Alcohol-related stimuli disrupt inhibitory control in heavy but not light drinkers in a crowdsourced sample.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mia E Radevski, Jessica Weafer, Justin C Strickland, Jessica Marty, Chana K Akins
{"title":"Alcohol-related stimuli disrupt inhibitory control in heavy but not light drinkers in a crowdsourced sample.","authors":"Mia E Radevski, Jessica Weafer, Justin C Strickland, Jessica Marty, Chana K Akins","doi":"10.1037/pha0000750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association between inhibitory control and alcohol use has been well established. However, studies comparing the effects of alcohol cues on disinhibition in heavy and light drinkers have reported mixed results. The present study used a crowdsourcing platform, Prolific, to assess the effects of alcohol-related cues on inhibitory control in light drinkers versus heavy drinkers. Eligible participants were categorized as light or heavy drinkers based on National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism classifications. Participants (43 women and 65 men) then completed the Attentional Bias-Behavioral Activation task to assess inhibitory control. Subjects were randomized to either an alcohol or neutral-go condition. Inhibitory failures (IF) were measured as pressing a key when the assigned go cue was presented before the no-go cue. Analyses revealed a significant Drinking Status × Condition interaction, <i>F</i>(1, 99) = 5.656, <i>p</i> = .019, η<i><sub>p</sub></i>² = 0.054. IF were greater in the alcohol-go compared to the neutral-go condition for heavy drinkers, <i>t</i>(46) = -1.848, <i>p</i> = .036, <i>d</i> = 0.538, but not light drinkers (<i>p</i> = .226, <i>d</i> = 0.197). Additionally, heavy drinkers had more IF than light drinkers in the alcohol-go condition, <i>t</i>(55) = -2.152, <i>p</i> = .018, <i>d</i> = 0.571, but not in the neutral-go condition (<i>p</i> = .266, <i>d</i> = 0.180). Results demonstrated that alcohol images disrupt inhibitory control in heavy drinkers but not light drinkers. The results from the present study extend research by using a crowdsourcing platform to replicate findings of disinhibition in heavy drinkers but not in light drinkers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The association between inhibitory control and alcohol use has been well established. However, studies comparing the effects of alcohol cues on disinhibition in heavy and light drinkers have reported mixed results. The present study used a crowdsourcing platform, Prolific, to assess the effects of alcohol-related cues on inhibitory control in light drinkers versus heavy drinkers. Eligible participants were categorized as light or heavy drinkers based on National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism classifications. Participants (43 women and 65 men) then completed the Attentional Bias-Behavioral Activation task to assess inhibitory control. Subjects were randomized to either an alcohol or neutral-go condition. Inhibitory failures (IF) were measured as pressing a key when the assigned go cue was presented before the no-go cue. Analyses revealed a significant Drinking Status × Condition interaction, F(1, 99) = 5.656, p = .019, ηp² = 0.054. IF were greater in the alcohol-go compared to the neutral-go condition for heavy drinkers, t(46) = -1.848, p = .036, d = 0.538, but not light drinkers (p = .226, d = 0.197). Additionally, heavy drinkers had more IF than light drinkers in the alcohol-go condition, t(55) = -2.152, p = .018, d = 0.571, but not in the neutral-go condition (p = .266, d = 0.180). Results demonstrated that alcohol images disrupt inhibitory control in heavy drinkers but not light drinkers. The results from the present study extend research by using a crowdsourcing platform to replicate findings of disinhibition in heavy drinkers but not in light drinkers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在一个众包样本中,酒精相关的刺激会破坏重度饮酒者而非轻度饮酒者的抑制控制。
抑制控制和酒精使用之间的联系已经得到了很好的证实。然而,比较酒精对重度饮酒者和轻度饮酒者去抑制作用的影响的研究报告了不同的结果。目前的研究使用了一个众包平台,多产,来评估酒精相关线索对轻度饮酒者和重度饮酒者抑制控制的影响。根据国家酒精滥用和酒精中毒研究所的分类,符合条件的参与者被分为轻度或重度饮酒者。参与者(43名女性和65名男性)随后完成了注意偏差-行为激活任务,以评估抑制控制。受试者被随机分为酒精组和中性组。抑制失败(IF)被测量为当指定的围棋提示在不去的提示之前出现时按下一个键。分析结果显示,饮酒状态与饮酒条件的交互作用显著,F(1,99) = 5.656, p = 0.019, ηp²= 0.054。酒精组的IF高于重度饮酒者的中性状态,t(46) = -1.848, p = 0.036, d = 0.538,但轻度饮酒者没有(p = 0.226, d = 0.197)。此外,重度饮酒者在酒精-go条件下比轻度饮酒者有更多的IF, t(55) = -2.152, p = 0.018, d = 0.571,但在中性-go条件下没有(p = 0.266, d = 0.180)。结果表明,酒精图像破坏了重度饮酒者的抑制控制,而不是轻度饮酒者。本研究的结果通过使用众包平台来扩展研究,以复制重度饮酒者而不是轻度饮酒者的抑制解除的发现。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信