Development and verification of non-supervised smartphone-based methods for assessing pure-tone thresholds and loudness perception.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Chen Xu, Lena Schell-Majoor, Birger Kollmeier
{"title":"Development and verification of non-supervised smartphone-based methods for assessing pure-tone thresholds and loudness perception.","authors":"Chen Xu, Lena Schell-Majoor, Birger Kollmeier","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2424876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The benefit of using smartphones for hearing tests in a non-supervised, rapid, and contactless way has drawn a lot of interest, especially if supra-threshold measures are assessed that go beyond audiogram-based measures alone. It is unclear, nevertheless, how well these measures compare to more supervised and regulated manual audiometric assessments. The aim of this study is to validate such smartphone-based methods against standardised laboratory assessments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pure-tone audiometry and categorical loudness scaling (CLS) were used. Three conditions with varying degrees of supervision were created and compared. In order to assess binaural and spectral loudness summation, both narrowband monaural and broadband binaural noise have been examined as CLS test stimuli.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong><i>N</i> = 21 individuals with normal hearing and <i>N</i> = 16 participants with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tests conducted here did not show any distinctions between smartphone-based and laboratory-based methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-supervised listening tests via smartphone may serve as a valid, reliable, and cost-effective approach, e.g. for pure-tone audiometry, CLS, and the evaluation of binaural and spectral loudness summation. In addition, the supra-threshold tests can be constructed to be invariant against missing calibration and external noise which makes them more robust for smartphone usage than audiogram measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2424876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The benefit of using smartphones for hearing tests in a non-supervised, rapid, and contactless way has drawn a lot of interest, especially if supra-threshold measures are assessed that go beyond audiogram-based measures alone. It is unclear, nevertheless, how well these measures compare to more supervised and regulated manual audiometric assessments. The aim of this study is to validate such smartphone-based methods against standardised laboratory assessments.

Design: Pure-tone audiometry and categorical loudness scaling (CLS) were used. Three conditions with varying degrees of supervision were created and compared. In order to assess binaural and spectral loudness summation, both narrowband monaural and broadband binaural noise have been examined as CLS test stimuli.

Study sample: N = 21 individuals with normal hearing and N = 16 participants with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Results: The tests conducted here did not show any distinctions between smartphone-based and laboratory-based methods.

Conclusions: Non-supervised listening tests via smartphone may serve as a valid, reliable, and cost-effective approach, e.g. for pure-tone audiometry, CLS, and the evaluation of binaural and spectral loudness summation. In addition, the supra-threshold tests can be constructed to be invariant against missing calibration and external noise which makes them more robust for smartphone usage than audiogram measures.

开发和验证基于智能手机的非监督方法,用于评估纯音阈值和响度感知。
目的:使用智能手机进行无监督、快速和非接触式听力测试的好处已经引起了很多人的兴趣,特别是如果评估的超阈值措施超出了单独的基于听力图的措施。然而,目前尚不清楚这些措施与更多监督和规范的人工听力评估相比效果如何。这项研究的目的是验证这种基于智能手机的方法与标准化实验室评估。设计:采用纯音测听法和分类响度量表(CLS)。并对三种不同监管程度的条件进行了比较。为了评估双耳和频谱响度总和,窄带单耳和宽带双耳噪声作为CLS测试刺激进行了研究。研究样本:听力正常者21人,轻度至中度听力损失者16人。结果:在这里进行的测试没有显示出基于智能手机和基于实验室的方法之间的任何区别。结论:通过智能手机进行的无监督听力测试可以作为一种有效、可靠和经济的方法,例如用于纯音测听、CLS以及双耳和频谱响度和的评估。此外,超阈值测试可以构建为对缺失校准和外部噪声的不变性,这使得它们对智能手机的使用比听力图测量更健壮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信