Jeong-Yeon Ji, Wonjae Cha, Young Ho Jung, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Woo-Jin Jeong
{"title":"Core Needle Biopsy May Predict Prognosis Preoperatively in Parotid Cancer.","authors":"Jeong-Yeon Ji, Wonjae Cha, Young Ho Jung, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Woo-Jin Jeong","doi":"10.21053/ceo.2024.00227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Salivary gland tumors present a diagnostic challenge, with preoperative false-negative results frequently leading to an unexpected diagnosis of malignancy after parotidectomy. This study was conducted to explore the clinical utility of preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB) in diagnosing malignancies before primary parotidectomy and to assess the prognostic implications of CNB for parotid gland cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 615 patients who underwent preoperative CNB and parotidectomy for primary parotid tumors from 2003 to 2023 at a tertiary referral hospital. Among these patients, 102 who were diagnosed with primary parotid malignancy following parotidectomy were examined regarding survival outcomes. Disease-free survival (DFS) and predictive factors were assessed through univariable and multivariable analyses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of CNB were determined. These metrics were then compared to those of a separate cohort of 547 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and parotidectomy within the same timeframe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the CNB group, the 5-year predicted DFS was 86.9% (95% CI, 79.2%-95.3%). Multivariable analysis identified male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 8.48; 95% CI, 1.05-68.76) and a CNB finding of malignancy (HR, 8.20; 95% CI, 1.01-66.15) as factors significantly associated with decreased DFS. CNB demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (89.0%; 95% CI, 81.2%-94.4%) and NPV (97.6%; 95% CI, 95.7%-98.8%) compared to FNA, which had a sensitivity of 45.2% (95% CI, 33.5%-57.3%) and an NPV of 90.8% (95% CI, 87.7%-93.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative CNB may be predictive of parotid cancer prognosis. Patients receiving a diagnosis of malignancy on preoperative CNB demonstrated a worse prognosis compared to those with a \"less-than-malignant\" diagnosis. Additionally, CNB exhibited higher sensitivity than FNA in identifying malignancies of the parotid gland.</p>","PeriodicalId":10318,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2024.00227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Salivary gland tumors present a diagnostic challenge, with preoperative false-negative results frequently leading to an unexpected diagnosis of malignancy after parotidectomy. This study was conducted to explore the clinical utility of preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB) in diagnosing malignancies before primary parotidectomy and to assess the prognostic implications of CNB for parotid gland cancers.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 615 patients who underwent preoperative CNB and parotidectomy for primary parotid tumors from 2003 to 2023 at a tertiary referral hospital. Among these patients, 102 who were diagnosed with primary parotid malignancy following parotidectomy were examined regarding survival outcomes. Disease-free survival (DFS) and predictive factors were assessed through univariable and multivariable analyses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of CNB were determined. These metrics were then compared to those of a separate cohort of 547 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and parotidectomy within the same timeframe.
Results: In the CNB group, the 5-year predicted DFS was 86.9% (95% CI, 79.2%-95.3%). Multivariable analysis identified male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 8.48; 95% CI, 1.05-68.76) and a CNB finding of malignancy (HR, 8.20; 95% CI, 1.01-66.15) as factors significantly associated with decreased DFS. CNB demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (89.0%; 95% CI, 81.2%-94.4%) and NPV (97.6%; 95% CI, 95.7%-98.8%) compared to FNA, which had a sensitivity of 45.2% (95% CI, 33.5%-57.3%) and an NPV of 90.8% (95% CI, 87.7%-93.3%).
Conclusion: Preoperative CNB may be predictive of parotid cancer prognosis. Patients receiving a diagnosis of malignancy on preoperative CNB demonstrated a worse prognosis compared to those with a "less-than-malignant" diagnosis. Additionally, CNB exhibited higher sensitivity than FNA in identifying malignancies of the parotid gland.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology (Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, CEO) is an international peer-reviewed journal on recent developments in diagnosis and treatment of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery and dedicated to the advancement of patient care in ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders. This journal publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic researches, reviews, and clinical trials, encompassing the whole topics of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery.
CEO was first issued in 2008 and this journal is published in English four times (the last day of February, May, August, and November) per year by the Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The Journal aims at publishing evidence-based, scientifically written articles from different disciplines of otorhinolaryngology field.
The readership contains clinical/basic research into current practice in otorhinolaryngology, audiology, speech pathology, head and neck oncology, plastic and reconstructive surgery. The readers are otolaryngologists, head and neck surgeons and oncologists, audiologists, and speech pathologists.