LingQiao Li, Han Bao, ErChi Zhang, ShuTing Wu, XiaoYang Jiang, YuJia Xiao, ShiJing Fan, YiXin Luo, YunYun Huang, Pei Zhang, Michael Swain, Ahmed Elsheikh, ShiHao Chen, XiaoBo Zheng
{"title":"Effect of corneal cross-linking on biomechanical properties of swollen rabbit corneas.","authors":"LingQiao Li, Han Bao, ErChi Zhang, ShuTing Wu, XiaoYang Jiang, YuJia Xiao, ShiJing Fan, YiXin Luo, YunYun Huang, Pei Zhang, Michael Swain, Ahmed Elsheikh, ShiHao Chen, XiaoBo Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.exer.2024.110191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is an effective method to prevent the progression of keratoconus. CXL combined with hypotonic riboflavin solution is a modified treatment for thin corneas, which are deemed to be below the safe thickness threshold. In this study, rabbit corneas were subjected to different hydration levels using different osmolarity of riboflavin dextran solutions before CXL. Inflation testing was performed to evaluate the corneal biomechanical stiffening effect of hypotonic riboflavin solutions crosslinking. One-month post-CXL, the stromal demarcation line depth (DLD) and the biomechanical property parameter - tangent modulus (Et) - were measured. All CXL groups showed higher Et than the corresponding Ctrl groups (all P < 0.001), however, the Et values showed no statistical differences between the CXL-ed groups with different hydration levels (all P > 0.05). The relative depth ratio of DLD to total corneal thickness (TCT) did not show significant differences (P > 0.05), while the DLD was statistically different in three CXL groups (P < 0.001). The research suggested that riboflavin solutions with different osmolarities are suitable for preoperative swelling of corneas with different thickness ranges. Furthermore, crosslinking with hypotonic riboflavin solutions has no significant effect on corneal biomechanical improvement under a certain degree of hydration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12177,"journal":{"name":"Experimental eye research","volume":" ","pages":"110191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental eye research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2024.110191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is an effective method to prevent the progression of keratoconus. CXL combined with hypotonic riboflavin solution is a modified treatment for thin corneas, which are deemed to be below the safe thickness threshold. In this study, rabbit corneas were subjected to different hydration levels using different osmolarity of riboflavin dextran solutions before CXL. Inflation testing was performed to evaluate the corneal biomechanical stiffening effect of hypotonic riboflavin solutions crosslinking. One-month post-CXL, the stromal demarcation line depth (DLD) and the biomechanical property parameter - tangent modulus (Et) - were measured. All CXL groups showed higher Et than the corresponding Ctrl groups (all P < 0.001), however, the Et values showed no statistical differences between the CXL-ed groups with different hydration levels (all P > 0.05). The relative depth ratio of DLD to total corneal thickness (TCT) did not show significant differences (P > 0.05), while the DLD was statistically different in three CXL groups (P < 0.001). The research suggested that riboflavin solutions with different osmolarities are suitable for preoperative swelling of corneas with different thickness ranges. Furthermore, crosslinking with hypotonic riboflavin solutions has no significant effect on corneal biomechanical improvement under a certain degree of hydration.
期刊介绍:
The primary goal of Experimental Eye Research is to publish original research papers on all aspects of experimental biology of the eye and ocular tissues that seek to define the mechanisms of normal function and/or disease. Studies of ocular tissues that encompass the disciplines of cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, molecular biology, physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, immunology or microbiology are most welcomed. Manuscripts that are purely clinical or in a surgical area of ophthalmology are not appropriate for submission to Experimental Eye Research and if received will be returned without review.