Clinical outcome of low-dose and high-dose drug-coated balloon angioplasty with intraplaque wiring for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion lesions.

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yuki Shima, Narumi Taninobu, Akihiro Ikuta, Kazunori Mushiake, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Kazushige Kadota
{"title":"Clinical outcome of low-dose and high-dose drug-coated balloon angioplasty with intraplaque wiring for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion lesions.","authors":"Yuki Shima, Narumi Taninobu, Akihiro Ikuta, Kazunori Mushiake, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Kazushige Kadota","doi":"10.1007/s12928-024-01067-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions of the femoropopliteal artery have been shown to benefit from drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, because bailout stenting is often performed, the outcome of DCB angioplasty alone remains unknown, particularly the differences in outcomes between low-dose DCB (LD-DCB) and high-dose DCB (HD-DCB). To address these issues, we conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study and enrolled 66 consecutive patients undergoing initial endovascular therapy with DCBs for femoropopliteal CTO lesions from June 2018 to February 2023. Of the 66 patients, 25 underwent LD-DCB angioplasty and 41 underwent HD-DCB angioplasty. In all lesions, no bailout stenting was performed and intraplaque wiring was confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. The primary outcome measure was 1-year primary patency and the secondary outcome measures were 1-year freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and reocclusion. There were no significant differences between LD-DCB and HD-DCB angioplasty in patient and lesion characteristics, 1-year primary patency (76.4% vs. 85.9%, log-rank p = 0.51), CD-TLR (95.2% vs. 94.3%, log-rank p = 0.97), and reocclusion (95.0% vs. 94.3%, log-rank p = 0.99). Patients with two of the three risk factors for restenosis, i.e., minimum lumen area < 12.6 mm<sup>2</sup>, dissection angle > 63°, and calcification angle > 270°, had a significantly lower patency rate (no factor: 100% vs. 1 factor: 90.3% vs. 2 factors: 62.6%; log-rank p = 0.04). In patients undergoing DCB angioplasty for femoropopliteal CTO lesions, 1-year primary patency and freedom from CD-TLR were favorable, with no significant difference between LD-DCB and HD-DCB angioplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-024-01067-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions of the femoropopliteal artery have been shown to benefit from drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, because bailout stenting is often performed, the outcome of DCB angioplasty alone remains unknown, particularly the differences in outcomes between low-dose DCB (LD-DCB) and high-dose DCB (HD-DCB). To address these issues, we conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study and enrolled 66 consecutive patients undergoing initial endovascular therapy with DCBs for femoropopliteal CTO lesions from June 2018 to February 2023. Of the 66 patients, 25 underwent LD-DCB angioplasty and 41 underwent HD-DCB angioplasty. In all lesions, no bailout stenting was performed and intraplaque wiring was confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. The primary outcome measure was 1-year primary patency and the secondary outcome measures were 1-year freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and reocclusion. There were no significant differences between LD-DCB and HD-DCB angioplasty in patient and lesion characteristics, 1-year primary patency (76.4% vs. 85.9%, log-rank p = 0.51), CD-TLR (95.2% vs. 94.3%, log-rank p = 0.97), and reocclusion (95.0% vs. 94.3%, log-rank p = 0.99). Patients with two of the three risk factors for restenosis, i.e., minimum lumen area < 12.6 mm2, dissection angle > 63°, and calcification angle > 270°, had a significantly lower patency rate (no factor: 100% vs. 1 factor: 90.3% vs. 2 factors: 62.6%; log-rank p = 0.04). In patients undergoing DCB angioplasty for femoropopliteal CTO lesions, 1-year primary patency and freedom from CD-TLR were favorable, with no significant difference between LD-DCB and HD-DCB angioplasty.

低剂量和高剂量药物包被球囊血管成形术治疗股腘动脉慢性全闭塞病变的临床效果。
慢性全闭塞(CTO)病变的股腘动脉已显示受益于药物包被球囊(DCB)血管成形术。然而,由于经常进行救助支架置入,单独进行DCB血管成形术的结果仍然未知,特别是低剂量DCB (LD-DCB)和高剂量DCB (HD-DCB)之间的结果差异。为了解决这些问题,我们进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,并在2018年6月至2023年2月期间连续招募了66名接受DCBs初始血管内治疗股腘动脉CTO病变的患者。66例患者中,25例行LD-DCB血管成形术,41例行HD-DCB血管成形术。在所有病变中,均未行支架置入术,并通过血管内超声确认斑块内连接。主要结局指标是1年的原发性通畅,次要结局指标是1年无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术(CD-TLR)和再闭塞。LD-DCB和HD-DCB血管成形术在患者和病变特征、1年原发性通畅(76.4% vs. 85.9%, log-rank p = 0.51)、CD-TLR (95.2% vs. 94.3%, log-rank p = 0.97)和再闭塞(95.0% vs. 94.3%, log-rank p = 0.99)方面无显著差异。三种再狭窄危险因素中,最小管腔面积2、夹层角> 63°、钙化角> 270°的患者,其通畅率明显较低(无因素:100% vs. 1因素:90.3% vs. 2因素:62.6%;Log-rank p = 0.04)。在接受DCB血管成形术治疗股腘CTO病变的患者中,1年的初级通畅和CD-TLR的自由是有利的,LD-DCB和HD-DCB血管成形术之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信