SARS-CoV-2 in semen: a multicenter prospective study and literature review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ANDROLOGY
Giovanni Cochetti, Michele Del Zingaro, Giuseppe Maiolino, Alessio Paladini, Matteo Mearini, Riccardo Schiavina, Lorenzo Bianchi, Lorenzo De Angelis, Mattia Panciarola, Barbara Camilloni, Eugenio Brunocilla, Ettore Mearini
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 in semen: a multicenter prospective study and literature review.","authors":"Giovanni Cochetti, Michele Del Zingaro, Giuseppe Maiolino, Alessio Paladini, Matteo Mearini, Riccardo Schiavina, Lorenzo Bianchi, Lorenzo De Angelis, Mattia Panciarola, Barbara Camilloni, Eugenio Brunocilla, Ettore Mearini","doi":"10.1186/s12610-024-00236-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite numerous efforts to demonstrate the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 in semen of affected males, no clear evidence exists. We conducted a multicenter prospective study on adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 including patients with active infection (Active Group) and with a history of COVID-19 disease at least of 6 months (Recovered Group). An RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 and a semen analysis were performed on the semen of the enrolled patients. Genital/sexual symptoms were investigated in both groups. In the active infection group, urinary and sexual functions were assessed in the active phase and after 6 months. Finally, the literature on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in semen was reviewed non-systematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five patients were enrolled (Active Group = 15, Recovered Group = 50). RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 found no trace of the virus in any of the semen samples. Genital/sexual symptoms during the active phase were reported in 8 (12.2%) patients. No statistically significant differences in semen quality were found between the two groups. IPSS and IIEF-5 scores did not change significantly during the different phases of infection about (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in semen of acute or recovered cases. Sperm parameters were not significantly different in the two groups. Urinary and erectile functions appeared stable across the phases of infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":8730,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Andrology","volume":"34 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-024-00236-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite numerous efforts to demonstrate the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 in semen of affected males, no clear evidence exists. We conducted a multicenter prospective study on adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 including patients with active infection (Active Group) and with a history of COVID-19 disease at least of 6 months (Recovered Group). An RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 and a semen analysis were performed on the semen of the enrolled patients. Genital/sexual symptoms were investigated in both groups. In the active infection group, urinary and sexual functions were assessed in the active phase and after 6 months. Finally, the literature on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in semen was reviewed non-systematically.

Results: Sixty-five patients were enrolled (Active Group = 15, Recovered Group = 50). RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 found no trace of the virus in any of the semen samples. Genital/sexual symptoms during the active phase were reported in 8 (12.2%) patients. No statistically significant differences in semen quality were found between the two groups. IPSS and IIEF-5 scores did not change significantly during the different phases of infection about (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in semen of acute or recovered cases. Sperm parameters were not significantly different in the two groups. Urinary and erectile functions appeared stable across the phases of infection.

精液中的SARS-CoV-2:一项多中心前瞻性研究和文献综述
背景:尽管许多努力证明受影响男性精液中存在SARS-CoV-2,但没有明确的证据存在。我们对确诊为SARS-CoV-2的成年患者进行了一项多中心前瞻性研究,包括活动性感染患者(活跃组)和至少有6个月COVID-19病史的患者(康复组)。对入选患者的精液进行了SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测和精液分析。两组均调查了生殖器/性症状。活动性感染组分别在活动性期和6个月后评估尿功能和性功能。最后,对精液中SARS-CoV-2检测的文献进行了非系统的综述。结果:共纳入65例患者(活跃组15例,康复组50例)。对SARS-CoV-2的RT-PCR检测在任何精液样本中都没有发现该病毒的痕迹。8例(12.2%)患者在活跃期出现生殖器/性症状。两组患者的精液质量无统计学差异。IPSS和IIEF-5评分在感染不同阶段无显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论:急性和康复病例精液中未检出SARS-CoV-2。两组精子参数差异无统计学意义。泌尿和勃起功能在感染的各个阶段表现稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Basic and Clinical Andrology
Basic and Clinical Andrology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic and Clinical Andrology is an open access journal in the domain of andrology covering all aspects of male reproductive and sexual health in both human and animal models. The journal aims to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments in andrology from the international community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信