{"title":"Electromigration of Charged Analytes Through Immiscible Fluids in Multiphasic Electrophoresis","authors":"Md Nazibul Islam, Yang Liu, Amy E. Herr","doi":"10.1002/elps.202400192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiphasic buffer systems have been of greatest interest in electrophoresis and liquid–liquid electrotransfer; this study extends that foundation by exploring the interplay of the geometric and viscous properties of an interleaving oil layer on the electrotransfer of a charged analyte from an aqueous solution into a hydrogel. We utilized finite element analysis to examine two complementary configurations: one being electrotransfer of a charged analyte (protein) in an aqueous phase into a surrounding hydrogel layer and another being electrotransfer of the protein from that originating aqueous phase—through an interleaving oil layer of predetermined viscosity and thickness—and into a surrounding hydrogel layer. Results indicate that the presence of an oil layer leads to increased skew of the injected peak. To explain this difference in injection dispersion, we utilize Probstein's framework and compare the Péclet (<i>Pe</i>) number with the ratio between length scales characteristic to the axial and radial dispersion, respectively. The formulation assigns electrotransfer conditions into six different dispersion regimes. We show that the presence or absence of an interleaving oil layer moves the observed peak dispersion into distinct electrotransfer regimes; the presence of an oil layer augments the electrophoretic mobility mismatch among the different phases, resulting in a five-fold increase in <i>Pe</i> and a six-fold increase in the ratio between the axial to radial dispersion characteristic lengths. We further show that oil viscosity significantly influences resultant injection dispersion. A decrease in oil-layer viscosity from 0.08 to 0.02 Pa s results in a >100% decrease in injection dispersion. Our theoretical predictions were experimentally validated by comparing the electrotransfer regimes of three different mineral oil samples. We show that lowering the oil viscosity to 0.0039 Pa s results in an injection regime similar to that of the absence of an oil layer. Understanding of the impact of electrotransfer of charged species across multiple immiscible fluid layers on peak dispersion informs the design of multiphasic electrophoresis systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":"46 1-2","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.202400192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiphasic buffer systems have been of greatest interest in electrophoresis and liquid–liquid electrotransfer; this study extends that foundation by exploring the interplay of the geometric and viscous properties of an interleaving oil layer on the electrotransfer of a charged analyte from an aqueous solution into a hydrogel. We utilized finite element analysis to examine two complementary configurations: one being electrotransfer of a charged analyte (protein) in an aqueous phase into a surrounding hydrogel layer and another being electrotransfer of the protein from that originating aqueous phase—through an interleaving oil layer of predetermined viscosity and thickness—and into a surrounding hydrogel layer. Results indicate that the presence of an oil layer leads to increased skew of the injected peak. To explain this difference in injection dispersion, we utilize Probstein's framework and compare the Péclet (Pe) number with the ratio between length scales characteristic to the axial and radial dispersion, respectively. The formulation assigns electrotransfer conditions into six different dispersion regimes. We show that the presence or absence of an interleaving oil layer moves the observed peak dispersion into distinct electrotransfer regimes; the presence of an oil layer augments the electrophoretic mobility mismatch among the different phases, resulting in a five-fold increase in Pe and a six-fold increase in the ratio between the axial to radial dispersion characteristic lengths. We further show that oil viscosity significantly influences resultant injection dispersion. A decrease in oil-layer viscosity from 0.08 to 0.02 Pa s results in a >100% decrease in injection dispersion. Our theoretical predictions were experimentally validated by comparing the electrotransfer regimes of three different mineral oil samples. We show that lowering the oil viscosity to 0.0039 Pa s results in an injection regime similar to that of the absence of an oil layer. Understanding of the impact of electrotransfer of charged species across multiple immiscible fluid layers on peak dispersion informs the design of multiphasic electrophoresis systems.
多相缓冲系统一直是电泳和液-液电转移的最大兴趣;本研究通过探索交错油层的几何和粘性特性对带电分析物从水溶液到水凝胶的电转移的相互作用,扩展了这一基础。我们利用有限元分析来检查两种互补的结构:一种是水相中的带电分析物(蛋白质)电转移到周围的水凝胶层中,另一种是蛋白质从原始水相中电转移——通过预定粘度和厚度的交错油层——进入周围的水凝胶层。结果表明,油层的存在导致注入峰的偏度增大。为了解释注射分散的这种差异,我们利用Probstein的框架,并将psamclet (Pe)数分别与长度尺度特征与轴向和径向分散之间的比率进行比较。该公式将电转移条件分配到六种不同的色散状态。我们表明,交错油层的存在或不存在将观察到的峰色散移动到不同的电转移区;油层的存在增加了不同相之间的电泳迁移率不匹配,导致Pe增加5倍,轴向与径向色散特征长度之间的比率增加6倍。我们进一步表明,油粘度显著影响最终的喷射分散。当油层粘度从0.08降到0.02 Pa时,注入分散度降低了100%。通过比较三种不同矿物油样品的电转移机制,我们的理论预测得到了实验验证。我们表明,将油粘度降低到0.0039 Pa s,会导致与没有油层相似的注入状态。了解带电物质在多个不混相流体层上的电转移对峰值分散的影响,可以为多相电泳系统的设计提供信息。
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.