Modeling functional connectivity changes during an auditory language task using line graph neural networks.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fncom.2024.1471229
Stein Acker, Jinqing Liang, Ninet Sinaii, Kristen Wingert, Atsuko Kurosu, Sunder Rajan, Sara Inati, William H Theodore, Nadia Biassou
{"title":"Modeling functional connectivity changes during an auditory language task using line graph neural networks.","authors":"Stein Acker, Jinqing Liang, Ninet Sinaii, Kristen Wingert, Atsuko Kurosu, Sunder Rajan, Sara Inati, William H Theodore, Nadia Biassou","doi":"10.3389/fncom.2024.1471229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional connectivity (FC) refers to the activation correlation between different brain regions. FC networks as typically represented as graphs with brain regions of interest (ROIs) as nodes and functional correlation as edges. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are machine learning architectures used to analyze FC graphs. However, traditional GNNs are limited in their ability to characterize FC edge attributes because they typically emphasize the importance of ROI node-based brain activation data. Line GNNs convert the edges of the original graph to nodes in the transformed graph, thereby emphasizing the FC between brain regions. We hypothesize that line GNNs will outperform traditional GNNs in FC applications. We investigated the performance of two common GNN architectures (GraphSAGE and GCN) trained on line and traditional graphs predicting task-associated FC changes across two datasets. The first dataset was from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) with 205 participants, the second was a dataset with 12 participants. The HCP dataset detailed FC changes in participants during a story-listening task, while the second dataset included the FC changes in a different auditory language task. Our findings from the HCP dataset indicated that line GNNs achieved lower mean squared error compared to traditional GNNs, with the line GraphSAGE model outperforming the traditional GraphSAGE by 18% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). When applying the same models to the second dataset, both line GNNs also showed statistically significant improvements over their traditional counterparts with little to no overfitting. We believe this shows that line GNN models demonstrate promising utility in FC studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12363,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1471229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2024.1471229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional connectivity (FC) refers to the activation correlation between different brain regions. FC networks as typically represented as graphs with brain regions of interest (ROIs) as nodes and functional correlation as edges. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are machine learning architectures used to analyze FC graphs. However, traditional GNNs are limited in their ability to characterize FC edge attributes because they typically emphasize the importance of ROI node-based brain activation data. Line GNNs convert the edges of the original graph to nodes in the transformed graph, thereby emphasizing the FC between brain regions. We hypothesize that line GNNs will outperform traditional GNNs in FC applications. We investigated the performance of two common GNN architectures (GraphSAGE and GCN) trained on line and traditional graphs predicting task-associated FC changes across two datasets. The first dataset was from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) with 205 participants, the second was a dataset with 12 participants. The HCP dataset detailed FC changes in participants during a story-listening task, while the second dataset included the FC changes in a different auditory language task. Our findings from the HCP dataset indicated that line GNNs achieved lower mean squared error compared to traditional GNNs, with the line GraphSAGE model outperforming the traditional GraphSAGE by 18% (p < 0.0001). When applying the same models to the second dataset, both line GNNs also showed statistically significant improvements over their traditional counterparts with little to no overfitting. We believe this shows that line GNN models demonstrate promising utility in FC studies.

使用线形图神经网络在听觉语言任务中建模功能连接变化。
功能连通性(FC)是指大脑不同区域之间的激活相关性。FC网络通常以感兴趣的大脑区域(roi)为节点,功能关联为边缘的图形表示。图神经网络(gnn)是用于分析FC图的机器学习架构。然而,传统gnn在表征FC边缘属性方面的能力有限,因为它们通常强调基于ROI节点的大脑激活数据的重要性。Line gnn将原始图的边缘转换为转换后图中的节点,从而强调脑区之间的FC。我们假设线gnn在FC应用中将优于传统gnn。我们研究了两种常见的GNN架构(GraphSAGE和GCN)在在线和传统图形上的性能,预测了两个数据集之间任务相关的FC变化。第一个数据集来自人类连接体项目(HCP),有205名参与者,第二个数据集有12名参与者。HCP数据集详细描述了参与者在听故事任务期间的FC变化,而第二个数据集包括了不同听觉语言任务中的FC变化。我们在HCP数据集中的研究结果表明,与传统gnn相比,线gnn的均方误差更低,其中线GraphSAGE模型的性能比传统GraphSAGE高出18% (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to promoting theoretical modeling of brain function and fostering interdisciplinary interactions between theoretical and experimental neuroscience. Progress in understanding the amazing capabilities of the brain is still limited, and we believe that it will only come with deep theoretical thinking and mutually stimulating cooperation between different disciplines and approaches. We therefore invite original contributions on a wide range of topics that present the fruits of such cooperation, or provide stimuli for future alliances. We aim to provide an interactive forum for cutting-edge theoretical studies of the nervous system, and for promulgating the best theoretical research to the broader neuroscience community. Models of all styles and at all levels are welcome, from biophysically motivated realistic simulations of neurons and synapses to high-level abstract models of inference and decision making. While the journal is primarily focused on theoretically based and driven research, we welcome experimental studies that validate and test theoretical conclusions. Also: comp neuro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信