A head-to-head comparison of breast lesion's conspicuity at contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11195-4
Ambra Santonocito, Calogero Zarcaro, Layla Zeitouni, Francesca Ferrara, Panagiotis Kapetas, Thomas H Helbich, Paola Clauser, Pascal A T Baltzer
{"title":"A head-to-head comparison of breast lesion's conspicuity at contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI.","authors":"Ambra Santonocito, Calogero Zarcaro, Layla Zeitouni, Francesca Ferrara, Panagiotis Kapetas, Thomas H Helbich, Paola Clauser, Pascal A T Baltzer","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11195-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lesion conspicuity, the relative enhancement of a lesion compared to surrounding tissue, is a new descriptor in the ACR BI-RADS 2022 CEM supplement. We compared lesion conspicuity in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) in patients with suspicious breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>IRB-approved retrospective study; three blinded readers rated 462 indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions in 388 patients (54.2 ± 11 years; range 30-90) who underwent CEM and CE-MRI from 2018 to 2022. Each lesion's conspicuity was scored from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating excellent conspicuity. Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC) were used for comparison, with sub-analyses for benign and malignant lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VGC analysis showed a significant AUC of 0.670 to 0.723 (p < 0.001) favouring CE-MRI. No lesion enhancement (score 1) was observed in 16.2% of CE-MRI and 44.7% of CEM. Excellent conspicuity was seen in 29.6% of CE-MRI and 11.9% of CEM. Sub-analysis showed higher conspicuity on CE-MRI for both malignant (AUC 0.665 to 0.732, p < 0.001) and benign lesions (AUC 0.734 to 0.798, p < 0.001). CE-MRI showed higher lesion conspicuity compared to CEM both for non-mass lesions (0.656) and for mass lesions 0.605.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CE-MRI shows significantly higher conspicuity for benign and malignant breast lesions compared to CEM, especially for benign lesions. The low conspicuity of benign lesions on CEM may help reduce false positives in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Lesion conspicuity is a new descriptor for lesion enhancement according to the new CEM lexicon. Data correlating lesion conspicuity with malignancy likelihood are limited. Findings Lesion conspicuity is higher for contrast-enhanced-MRI than for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) for all lesions but significantly better for benign lesions. Clinical relevance The low conspicuity of benign lesions on CEM may reduce false-positive results, making it a valuable tool in breast cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"3070-3079"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11195-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Lesion conspicuity, the relative enhancement of a lesion compared to surrounding tissue, is a new descriptor in the ACR BI-RADS 2022 CEM supplement. We compared lesion conspicuity in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) in patients with suspicious breast lesions.

Materials and methods: IRB-approved retrospective study; three blinded readers rated 462 indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions in 388 patients (54.2 ± 11 years; range 30-90) who underwent CEM and CE-MRI from 2018 to 2022. Each lesion's conspicuity was scored from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating excellent conspicuity. Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC) were used for comparison, with sub-analyses for benign and malignant lesions.

Results: VGC analysis showed a significant AUC of 0.670 to 0.723 (p < 0.001) favouring CE-MRI. No lesion enhancement (score 1) was observed in 16.2% of CE-MRI and 44.7% of CEM. Excellent conspicuity was seen in 29.6% of CE-MRI and 11.9% of CEM. Sub-analysis showed higher conspicuity on CE-MRI for both malignant (AUC 0.665 to 0.732, p < 0.001) and benign lesions (AUC 0.734 to 0.798, p < 0.001). CE-MRI showed higher lesion conspicuity compared to CEM both for non-mass lesions (0.656) and for mass lesions 0.605.

Conclusion: CE-MRI shows significantly higher conspicuity for benign and malignant breast lesions compared to CEM, especially for benign lesions. The low conspicuity of benign lesions on CEM may help reduce false positives in clinical practice.

Key points: Question Lesion conspicuity is a new descriptor for lesion enhancement according to the new CEM lexicon. Data correlating lesion conspicuity with malignancy likelihood are limited. Findings Lesion conspicuity is higher for contrast-enhanced-MRI than for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) for all lesions but significantly better for benign lesions. Clinical relevance The low conspicuity of benign lesions on CEM may reduce false-positive results, making it a valuable tool in breast cancer screening.

对比增强乳房x光造影和MRI对乳腺病变显著性的正面比较。
目的:病变显著性,即病灶相对于周围组织的相对增强,是ACR BI-RADS 2022 CEM补充中的一个新描述。我们比较了可疑乳腺病变患者的对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)和对比增强MRI (CE-MRI)的病变显著性。材料和方法:irb批准的回顾性研究;三名盲法读者对388例患者中的462个不确定或可疑的乳腺病变进行了评分(54.2±11年;在2018年至2022年期间接受了CEM和CE-MRI检查。每个病变的显著性从1到5分,5分表示显著性极好。采用视觉分级特征(VGC)分析和曲线下面积(AUC)进行比较,并对良、恶性病变进行亚分析。结果:VGC分析显示AUC为0.670 ~ 0.723 (p)。结论:CE-MRI对乳腺良恶性病变的显著性高于CEM,尤其是对良性病变的显著性。良性病变在CEM上的低显著性可能有助于减少临床实践中的假阳性。病灶显著性是根据新版CEM词典对病灶增强的一个新的描述。有关病变显著性与恶性肿瘤可能性的资料有限。结果mri造影对所有病变的明显程度均高于乳房造影(CEM),但对良性病变的明显程度更高。CEM良性病变的低显著性可能减少假阳性结果,使其成为乳腺癌筛查的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信