a valved holding chamber. Stratified randomization with variable baseline ICS use was employed. Direct discharge rate from outpatient ED was the primary outcome. Vital signs pre- and post-treatment between the two arms were also compared.

Results: Seventy-four (n = 37 for each arm) asthma patients were recruited. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the two arms. Direct discharge rates from ED were comparable between the intervention (94.6%) and the control (91.9%) arms (p = 1.000). Post-treatment outcomes (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, peak expiratory flow rate) were similar between the two arms, except for the higher increment of heart rate (p < 0.001) and lesser reduction of blood pressure in the control arm (p = 0.013). Intravenous hydrocortisone use was significantly higher in the control arm (n = 19, 51.4%) than in the budesonide/formoterol arm (n = 6, 16.2%) (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Budesonide/formoterol turbuhaler is as effective as pMDI salbutamol in treating asthma exacerbation in the outpatient ED with less effect on heart rate and lower usage of intravenous corticosteroids.

布地奈德/福莫特罗与pMDI沙丁胺醇在门诊急诊科治疗急性哮喘:一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签的研究。
全球哮喘倡议(GINA)建议在急诊科(ED)对吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)-福莫特罗进行更多的研究。目的:比较布地奈德/福莫特罗(160/4.5 mcg/次吸入)涡流吸入器与加压计量吸入器(pMDI)沙丁胺醇(100mcg/次吸入)治疗急性哮喘门诊急诊科的结果。方法:这项单中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签的研究纳入了在马来西亚一家三级医院门诊急诊科就诊的轻度至中度哮喘加重的成年哮喘患者。干预组接受布地奈德/福莫特罗(Symbicort®160/4.5mcg)涡流调节器,对照组接受pMDI沙丁胺醇带阀式保持室。采用分层随机化和可变基线ICS使用。门诊急诊科直接出院率为主要观察指标。比较两组患者治疗前后的生命体征。结果共纳入74例哮喘患者(每组37例)。两组的基线临床特征具有可比性。ED直接出院率在干预组(94.6%)和对照组(91.9%)之间具有可比性(p = 1.000)。两组治疗后的结果(呼吸率、血氧饱和度、呼气峰流量)相似,但心率升高(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信