Impact of a Prototype 29:1 Ratio Grid on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Abdominal Angiography: Evaluation in a Pig Model.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Thomas Werncke, Lena S Becker, Sabine K Maschke, Inga Brüsch, Regina Rumpel, Frank K Wacker, Bernhard C Meyer
{"title":"Impact of a Prototype 29:1 Ratio Grid on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Abdominal Angiography: Evaluation in a Pig Model.","authors":"Thomas Werncke, Lena S Becker, Sabine K Maschke, Inga Brüsch, Regina Rumpel, Frank K Wacker, Bernhard C Meyer","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a prototype grid with a 29:1 ratio (r29) and a 15:1 (r15) grid on the image quality (IQ) and radiation dose in abdominal angiography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six typical abdominal angiographic image scenarios were created in 4 pigs. Polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates were used to add 10 cm of patient equivalent thickness to simulate different body types. Fluoroscopic images were acquired with a source-to-image receptor distance of 120 cm. Tantalum- and iron-specific acquisition protocols at different IQ levels were acquired. IQ of radiation dose equivalent image pairs, created with the r29 and r15 grids, respectively, was quantitatively evaluated using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. Differences in radiation dose were estimated using the dose-weighted CNR. Two blinded readers compared IQ of these images using a Likert scale. In a second step, the readers selected pairs of the r29 and r15 images with subjectively equivalent IQ. Radiation doses were then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the r15 grid, the r29 grid images achieved similar CNR at an average of 26% (±12%) lower radiation dose at a mean patient equivalent thickness of 26 cm and 36 cm. Both readers noted a significant increase in IQ (P < 0.001) for dose equivalent images, whereas the interobserver agreement was 0.59. For the selected IQ equivalent images, a radiation dose reduction of 38% (±17%; P < 0.001, interobserver agreement 0.92) was noted when using the r29 grid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an r29 grid at a large source-to-image receptor distance can significantly improve the IQ compared with the r15 grid at the same radiation dose in abdominal angiography or can reduce radiation dose while preserving IQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a prototype grid with a 29:1 ratio (r29) and a 15:1 (r15) grid on the image quality (IQ) and radiation dose in abdominal angiography.

Materials and methods: Six typical abdominal angiographic image scenarios were created in 4 pigs. Polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates were used to add 10 cm of patient equivalent thickness to simulate different body types. Fluoroscopic images were acquired with a source-to-image receptor distance of 120 cm. Tantalum- and iron-specific acquisition protocols at different IQ levels were acquired. IQ of radiation dose equivalent image pairs, created with the r29 and r15 grids, respectively, was quantitatively evaluated using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. Differences in radiation dose were estimated using the dose-weighted CNR. Two blinded readers compared IQ of these images using a Likert scale. In a second step, the readers selected pairs of the r29 and r15 images with subjectively equivalent IQ. Radiation doses were then compared.

Results: Compared with the r15 grid, the r29 grid images achieved similar CNR at an average of 26% (±12%) lower radiation dose at a mean patient equivalent thickness of 26 cm and 36 cm. Both readers noted a significant increase in IQ (P < 0.001) for dose equivalent images, whereas the interobserver agreement was 0.59. For the selected IQ equivalent images, a radiation dose reduction of 38% (±17%; P < 0.001, interobserver agreement 0.92) was noted when using the r29 grid.

Conclusions: The use of an r29 grid at a large source-to-image receptor distance can significantly improve the IQ compared with the r15 grid at the same radiation dose in abdominal angiography or can reduce radiation dose while preserving IQ.

原型29:1比例网格对腹部血管造影图像质量和辐射剂量的影响:猪模型的评估。
目的:本研究的目的是评估29:1比例(r29)和15:1比例(r15)的原型网格对腹部血管造影图像质量(IQ)和辐射剂量的影响。材料与方法:选取4头猪,建立6种典型的腹部血管造影图像场景。采用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和铝板加10 cm患者等效厚度模拟不同体型。在源到图像受体的距离为120 cm时获得透视图像。获得了不同智商水平的钽和铁特异性获取协议。分别用r29和r15栅格生成的辐射剂量等效图像对的IQ,通过对比噪声比(CNR)测量进行定量评价。使用剂量加权CNR估计辐射剂量的差异。两名盲人读者用李克特量表比较了这些图片的智商。在第二步中,读者从r29和r15的图像中选择了主观上智商相当的一对。然后比较辐射剂量。结果:与r15网格相比,r29网格图像在平均患者等效厚度为26 cm和36 cm时,辐射剂量平均降低26%(±12%),CNR相似。两位读者都注意到,对于剂量等效图像,智商显著提高(P < 0.001),而观察者之间的一致性为0.59。对于选定的IQ等效图像,辐射剂量降低38%(±17%;使用r29网格时,P < 0.001,观察者间一致性0.92)。结论:与相同辐射剂量下r15栅格相比,在较大的源-像受体距离处使用r29栅格可显著提高腹部血管造影患者的IQ或在降低辐射剂量的同时保持IQ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信