ESCAPE study: Cannabidiol use in patients treated for substance use disorders, prevalence of use and characteristics of users.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mélanie Duval, Marion Istvan, Morgane Rousselet, Edouard-Jules Laforgue, Marie Grall-Bronnec, Claire Mauriat, Caroline Victorri-Vigneau
{"title":"ESCAPE study: Cannabidiol use in patients treated for substance use disorders, prevalence of use and characteristics of users.","authors":"Mélanie Duval, Marion Istvan, Morgane Rousselet, Edouard-Jules Laforgue, Marie Grall-Bronnec, Claire Mauriat, Caroline Victorri-Vigneau","doi":"10.1159/000541887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cannibidiol (CBD) is one of the two primary phytocannabinoids found in cannabis. Its diverse pharmacological properties suggest potential benefits for a wide range of medical conditions. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of CBD use among patients being treated for substance use disorder. Additionally, we aimed to characterize the pattern of CBD use and describe the profiles of users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to two substance use disorder departments between May 6, 2020, and July 23, 2021were included in the study. Sociodemographic, medical and substance use data, including CBD use, were collected. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was performed to identify substance uses most frequently correlated with CBD use. Multivariate analyses were also conducted to identify factors associated with CBD use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of CBD use in the past 12 months among the 183 patients was 38.2%. However, at the time of the study, 63% had stopped using CBD, primarily due to its perceived ineffectiveness and cost. CBD was commonly consumed via inhalation, either by smoking the plant or using e-cigarette liquids. The MCA revealed that while there is no typical profile of CBD users, they were more likely to use sedative substances rather than stimulants. CBD users were younger and more likely to have psychiatric comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of CBD use was notably high. Given the significant risk of drug interactions with CBD and its wide variability in composition, it is crucial for clinicians to routinely inquire about CBD use. The potential for self-therapeutic or recreational use in these patients appears to be underestimated.</p>","PeriodicalId":11902,"journal":{"name":"European Addiction Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Addiction Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cannibidiol (CBD) is one of the two primary phytocannabinoids found in cannabis. Its diverse pharmacological properties suggest potential benefits for a wide range of medical conditions. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of CBD use among patients being treated for substance use disorder. Additionally, we aimed to characterize the pattern of CBD use and describe the profiles of users.

Methods: Patients admitted to two substance use disorder departments between May 6, 2020, and July 23, 2021were included in the study. Sociodemographic, medical and substance use data, including CBD use, were collected. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was performed to identify substance uses most frequently correlated with CBD use. Multivariate analyses were also conducted to identify factors associated with CBD use.

Results: The prevalence of CBD use in the past 12 months among the 183 patients was 38.2%. However, at the time of the study, 63% had stopped using CBD, primarily due to its perceived ineffectiveness and cost. CBD was commonly consumed via inhalation, either by smoking the plant or using e-cigarette liquids. The MCA revealed that while there is no typical profile of CBD users, they were more likely to use sedative substances rather than stimulants. CBD users were younger and more likely to have psychiatric comorbidities.

Conclusion: The prevalence of CBD use was notably high. Given the significant risk of drug interactions with CBD and its wide variability in composition, it is crucial for clinicians to routinely inquire about CBD use. The potential for self-therapeutic or recreational use in these patients appears to be underestimated.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Addiction Research
European Addiction Research SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Addiction Research'' is a unique international scientific journal for the rapid publication of innovative research covering all aspects of addiction and related disorders. Representing an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of recent data and expert opinion, it reflects the importance of a comprehensive approach to resolve the problems of substance abuse and addiction in Europe. Coverage ranges from clinical and research advances in the fields of psychiatry, biology, pharmacology and epidemiology to social, and legal implications of policy decisions. The goal is to facilitate open discussion among those interested in the scientific and clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis and therapy as well as dealing with legal issues. An excellent range of original papers makes ‘European Addiction Research’ the forum of choice for all.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信